[Assp-test] TNEF in 1.4.1

Is TNEF conversion included in 1.4.1? -- Daniel - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a tri

Re: [Assp-test] Bacscatter options in assp 1.4.1

ASSP development mailing list schreibt: > Since ASSP is a daemon, what does "show the event" mean? Is it >recorded >in the log? ASSP is not a daemon, it is an application you can run as a service. And yes, "show the event" means "record it in the log". What else should it mean? fritz -

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Interesting attachment blocking problem

>The speed of updates is a double-edged sword. > >How hard would it be to add a button in the GUI to: > >1. Check if there is a new version available, and > >2. Update to the new version (if the two versions are compatible >enough >to simply pull down and replace assp.pl and restart)... > >? We

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.4.1 going to be closed

ASSP 1.4.1 is now closed - code is freezed. Please help to publish a solid version by replacing 1.3.3,1.3.5 and 1.3.9 in your installation. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Bu

Re: [Assp-test] Interesting attachment blocking pro blem

> At all times, I'd risk that >a newer version was posted immediately after I downloaded the >published one. I did not say, you should update daily. I said : " If you think you find a bug in a beta version..." We have a stream of reports and we built them into the product daily. So a bug you

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Interesting attachment bloc

>It's REALLY tough to keep up with all this, partly because > does not say >which element is updated in which minor revision. That page just >lumps everything together. :-( Stop whining. There is a project page: http://www.magicvillage.de/~F

Re: [Assp-test] Bacscatter options in assp 1.4.1

> Since ASSP is a daemon, what does "show the event" mean? Is > it recorded in the log? Yes, you can view the event in the Maillog tail (provided in ASSP) or you can go directly to the log file. - This SF.Net email is spo

Re: [Assp-test] Bacscatter options in assp 1.4.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/07/08 12:51 pm, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: >>No one knows what these options do? > > They do the same as in 20 other features. It is standard in ASSP to > have this options. > block = block the mail > monitor = show the event, do not block > score =

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Interesting attachment blocking problem

>1. Check if there is a new version available, and > >2. Update to the new version (if the two versions are compatible enough >to simply pull down and replace assp.pl and restart)... Good idea. :-) T. - This SF.Net email is

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Interesting attachment blocking problem

On 8/8/2008, Thomas Eckardt/eck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I think there is nearly every day a new version available. The speed of updates is a double-edged sword. How hard would it be to add a button in the GUI to: 1. Check if there is a new version available, and 2. Update to the new versio

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Interesting attachment blocking problem

>if you think you have found a bug, post it with the full ASSP-version. I have on some posts, but forgot on some others. I'll remember in future (I hope). T. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Develope

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Interesting attachment blocking problem

I think there is nearly every day a new version available. You do not have to update every day - but how ever, if you think you have found a bug, post it with the full ASSP-version. We know, if we have already fixed it. Thomas Trevor Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Assp-test] Interesting attachment blocking problem

>If you think you find a bug in a beta version, please,please, make >sure you run the latest one. I tried, but in 25 years of software I've never seen a beta programme with so many or so frequent updates. :-/ At all times, I'd risk that a newer version was posted immediately after I downloaded

[Assp-test] version! version! version!

Hi all, the last days have shown, that it is very important for us to know the exact version of ASSP (X.X.X-YY.ZZZ), if there is a bug reported! Thomas DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally p

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Interesting attachment blocking problem

>There is no blocking of attachment in the log! That's what I said: > >with 2.0.0_5.02 - and all was OK! >Same here (I just overwrote 4.08 with 5.02 to rerun the test): :-) >Please set AttachmentLog (it's new) to verbose and repeat the test! >You should see the exact attachmentname iin the lo

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Interesting attachment blocking problem

>2.0.0(4.08), however, fails this. If you think you find a bug in a beta version, please,please, make sure you run the latest one. fritz - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build

[Assp-test] version! version version!

Hi all, the last days have shown, that it is very important for us to know the exact version of ASSP (X.X.X-YY.ZZZ), if there is a bug reported! Thomas DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Interesting attachment blocking problem

There is no blocking of attachment in the log! Please set AttachmentLog (it's new) to verbose and repeat the test! You should see the exact attachmentname iin the log. The attachment detection engine was completly redesigned in 2.0.0_4.13 and 1.4.1_0.28! Thomas Trevor Jacques <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: ASSP 1.4.1 going to be closed

Please test the newest 1.4.1. fritz - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two t

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Interesting attachment blocking problem

>with 2.0.0_5.02 - and all was OK! Same here (I just overwrote 4.08 with 5.02 to rerun the test): Aug-8-08 10:55:13 [Worker_1] Connected: 64.233.184.235:51507 -> 66.96.20.5:25 -> 127.0.0. 1:125 Aug-8-08 10:55:13 [Worker_1] info: got 250-STARTTLS ready from 127.0.0.1:125 Aug-8-

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 2 integrates rebuildspamdb.pl

ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >Hello Fritz, >any chance to see this also in the 1.x branch happening? no. fritz - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Lin

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Interesting attachment blocking problem

I've just made a test with this filename : Sample YYZ-YVR-SFO aircanada.com Flights Review Flight Details.pdf with 2.0.0_5.02 - and all was OK! Thomas Trevor Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08.08.2008 15:08 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An A

Re: [Assp-test] Interesting attachment blocking problem

>I need to know the full detected name of the attachment in the maillog! I presume that assp detected the name in the log, even though the name was longer, as I posted. >I hope the highlighted parts are not all? The log entry is a straight cut and paste from the maillog tail. It is as complete

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Interesting attachment blocking problem

Aug-8-08 08:48:51 id-99730-23514 [Worker_2] 64.233.184.228 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Score: total for this message is 10, added BadAttachment for bad attachment '"Sample YYZ-YVR-SFO aircanada.com ' Aug-8-08 08:48:51 id-99730-23514 [Wor

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 2 integrates rebuildspamdb.pl

Hello Fritz, any chance to see this also in the 1.x branch happening? Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > - rebuildspamdb.pl and move2num.pl are now integrated into assp.pl > > There are no separate apps and cron jobs necessary anymore. > > > -

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

>I can't understand why it reads "Collecting, Testmode, >CopySpam, and Spam-Lover settings are ignored" >since, in this case ASSP already has the needed infos >to tell if a given message may belong to the above >"categories"; that's what I can't understand I will change the text. Actually, if t

Re: [Assp-test] Attachment Blocking Request

On 8/8/2008, Hill, Brett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have not used ASSP's attachment blocking yet, because I have had other > means for doing that. One thing I would like to see is the option to, > instead of out right blocking the email, inserting a text file in place > of the attachment that

[Assp-test] Attachment Blocking Request

I have not used ASSP's attachment blocking yet, because I have had other means for doing that. One thing I would like to see is the option to, instead of out right blocking the email, inserting a text file in place of the attachment that was meant to be blocked. And in that text file would be an

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Interesting attachment blocking problem

>These two version a totaly different in attachment handling - have >you really checked this with 2.0.0 ? Yup. For a moment, I thought I might have opened the same server in two browser windows, but I've just tested it again: Aug-8-08 08:48:50 [Worker_2] Connected: 64.233.184.228:47598 -> 66.9

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

> I wonder what is not understandable: " I can't understand why it reads "Collecting, Testmode, CopySpam, and Spam-Lover settings are ignored" since, in this case ASSP already has the needed infos to tell if a given message may belong to the above "categories"; that's what I can't understand --

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

On 8/8/2008, Fritz Borgstedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Ah, so it would only use the cache... an acceptable compromise... > It uses Cache before Delaying, and normal DNSBL after Delaying (if not > in Cache). Right, thats what I meant... thanks for the confirmation... -- Best regards, Charl

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

ASSP development mailing list schreibt: > >Ah, so it would only use the cache... an acceptable compromise... It uses Cache before Delaying, and normal DNSBL after Delaying (if not in Cache). fritz - This SF.Net email is sp

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

GrayHat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreibt: >well... then I wonder why the note reads > >If set, ASSP will use cached DNSBL hits to block messages >before other tests. I wonder what is not understandable: " >before other tests ". -

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

On 8/8/2008 7:08 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > DNSBL cache check is done before Delaying if > Early DNSBL Cache Blocking (ForceRBLCache) is set. Ah, so it would only use the cache... an acceptable compromise... -- Best regards, Charles --

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

> DNSBL cache check is done before Delaying if > Early DNSBL Cache Blocking (ForceRBLCache) is set. well... then I wonder why the note reads If set, ASSP will use cached DNSBL hits to block messages before other tests. Collecting, Testmode, CopySpam, and Spam-Lover settings are ignored. not

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

DNSBL cache check is done before Delaying if Early DNSBL Cache Blocking (ForceRBLCache) is set. fritz - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP roadmap (was: Interesting att achment blocking problem)

>What about 1.3.9.x branch ? Is that aborted too and will never be >published >as stable on sourceforge ? I think it's been last updated a few days >ago. > >What is stable now and will be mantained for the next few months ? >Any ideas >about the roadmap, with sf public releases ? Read the projec

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

> Wouldn't it be better performing the DNSBL > checks right after receiving the "tuple" and if > the DNSBL fails (given that the sender isn't > whitelisted and the recipient isn't a spamlover > or noprocessing one), directly reject the > incoming connection ? just to expand this a little we get

Re: [Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

On 8/8/2008, GrayHat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Wouldn't it be better performing the DNSBL > checks right after receiving the "tuple" and if > the DNSBL fails No... this would consume much more resources (require DNS lookups) as well as result in many unnecessary hits against the DNSBL you are

[Assp-test] DNSBL behaviour

Looking at the logs, and assuming I'm not wrong, it seems that ASSP perform the DNSBL checks *after* applying the "delaying" to an incoming message; now... Wouldn't it be better performing the DNSBL checks right after receiving the "tuple" and if the DNSBL fails (given that the sender isn't whitel

[Assp-test] ASSP roadmap (was: Interesting attachment blocking problem)

>>1.3.5 and 2.0.x: > > >As I said before: 1.3.5 is superceded. > >I think you should try 1.4.1, it behaves like 2.0 regarding attachment >checking. What about 1.3.9.x branch ? Is that aborted too and will never be published as stable on sourceforge ? I think it's been last updated a few days ago.

Re: [Assp-test] Interesting attachment blocking problem

ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >1.3.5 and 2.0.x: As I said before: 1.3.5 is superceded. I think you should try 1.4.1, it behaves like 2.0 regarding attachment checking. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Mob