ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>version 2.0.1_RC 0.0.15 cannot be started as a service - error 1053
Sorry, 15c should do.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified li
Problem happens in both 1.5.1 and 2.0 for me.
On Apr 22, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
>> We are dealing with threads here
>
>
> This thread is about ASSP 1.5.1. ASSP V1 does not have threads.
>
>
> --
At 08:32 AM 4/23/2009, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
>This belong to all forced-checks - if set to block no headerlines will be
>added.
Hi Thomas,
When it was set to block, lots of spam was getting through with one
header line added by ASSP. Now that it is not set to block, the same
emails (tons o
version 2.0.1_RC 0.0.15 cannot be started as a service - error 1053
regards
Marco
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty-free di
2.0.1_RC0.0.16:
- SenderBase (no Org + no Country) - now scoreable
- BackScatterDNS-check - now better results
- full TLS + SSL Stats
Thomas
DISCLAIMER:
***
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privilege
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I noticed the option for SPF2 (along with some other SPF checks) was
>removed. Is that just a test or do we no longer need it?
Mail::SPF::Query is not longer user in V1
Mail::SPF is now the only module used for SPF in V1
---
>That's funny. You get no bounces ? On a real server ?
Yes, I use V2 !
But to solve the problem (if one) - I need the info.
Thomas
"marrco"
23.04.2009 19:53
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
"'ASSP development mailing list'"
Kopie
Thema
Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re:
I noticed the option for SPF2 (along with some other SPF checks) was
removed. Is that just a test or do we no longer need it?
Kind Regards,
Brett
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new s
>> Can you confirm that it works for you ?
>>
>> I'm unable to check this but I think so - I get no bounces and even if,
That's funny. You get no bounces ? On a real server ?
(btw I reported this first on 4/4 - faulty backscatter filter in
1.5.1.1(1.0.06) and provided also an ip address)
--
>>But since you're asking what do I expect, did you test that option on a
>>production server ?
>
> All code that is written, is running immediately and only on production
> servers!
>
> Thomas
With all respect, I hope this is not the same server you say is getting "no
bounces" and so you "just t
>
>Non everyone is reporting, and yes, it's not very popular.
There are more than 7000 servers. We switched to scripts on SF with
version 1.5.1 starting on March 15th. So 900 is the number who
installed 1.5.1 already.
>> http://assp.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/assp_stats
>>
>
>
> Only 951 hosts? I would have thought there would a whole lot more.
Non everyone is reporting, and yes, it's not very popular. Once it was part
of a few linux distro, it was a small and fast proxy known to be really
stable and almost bugf
>But since you're asking what do I expect, did you test that option on a
>production server ?
All code that is written, is running immediately and only on production
servers!
Thomas
"marrco"
23.04.2009 19:15
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
"'ASSP development mailing
>Can you confirm that it works for you ?
I'm unable to check this but I think so - I get no bounces and even if,
they are checked by FBMTV! For this reason I want you, to look in to the
log.
It does not realy help to report that anything does not work, without
giving some more information (...
> What do you expect, if a domain has no country and no organisation - only
> in this case (No CountryCode/Organization) is logged?
Not logged, blocked ! of [spam found] (No CountryCode/Organization);
Based on what you say it's always spam ?
I manually verified the few entries I had and found a
Steve Thompson wrote:
>
>
> > http://assp.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/assp_stats
> >
>
>
> Only 951 hosts? I would have thought there would a whole lot more.
There's probably the issue that a lot of people haven't upgraded to the
latest version of ASSP (which would have the updated code to point
> http://assp.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/assp_stats
>
Only 951 hosts? I would have thought there would a whole lot more.
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - reg
> What is your setup for 'BounceSenders' ? Backscatter check will be only
> done for this senders and <> (empty by default).
Sorry to put it the other way.
Can you confirm that it works for you ?
I'm reporting (not the first time) that it does not work for me, and afaik
it never worked for an
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
What do you expect, if a domain has no country and no organisation - only
in this case (No CountryCode/Organization) is logged?
Thomas
"marrco"
23.04.2009 18:44
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
"'ASSP development mailing list'"
Kopie
Thema
Re
> This is configured with 'DoOrgBlocking' not with 'DoCountryBlocking' .
> I have a few wrongly blocked messages because of
> [spam found] (No CountryCode/Organization);
>
> But Do Country Blocking is set to DISABLED
>
> And in the message statistic logs I have the count (growing) of messages
>
What is your setup for 'BounceSenders' ? Backscatter check will be only
done for this senders and <> (empty by default).
Thomas
"marrco"
23.04.2009 18:01
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
"'ASSP development mailing list'"
Kopie
Thema
[Assp-test] backscatter detectio
What is in the Log about backscatter? Set BacksctrLog to verbose. Try to
check an IP (from where you've got such mail) webbased at
backscatterer.org
Thomas
"marrco"
23.04.2009 18:01
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
"'ASSP development mailing list'"
Kopie
Thema
[Ass
This is configured with 'DoOrgBlocking' not with 'DoCountryBlocking' .
Thomas
"marrco"
23.04.2009 17:57
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
"'ASSP development mailing list'"
Kopie
Thema
[Assp-test] countrycode bug
Already reported a problem with countrycode, but it
Already reported, option removed and then put back
ASSP Version: 1.5.1.2(1.0.11)
But still 0 hits with Backscatter detection. Also 0 hits in the global assp
stats, so I never worked for anyone.
And I do receive a good amout of backscatter, so I can easily test disabling
my bs filter.
-
Already reported a problem with countrycode, but it's still present in
1.5.1.2.1.0.11
I have a few wrongly blocked messages because of
[spam found] (No CountryCode/Organization);
But Do Country Blocking is set to DISABLED
And in the message statistic logs I have the count (growing) of messages
>
> Heh... the problem is that, apparently there's no 1.91 for
> win32 at least not in the repos I'm using, btw if you know of
> any other repo carrying that I'd be happy to test the 0.95.1
> in production, till then, I'll just give it a spin on a test system
>
I just did a manual install us
> I have File::Scan::ClamAV 1.91.
Heh... the problem is that, apparently there's no 1.91 for win32
at least not in the repos I'm using, btw if you know of any other
repo carrying that I'd be happy to test the 0.95.1 in production,
till then, I'll just give it a spin on a test system
---
On 23.04.2009 16:54, Steve Thompson wrote:
>> Could someone please confirm that this new port works with
>> File::Scan::ClamAV 1.8
>>
>
> I have File::Scan::ClamAV 1.91.
>
> This version http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav has been running for 30 minutes or
> so and no timeouts or lockups like I exp
I have been using the tBB version (0.95.1a) since this morning with no problems.
Peter
Peter Ingham
A-One Feed Supplements Ltd
North Hill
Dishforth Airfield
Thirsk
North Yorkshire
YO7 3DH
tel: +44 (0) 1423 322706
fax: +44 (0) 1423 323260
mobile: +44 (0) 7831 595300
peter.ing...@a-one.co.uk
> Could someone please confirm that this new port works with
> File::Scan::ClamAV 1.8
>
I have File::Scan::ClamAV 1.91.
This version http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav has been running for 30 minutes or so
and no timeouts or lockups like I experienced before.
---
Could someone please confirm that this new port works with File::Scan::ClamAV
1.8
There already has been a discussion on this list at the end of march which
clearly showed that the library of File::Scan::ClamAV has problems with 0.95.
I just want to be sure before I change my production system.
>
> > http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/
>
> THANKS :) !
>
>
I use this one:
http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April
> http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/
THANKS :) !
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 200
2.0.1_RC0.0.14 should fix the following:
- blockReportNow (GUI) does not work
- not all headers where added to some messages
- cleaned from unneeded code
- added 'SSL-Connection timeout' to Stats
- added parameter 'noProcessingFrom'
Thomas
DISCLAIMER:
**
This belong to all forced-checks - if set to block no headerlines will be
added.
Thomas
Scott MacLean
23.04.2009 14:29
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
ASSP development mailing list
Kopie
Thema
Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: RC13 headers still missing
It is set. I h
It is set. I have disabled it, and will watch to see the difference.
At 01:20 AM 4/23/2009, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>
>is 'ForceValidateHelo' set on your box ? If so, ASSP stopps checking (and
>adding headers) the mail!
>
>Thomas
>
>
>DISCLAIMER:
>
>>
>> Fyi a new version of the native w32 port of clamav has been released.
>>
>> http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/
>>
>
>That's fine, but does it fix the v0.95 lockup problem in ASSP?
>
>Kind Regards,
>Brett
I'm using that right now, no problems so far. But it just got released, so I
can't tell fo
marrco wrote:
>
> Fyi a new version of the native w32 port of clamav has been released.
>
> http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/
>
That's fine, but does it fix the v0.95 lockup problem in ASSP?
Kind Regards,
Brett
--
Stay o
Fyi a new version of the native w32 port of clamav has been released.
http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/
hth
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:52:44 +0200, Jens-Martin Groenne
wrote:
>
> I get the following error when I try to start ASSP 1.5.1.2(1.0.10)
>
> syntax error at /usr/local/sbin/assp line 2026, near ") {"
> Execution of /usr/local/sbin/assp aborted due to compilation errors.
>
> It is this line:
> if (
40 matches
Mail list logo