[Assp-test] Spam passed thru 1

2009-10-08 Thread Christian Leicht
Hello, since 2 days (1.6.0(0.0.10)) i get more spammails. The mail passes without any checking. Christian Received: (qmail 29789 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2009 08:32:07 +0200 Received: from localhost (HELO WebWorksLEICHT-) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2009 08:32:07 +0200

[Assp-test] Spam passed thru 2

2009-10-08 Thread Christian Leicht
Hello again, since 1.6.0 i have also the problem that wrong local senders passed. The sender is on a dynamic IP, use a local email adress, sending Viagra stuff. Do i need to buildup the assp.cfg file complete on chanching between 1.5.x and 1.6.x? Thanks for help Christian Received: (qmail

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 1

2009-10-08 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: The mail passes without any checking. I cannot see any ASSP header. You are sure, that this message passed through ASSP? -- Come build with us!

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 1

2009-10-08 Thread Christian Leicht
Yes Fritz, all emails coming through assp. Could it be that assp see the X-Antivirus-Status: Clean and stop processing? Christian Fritz Borgstedt schrieb: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: The mail passes without any checking. I cannot see any ASSP

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 2

2009-10-08 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: Do i need to buildup the assp.cfg file complete on chanching between 1.5.x and 1.6.x? No, but note that this is testing beta software. If you see a problem, report it with some some extracts from the assp-log. In this case

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 1

2009-10-08 Thread Christian Leicht
Fritz Borgstedt schrieb: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: The mail passes without any checking. Show me the ASSP-log for such a message. Hello Fritz, here the logfile entry on one receiver of a spam attack. In my first post i use a fake receiver

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 1

2009-10-08 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: eb...@citrinsolar.de Bayesian Check - Prob: 0.0 = ham Oct-8-09 08:32:10 WebWorks-83529-00612 74.86.11.8 conso...@consolchina.com to: armin. This seems like a mail which passes because ASSP does not

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 2

2009-10-08 Thread Christian Leicht
Sorry Fritz, but what is ASSO? Christian Fritz Borgstedt schrieb: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: Do i need to buildup the assp.cfg file complete on chanching between 1.5.x and 1.6.x? No, but note that this is testing beta software. If you see a

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 2

2009-10-08 Thread Matti Haack
CL Sorry Fritz, but what is ASSO? a typo. the P key is direct besides the O key... Matti -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this

Re: [Assp-test] Spam passed thru 1

2009-10-08 Thread Matti Haack
Hello Christian, is tihs mail really spam? The subject Manifold and Frame and Solar water heater sounds like it has to do something with your business. The recipient delayed: Logfiles are from greylisting and every mail from an unknown sender will produce this. If you want to block this mal,

[Assp-test] Curious: crash

2009-10-08 Thread Trevor Jacques
After about ten days of solid performance, 2.0.1(RC 0.4.21) crashed this morning. Unusual T. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend

Re: [Assp-test] Curious: crash

2009-10-08 Thread Charles Marcus
On 10/8/2009, Trevor Jacques (tre...@videlicet.com) wrote: After about ten days of solid performance, 2.0.1(RC 0.4.21) crashed this morning. Unusual What was the point of reporting this if you weren't going to provide details (logs, etc)?

Re: [Assp-test] Curious: crash

2009-10-08 Thread Trevor Jacques
What was the point of reporting this if you weren't going to provide details (logs, etc)? To see if anyone else might have had an unusual crash. That might point to something we should investigate. If it's just a random event on one box, it would be too difficult to sleuth. T.

Re: [Assp-test] Curious: crash

2009-10-08 Thread Trevor Jacques
After abthjout ten days of solid performance, 2.0.1(RC 0.4.21) crashed this morning. assp restarted again after my first post. Then, I noticed that checking mail has occasionally been a problem today, so I checked the worker status: 1 2103 s isnotspam (stuck) 2 6902 s

[Assp-test] ASSP 1.6.0(0.0.15)

2009-10-08 Thread Hill, Brett
I'm seeing entries in the headers that I'm not used to. The IP 74.125.78.149 is not in any of the below lists (that I'm aware of). This email is spam btw. X-Assp-whiteListedIPs: 74.125.78.149 X-Assp-ispip: 74.125.78.149 X-Assp-noPB: 74.125.78.149 X-Assp-noPBwhite: 74.125.78.149 X-Assp-noHelo:

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.6.0(0.0.15)

2009-10-08 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
That is a bug, it should befixed in (0.0.16) -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.6.0(0.0.15)

2009-10-08 Thread Scott Haneda
Hi Fritz. As you may remember, I am working on the Mac OS X package installer for ASSP, mainly just getting clean perl modules of exact and correct versions easily for OS X users. 1.5.1.1 is where I was targeting, but you have made a lot of progress since that release. Can you tell me

Re: [Assp-test] Curious: crash

2009-10-08 Thread Trevor Jacques
Yep. assp cannot handle some mail content: Oct-8-09 16:48:29 [Worker_3] Worker_3 wakes up Oct-8-09 16:48:29 [Worker_3] Info: Worker_3 got connection from MainThread Oct-8-09 16:48:29 [Main_Thread] Info: Main_Thread freed by idle Worker_3 in 0.007 seconds Oct-8-09 16:48:29 [Worker_3] Connected:

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.6.0(0.0.15)

2009-10-08 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 8, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: 1.5.1.1 is where I was targeting, but you have made a lot of progress since that release. Can you tell me what you are shooting for as an official release, would it

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Curious: crash

2009-10-08 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
Hi Trevor, Yep. assp cannot handle some mail content: Yes - how ever, assp stucks at some lines of code where our headerlines are merged to the mail header (some simple regexes). It must be mail content related. To fix this, I need the content of such email. Please do the following. -