ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Are you referring to 2.0.0.5 or a dev build?
2.0.05 and dev build
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https:/
Are you referring to 2.0.0.5 or a dev build?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: Fritz Borgstedt
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
> Date:
Great, Thanks fritz!
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: Fritz Borgstedt
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:45:
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>It there any way to make sure these files stay available for the 30
>days?
MaxKeepDeleted does not prevent overwriting of mails by newly stored
mails if numbers are use as filename.
In the newest version I changed the logic to prevent overwriting for
at le
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.1.01:
- If someone uses 'web.de' as ISP - assp was unable to detect the
orginating IP and helo - because the received header of web.de is somehow
different..
changed :
'bombCharSets','Regular Expression to Identify Foreign Charsets**'
Part of DoBombHeaderRe: header w
It there any way to make sure these files stay available for the 30 days?
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: "Paul K. Dickson"
> Reply-To: ASSP de
>Does this mean that that IP is erroneously whitelisted in the AHBL
>RWL?
I saw this on my system this morning (while testing a new release) - but
the mail reached the PB and was blocked. Is there a problem with '
exemptions.ahbl.org' ?
Thomas
Von:K Post
An: ASSP development mailing
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Not sure what the griplist score is all about.
101:
The Griplist contains IP numbers and their value between 0 and 1,
lower is less spammy, higher is more spammy.
0.76 is quite spammy, but the formula assigns only big scores to
gripvalues above 0.9, so her
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Does this mean that that IP is erroneously whitelisted in the AHBL
>RWL?
yes
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.
Yeah. FWIW I have both RWL and GRIP turned off which has resulting in much
better accuracy. YMMV.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: K Post
> Re
We had a spam message slip though (lots of good text then a large PDF
attachment).
In the headers, I see:
X-ASSP-Received-RWL: whitelisted from (exemptions.ahbl.org->127.0.0.2;
) - high trust is 2 - client-ip=84.113.63.82
X-ASSP-Message-Score: 1 (84.113.63 in griplist (0.76))
Does this mean that
I¹m trying to look at several email¹s blocked in the last 24 hours and some
of them are coming up as completely different than what the report shows
when I click on ³Show File² in the report email. I have both
MaxNoBayesFileAge and MaxKeepDeleted set to 30.
Running 1.7.1.4 2.0.0.4
Paul K. Dic
12 matches
Mail list logo
