I know about YREGS and IAZYREG. But there are not what I want. What I want
would have lines akin to:
R0 EQU 0GR
R0_64EQU 0GR64
R0_32EQU 0GR32
AR0 EQU 0AR
Am I just being "too anal" in wanting to have something flagged like:
MVI SOMEVAR,R0 SAVE HIGH BY
: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: superior IBM supplied "register equate" macro?
I know about YREGS and IAZYREG. But there are not what I want. What I want
would have lines akin to:
R0 EQU 0GR
R0_64EQU 0GR64
R0_32EQU 0GR32
AR0 EQU 0AR
gt;their own.
>
>Charles
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of John McKown
>Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:52 AM
>To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>Subject: superior IBM supplied &quo
Look at ASMDREG in the HLASM toolkit. I can't remember offhand.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: 20 July 2017 20:52
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: superior IBM supplied &quo
without the "size" portion. I.e. no "GR" or "GR32" or "GR64" type operand.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of John McKown
> Sent: 20 July 2017 20:52
&
rogrammers aren't nearly anal enough :-)
sas
> -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@
> LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
> > On Behalf Of John McKown
> > Sent: 20 July 2017 20:52
> > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> > Subject: supe
On 2017-07-21, at 00:28, Pieter Wiid wrote:
> Look at ASMDREG in the HLASM toolkit. I can't remember offhand.
>
> From: John McKown
> Sent: 20 July 2017 20:52
>
> I know about YREGS and IAZYREG. But there are not what I want. What I want
> would have lines akin to:
>
A wonderful thing about s
BM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@
> > LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
> > > On Behalf Of John McKown
> > > Sent: 20 July 2017 20:52
> > > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> > > Subject: superior IBM supplied "register equate" macro?
> &g
Unfortunately, (like base registers), registers can change the "meaning"
of their contents at different points in the program.
Rather than static equates giving the same register two different names,
I think it would be cleaner, and safer, to have a directive analogous to
USING which would say to
Of Brent Longborough
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 3:00 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Superior IBM supplied "register equate" macro?
Unfortunately, (like base registers), registers can change the "meaning"
of their contents at different points in the program
HI instead of an
> AGHI somewhere in the middle.
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Brent Longborough
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 3:00 AM
> To: ASSEMBLER-LI
HLASM already does exactly that. RTFM for EQU attributes.
sas
On 7/22/2017 9:54, graeme wrote:
I use r0:r15 for 32 bit reg references, g0:g15 for 64 bit reg references.
Where the instruction references, or sets, bits 0:31 of a 64 bit reg, I use the appropriate
"gn" symbolic to identify the
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 23:54:49 +1000, graeme wrote:
>I use r0:r15 for 32 bit reg references, g0:g15 for 64 bit reg references.
>
>Where the instruction references, or sets, bits 0:31 of a 64 bit reg, I use
>the appropriate "gn" symbolic to identify the register, else I use the
>appropriate "rn" sy
13 matches
Mail list logo
