[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: minor suggestion: admin interface

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
If there are all features enabled - there is no space left anywhere in the GUI. Moving the buttons in to the header line of the main form, will remove them from all other screens, because this line is not part of the HTML/JS that is used in every screen. Or all other screens have to be changed.

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from i

2009-11-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >My followup was about headerre (not bomb) I do not know "headerre (not bomb) " -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from i

2009-11-16 Thread Scott Haneda
Yep, you nailed it, it is impossible to follow a conversion when subjects keep getting longer and longer and longer and the different ways in which apps thread those. I do not even have a unique subject to sort/search on, as it is ever changing, and concatenates with each post. Why does it

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from i

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
No sir Fritz, I never ignore your posts, they're always appreciated and helpful. Your post about the bombheaderre and bombsenderre was crystal clear. My followup was about headerre (not bomb) and I was then replying to Thomas' post that said "yes" when his further clarification really meant "no."

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: minor suggestion: admin interface

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
If you mean that the line where I'm suggesting it go might be too long, wouldn't it just wrap to the next line? If that's not where you think it should go, what about right under the version information at the top. even if there's a new version announcement there, there is still a 3rd line with s

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from i

2009-11-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: > Ok, then "No." Your yes answer before confused me. Obviously you choose to ignore my posts. >bombHeaderRe = Regular Expression to Identify Spam in Header Part >bombSenderRe = Regular Expression to Identify Spam in Envelope > (mailfrom, ip and helo) -

[Assp-test] Antwort: minor suggestion: admin interface

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
>1) Move the apply and logout button to the right of ASSP (as a >service) - Configuration This is not possible, this line is a status line and is possibly completely used - depending on GUI action and/or the status of ASSP. Thomas K Post 16.11.2009 19:28 Bitte antworten an ASSP development

[Assp-test] ASSP 1.6.1.1(0.0.03) Problems

2009-11-16 Thread Hill, Brett
I upgraded from 1.6.1.0(1.0.00) to 1.6.1.1(0.0.03) and shortly thereafter ASSP started accumulating connections up to my maximum number of 20 (which it never does except when ASSP is having problems). It then started limiting connections. Kind Regards, Brett -

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex qu

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
Ok, then "No." Your yes answer before confused me. thanks On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck < thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > only the header! > > > > > K Post > 16.11.2009 19:08 > Bitte antworten an > ASSP development mailing list > > > An > ASSP development mailing li

[Assp-test] minor suggestion: admin interface

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
We can save the space above the left menu pretty easily. 1) Move the apply and logout button to the right of ASSP (as a service) - Configuration change $currStat ASSP$runas - Configuration ($WebIP{$ActWebIP}->{user})$networkatt to be $currStat ASSP$runas - Configuration ($WebIP{$ActWebIP}->{user

[Assp-test] Antwort: debug_sub.txt

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
The debug code in disabled in 0.5.22 . Thomas K Post 16.11.2009 19:10 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema [Assp-test] debug_sub.txt With 2.0.1 rc 0.5.21 I'm getting a debug_sub.txt file in the installation directory. It se

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex qu

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
only the header! K Post 16.11.2009 19:08 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex qu On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Thomas Eckardt/ec

[Assp-test] debug_sub.txt

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
With 2.0.1 rc 0.5.21 I'm getting a debug_sub.txt file in the installation directory. It seems that some of the flagged messages, those that have the spam subject prepended to the subject, are appearing in this debug file. Is this someting new? Reason for concern? Thanks

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Bareword found where operator expected

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
Nope. Nothing. I'll keep watching. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote: > Is there anything in file exception.log - it is written if a worker dies > on an error? > > How ever, without any more information, it is hard to find the reason. > > > Thomas > > > > > K Post > 16

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex qu

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote: >>Will HeaderRe look at mail-from? > > Yes, headerRe is doing the header part of a mail. But mail-from is in the envelope. I'm trying to determine if like BombHeaderRe, headerRe only looks at the header (that text recieved after the DAT

[Assp-test] Antwort: Bareword found where operator expected

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
Is there anything in file exception.log - it is written if a worker dies on an error? How ever, without any more information, it is hard to find the reason. Thomas K Post 16.11.2009 18:47 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema [A

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex qu

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
>Will HeaderRe look at mail-from? Yes, headerRe is doing the header part of a mail. Thomas K Post 16.11.2009 18:42 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema Re: [Assp-test] Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also reg

[Assp-test] Bareword found where operator expected

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
I had assp running in console after installing 2.0.1 rc 0.5.21 (win32), just for the sake of watching it. Worked fine, but, I was seeing: Bareword found where operator expected every so often. I thought I had copied the exact message, but lost it. It also showed the filename of the message in th

Re: [Assp-test] Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex qu

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
OH, so bombSenderRe doesn't look at the from: line. Good to know. Will HeaderRe look at mail-from? On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ASSP development mailing list > schreibt: >>I'd like some clarification to see if headerRe (and BomgHeaderRe) are >>only checking the e

[Assp-test] fixes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.22

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
fixed: - X-Assp-Envelope-From: and X-Assp-Intended-For: where not processed in every resend-mail case - ISP connections where closed after an detected SPAM even if a '250 OK' was sent and ISP tried to sent more than one mail inside a connection fixed in ARC-plugin: - openssl was unable to

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: How to fix Error

2009-11-16 Thread Daniel K. Du Vall
Thanks Daniel Du Vall http://1peter4-10.org http://volkswageninsanity.us -Original Message- From: Thomas Eckardt/eck [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 10:01 AM To: ASSP development mailing list Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: How to fix Error

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: How to fix Error

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
How ever - it is the time, that is taken by the system 'poll' call on a socket - you may try to switch the IO-engine to 'IO::Select' -- there is no more we can do. Thomas "Daniel K. Du Vall" 16.11.2009 17:55 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An "ASSP development mailing

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: How to fix Error

2009-11-16 Thread Daniel K. Du Vall
Happening way too often. That is the problem. System is not show high CPU usage. Daniel Du Vall http://1peter4-10.org http://volkswageninsanity.us -Original Message- From: Thomas Eckardt/eck [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 9:38 AM To: ASSP development

Re: [Assp-test] [ASSP] Logging

2009-11-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >It's possible to disable logging of: >matches @mydomain.it in LocalAddresses_Flat ? - Regular Expression to Suppress Log-Messages* (noLogLineRe) Put anything here to identify log messages that you want to be suppressed. For example: max errors|collect|Il

[Assp-test] Antwort: How to fix Error

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
Too high CPU load - ignore this if it happens not too often and assp is doing it's job. The real reason will be hard to find. Thomas "Daniel K. Du Vall" 16.11.2009 17:16 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An Kopie Thema [Assp-test] How to fix Error Have been gettin

[Assp-test] [ASSP] Logging

2009-11-16 Thread Jacopo Cappelli
It's possible to disable logging of: matches @mydomain.it in LocalAddresses_Flat ? Thanks, Jacopo -- Linux, Windows Xp ed MS-DOS (anche conosciuti come il Bello, il Brutto ed il Cattivo). -- Matt Welsh -- Let Crystal Rep

[Assp-test] How to fix Error

2009-11-16 Thread Daniel K. Du Vall
Have been getting this message and not sure how to get rid of it Any ideas? System is a 2ghz duel Opteron with 2GB ram Nov-16-09 08:56:55 [Main_Thread] Warning: poll cycle has taken 6.8349609375 seconds - it is too long Daniel Du Vall http://1peter4-10.org http:/

[Assp-test] Antwort: Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex question

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
>I think we should change the admin console to make this clear. This is clear enough. Header meens header not handshake or SMTP command ( envelope)! >Would this require that all three of these item appear (40 character >mail-f...@email.capitalone.com, from: >captital...@email.capitalone.com, and

Re: [Assp-test] Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex qu

2009-11-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >I'd like some clarification to see if headerRe (and BomgHeaderRe) are >only checking the envelope bombHeaderRe = Regular Expression to Identify Spam in Header Part bombSenderRe = Regular Expression to Identify Spam in Envelope (mailfrom, ip and helo)

[Assp-test] Does headerRe also check mail-from in the envelope? also regex question

2009-11-16 Thread K Post
I'd like some clarification to see if headerRe (and BomgHeaderRe) are only checking the envelope or if they check what I'm calling the message header (FROM: SUBJECT:, etc that is recorded after the DATA line is sent in the SMTP session). I think we should change the admin console to make this clea

[Assp-test] Some default settings

2009-11-16 Thread Alex Frunza
Hi, I'm thinking some default settings should be changed, especially since most people probably use ASSP "as is" and they can cause false positives/negatives. NoProcessingIps - the ipnp file has the Gmail server IP's in it, and alot of spam comes from gmail and it will just go through ASSP with

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Feauture request whitelist testing

2009-11-16 Thread Steve Mallindine
Ok - Answered my own question In SQL DB, in whitelist table, pvalue is the unixtimeformat for the date/time of whitelist addition Steve On 11/16/09 11:41 AM, "Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve Mallindine)" wrote: > When using SQL, is the date stored in pvalue? > > Cheers > > Steve > > >

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Feauture request whitelist testing

2009-11-16 Thread Steve Mallindine
When using SQL, is the date stored in pvalue? Cheers Steve On 11/16/09 11:24 AM, "Thomas Eckardt/eck" wrote: > There is no need to do this. If you check a address for any list - the > timestamp for the listentry is set to the current time and expires like > configured. > > Thomas > > > >

[Assp-test] Antwort: isip addresses is Bayesian Checked, is this intentional?

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
>isip addresses is Bayesian Checked, is this intentional? Yes. If a CIP is found, this ip is used. Thomas Anders Westin 16.11.2009 08:40 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema [Assp-test] isip addresses is Bayesian Checked, is th

Re: [Assp-test] isip addresses is Bayesian Checked, is this intentional?

2009-11-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >isip addresses is Bayesian Checked, is this intentional? Yes. ISPIP will be checked by content related filters. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Report

[Assp-test] Antwort: Feauture request whitelist testing

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
There is no need to do this. If you check a address for any list - the timestamp for the listentry is set to the current time and expires like configured. Thomas Anders Westin 16.11.2009 08:13 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Them