[Assp-test] Mail::CheckUser

Is there a good place where to install Mail::CheckUser for Win32 Active State Perl 5.008007 or 8? Tried uwinnipeg, trouchelle and AS repos but no avail. TIA Katip - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the be

[Assp-test] Subject causes mess

I think below Subject confuses ASSP and causes entire message to be checked as "Subject" - (blah ...) Subject: [Bayesian] =?windows-1254?Q?5_Nisan_da_=C7anakkale'de_T=FCrkiye'nin_en_b=FCy=FC?= =?windows-1254?Q?k_=E7evre_mitinginde_bulu=FEal=FDm?= Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:02:44 +0200

[Assp-test] 19.4 will not work for me

>19.4 will not work for me as my PPM is currently unable to install > Mail::CheckUser. > > TIA, Luke > >Here's 19.1, I missed 19.2 Thanks a lot. You actually sent 19.2 :)- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It

Re: [Assp-test] Updated rebuildspamdb for public testing

Pascal Dreissen wrote: One glitch in text however :) You nee more spam messages in the corpus. Maybe Kevin is a Monty Python fan? :-) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature - Check out the new SourceForg

Re: [Assp-test] Updated rebuildspamdb for public testing

On 29 mrt 2008, at 23:00, Kevin wrote: > Pascal Dreissen wrote: >> Seems to be working very effective, however i do not see the >> spamdb.helo being rebuild is this correct ? > > I apparently deleted the call for that subroutine when I was tweaking > the output. :( > > I've uploaded v2.1_1 which c

Re: [Assp-test] Is 1.3.5 ok now?

David wrote: > I'm running 1.3.5(14.32) and have been reluctant to upgrade because of > all the problems that ~16 was having. Are people running 19 and beyond > successfully now? Granted, it's not all fixed, but is the major > weirdness gone? 19.1 is running great for me.

[Assp-test] (no subject)

Can some one please send to me [EMAIL PROTECTED] as an attachment- assp.pl file v 1.3.5(19.2) as I stupidly did not backup, but downloaded over/replaced it. 19.4 will not work for me as my PPM is currently unable to install Mail::CheckUser. TIA, Luke

Re: [Assp-test] Updated rebuildspamdb for public testing

Pascal Dreissen wrote: > Seems to be working very effective, however i do not see the > spamdb.helo being rebuild is this correct ? I apparently deleted the call for that subroutine when I was tweaking the output. :( I've uploaded v2.1_1 which corrects that, same download url. Kevin

[Assp-test] Is 1.3.5 ok now?

I'm running 1.3.5(14.32) and have been reluctant to upgrade because of all the problems that ~16 was having. Are people running 19 and beyond successfully now? Granted, it's not all fixed, but is the major weirdness gone? -

[Assp-test] 1.3.5 status and feature freeze

Just curious to know (if) when 1.3.5 is supposed to call a feature freeze and start working on the release candidate builds. I want to use it on production servers when it's stable. I bet it'll perform better than 1.3.3.x - Ch

[Assp-test] 19.3 crashes if Mail::CheckUser isn't installed....

./assp.pl Can't locate Mail/CheckUser.pm in @INC Installing Mail::CheckUser with cpan gave me errors so I had to use force install to ignore them. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place t

Re: [Assp-test] Updated rebuildspamdb for public testing

On 29 mrt 2008, at 02:32, Kevin wrote: > I'm releasing, for public testing, a major update/rewrite of the > rebuilsdpamdb script. > > In addition to the script output being significantly expanded, the > code has been heavily refactored and rewritten for performance and > maintainability. > Users s