>>at least the
>> address must match the condition in &localmail to get the
>> {islocalmailaddress} flag.
Forget all lines, except the last one - &localmail has to return 1 to
consider the address local - look in to your configuration.
Thomas
Andrew Porter
11.11.2009 23:06
Bitte antworte
Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
> (!$LocalAddresses_Flat or ! matchSL( $2, # (LocalAdr.. not
> used - but if used, the domain is NOT (!) found there and
> 'LocalAddresses_Flat' ) )
>
> As you can see - if LocalAddresses_Flat is not used . at least the
> address must match t
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.1_RC0.5.18
- GUI was not correctly shown in IE6 (possibly also in IE7) and IE8 in
compatibly(5/6/7) mode - a browser and javascript engine detection is done
to correct the wrong parsing of the old MS stuff
- a clean untie of BerkeleyDB hashes was not possible because of an
>This bit of code sets any address with a valid local domain to be a
>valid local email address. Which it should not do because the address
>is not listed in LocalAddresses_Flat.
This is a simple bool logic - let's have a look.
if (!$DoLDAP # no LDAP and
&&
On 11/11/2009, GrayHat (gray...@gmx.net) wrote:
> Yes, and in effect it seems quite similar to FBMTV now it's to see
> if the patent may be claimed or not but at any rate putting a patent
> on such a thing really SUCKS imHo
Exactly... this is like trying to patent swimming, its ridiculous. I
just
>> The beauty of this approach is that it doesn't mangle the sender
>> email address (as BATV does) so it eases dealing with email
>> addresses whitelists and so on while, at the same time, retaining
>> the same efficiency of BATV (ok, probably a better efficiency :D)
> As I said, this is virtual
Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
>> LocalAddresses_Flat - which is a list of email addresses not domains
>
> If an address exists in LocalAddresses_Flat, which contains a domain part
> '@example.com', than this domain is consider local.
So localDomains is obsoleted if LocalAddresses_Flat is used ?
Doe
On 11/11/2009, GrayHat (gray...@gmx.net) wrote:
> The beauty of this approach is that it doesn't mangle the sender
> email address (as BATV does) so it eases dealing with email
> addresses whitelists and so on while, at the same time, retaining
> the same efficiency of BATV (ok, probably a better e
How ever, this version seems to need to start from inside the assp
directory - just change your cron to change in to this directory first,
before perl ist started.
Thomas
Tim Jacob
11.11.2009 16:18
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
ASSP development mailing list
Kopie
> The idea is so simple, that it is possible, that some others
> have had it before. This does not matter - I have some less
> to do (the DRAFT) - but it works great in ASSP.
Just to wipe some "fog" :)
When sending a message through an FBMTV enabled ASSP
the latter will retrieve the original me
Just a wild stab in the dark Permissions??
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On 11.11.2009, at 18:20, "Tim Jacob" wrote:
> I am running RebuildSpamDB 2.6.0.1 (1.0.03) on a Linux box with assp
> 1.6.0(04.07).
> If I go to the assp subdirectory and type "perl rebuildspamdb.pl" it
> runs correctly.
>
I am running RebuildSpamDB 2.6.0.1 (1.0.03) on a Linux box with assp
1.6.0(04.07).
If I go to the assp subdirectory and type "perl rebuildspamdb.pl" it
runs correctly.
I set it up to run in cron every 12 hours. It used to work. Recently
it has stopped. I get the following message:
LWP::Simp
>LocalAddresses_Flat - which is a list of email addresses not domains
If an address exists in LocalAddresses_Flat, which contains a domain part
'@example.com', than this domain is consider local.
Thomas
Andrew Porter
11.11.2009 15:26
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
The idea is so simple, that it is possible, that some others have had it
before. This does not matter - I have some less to do (the DRAFT) - but it
works great in ASSP.
Thomas
Charles Marcus
11.11.2009 14:25
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list
An
ASSP development mailing li
Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
> A address with a local domain part is a local address - the code is OK as
> it is!
Yeah but this test is testing if @example.com exists in
LocalAddresses_Flat - which is a list of email addresses not domains -
if it is testing if the domain is local shouldn't it be l
On 11/11/2009, Thomas Eckardt/eck (thomas.ecka...@thockar.com) wrote:
> You'll notfind any RFC about FBMTV. This is an assp unique feature. Fritz
> and I hav'nt jet written a DRAFT to send it to IANA, to get the feature
> become a RFC.
> FBMTV is doing the same (and some more) like BATV with the
assp 1.6.1.1 build 0.0.01 line 23730
To start realtime maillog, click on [Auto], to stop realtime maillog,
click on [Stop]
But there is no auto or Stop buton to click
Regards,
Hilario Fochi Silveira
Soliton Controles Industriais Ltda.
Rua Alfredo Pujol, 1010
Sao Paulo - SP - BRAZIL
Tel: +
>Can you share the draft
>>Fritz and I hav'nt jet written a DRAFT
>or an outline
is not jet written
>or at the very least, what the
>problem is, what it solves, and how it solves it
What problem ?
If you want to know what FBMTV is for, read the DRAFT about BATV, the read
the GUI 'Backscatte
Can you share the draft, or an outline, or at the very least, what the
problem is, what it solves, and how it solves it. Thank you.
--
Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ *
On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
> You'll notfind any RFC about FBM
19 matches
Mail list logo
