On 5/20/2011 9:58 AM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
> We have an MTA on the edge through which all mail flows (and ASSP is behind
> it).
>
> Is there a way for Assp to strip off the last MTA IP/Hostname for bad host
> checks, etc?
>
> (I posted this a month ago to the -test list but got no response...so
--- On Thu, 26/5/11, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> From: Thomas Eckardt
> Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: yet another way of passing spam
> To: "ASSP development mailing list"
> Date: Thursday, 26 May, 2011, 19:25
> use
>
> DoNoSpoofing
> noSpoofingCheckIP
> noSpoofingCheckDomain
>
> will solve it.
use
DoNoSpoofing
noSpoofingCheckIP
noSpoofingCheckDomain
will solve it.
Thomas
Von:Spyros Tsiolis
An: ASSP User List
Datum: 26.05.2011 11:07
Betreff:[Assp-test] yet another way of passing spam
Hello list,
OK, the other day about 12 receipients received an unwanted
me
possibly there an (/o) too much in the code - will fix it in the next
version.
Thomas
Von:K Post
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 26.05.2011 15:15
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] block reporting 2.0.2 3.0.2x
-bump-
Anyone else seeing this?
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:5
ist the list defined in 'BlockReportFilter' or as extension to a block
report request?
Thomas
Von:K Post
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 26.05.2011 15:15
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] block reporting 2.0.2 3.0.2x
-bump-
Anyone else seeing this?
On Tue, May 24, 2011
-bump-
Anyone else seeing this?
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:50 PM, K Post wrote:
> Is it possible that the newer versions of ASSP have started to ignore
> BlockReportFilter? I've got DNSBL|username1|username2 in there, but lines
> with those matches seem to appear in block reports now. They di
Hello list,
OK, the other day about 12 receipients received an unwanted
message from .ru .
The structure of the message was this :
from: all 12 receipients proper e-mail addresses
to : all 12 receipients proper e-mail addresses
Then the message.
I would like to forward this to the list, howeve
