>
> Nothing is disabled, because the sub is not called. But if it
> would be called, the norm above 3 would disable Bayesian.
>
>
Thanks for the explanation. Have a good one!
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 20
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> Do the developers anticipate a feature-freeze for 1.3.5 soon? Or is
>> this version to be continually evolving for the forseeable future?
>>
>
>
> IMHO 1.3.5 is production ready. Is it bug free ? No - and never will
> be. So from time to time a report will show up a
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Might be a stupid question, but will my Bayesian check be disabled or
>is it
>just for norms being above 3?
Nothing is disabled, because the sub is not called. But if it would be
called, the norm above 3 would disable Bayesian.
-
So I am guessing I am looking at things wrong.
The other email that is getting marked because:
X-Assp-Envelope-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is not white listed.
Hmm so although the e-mail was from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have to
white list the Envelope-From?
>the message you showed came from
>[EMAIL PR
If you are using flatfiles for hashes and lists with 2.0.0, it is possible
that all list and hashes are empty in Worker-Threads! There is no problem
using DB-based hashes!
I'm just working on that!
Thomas
DISCLAIMER:
***
This email and any fil
That is because I did not post the whole list just the part that showed
that I had white listed the domain from the assp.conf. I run two copies
of ASSP so had to post each to show that they were white listed.
>PS: Daniel, you have a a trailing pipe in whiteListedDomains.
They may not. But I found that no processing some of them seem to have
ill affects also.
I also was not sure if no processing affects things like virus checking
and who knows what else.
I wants some processing. But I also have some that I just need to come
thought so I do have some in the no proc
Everything after
If set and DoBombHeaderRe is enabled, expressions like 'BY yourLOCALDOMAIN'
will be used to identify Spam
is bold
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this yea
DoBombHeaderByLocalDomain need's an after DoBombHeaderRe.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D
>Do the developers anticipate a feature-freeze for 1.3.5 soon? Or is
>this version to be continually evolving for the forseeable future?
IMHO 1.3.5 is production ready. Is it bug free ? No - and never will
be. So from time to time a report will show up and the issue will be
fixed.
Development
I noticed this in the changes:
sub ReadNorm {
# read some values from rebuildspamdb
my ( $fh ) = @_;
my $this = $Con{$fh};
return if -e "$base/normfile";
open(H,"<$base/normfile");
my $norm=split(" ",); close H;
return if !$norm;
if ( $norm > 3) {
$this->{badnorm}=$norm;
mlog(
>Well hate to say it but yes they are.
the message you showed came from
X-Assp-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is *not* whitelisted.
@jtime.dreamhost.com is * not* in whitedomain.
-
Th
Do the developers anticipate a feature-freeze for 1.3.5 soon? Or is
this version to be continually evolving for the forseeable future?
--
Daniel
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't mi
Top posting because I don't want to look at it again: You whitelist all
those?? Does anyone else do similar? If anything, I No Process some of
those. I wouldn't whitelist though because of the marketing-speak, etc.
I'm curious to know if others are doing the same.
PS: Daniel, you have a a
Well hate to say it but yes they are.
whiteListedDomains:=rainministries.com|revision3.com|etapestry.com|foodt
idings.com|ebay.com|evite.com|kerasotes.com|yapta.com|churchdwight.com|g
racetogo.org|lifepics.com|orbitz.com|viatalk.com|internetphonesupport.co
m|urbana.org|mtstravel.com|project127.co
Doug Lytle wrote:
> All our replies are being banned as 'bad attachments' Had to roll back
> to 1.3.5 (22.6)
>
> Doug
>
Looks like it's fixed in 23.1. Thanks.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Confere
They are *not* whitelisted, the delay header shows that, because it
does not mention "whitelisted":
X-Assp-Delay: delayed for 24m 49s; 28 Apr 2008 06:59:56 -0600
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Con
I have several e-mail today that are white listed in both areas That are
getting marked as SAPM despite that they are white listed. I have posted
the headers below of a couple.
Is it my configuration or something else.
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Daniel Du Vall
Ori
All our replies are being banned as 'bad attachments' Had to roll back
to 1.3.5 (22.6)
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
