[Assp-test] IP detection error

2011-11-15 Thread Henrik Pihl
Hello, Message attached, today I noticed a strange DenyStrict parsing error - the four digit version number is detected as an IP, which is blocked by default (1.0.0.0/8). Currently I have commented out that IP range but that isn't really a permanent solution. Bug? Or a feature? Running ASSP versio

Re: [Assp-test] reporting spam 1.9.1.8(1.1.02)

2011-11-15 Thread Graziano
Hello I tested it some day 1.9.5.0 (0.0.10) with rebuildspamdb 2.9.5.0. I noticed an increase of spam passing (from none/rare to 6-8 per day) and the reason is always due to the negative score (I suppose due to spamdberror) . X-Assp-Score: 43 (Bayesian Probability: 0.9825) X-Assp-Score: -9 (

Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x

2011-11-15 Thread Hill, Brett
> -Original Message- > From: Hill, Brett [mailto:hil...@nlbusa.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:04 PM > To: ASSP development mailing list > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x > > I'm just trying to stress that I know it's whitelisted (by giving y

Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x

2011-11-15 Thread Hill, Brett
> -Original Message- > From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:14 PM > To: ASSP development mailing list > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x > > ASSP development mailing list > schreibt: > >Lastly, if I find i

Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x

2011-11-15 Thread Hill, Brett
> -Original Message- > From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:13 PM > To: ASSP development mailing list > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x > > The analyzer shows the addresses like this: > > > General Hints

Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x

2011-11-15 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >Lastly, if I find in the GUI log where the email was processed and >click >the email address, it gives me the option to remove from the >whitelist, >not add. It will give you the options which are possibe. If it is on whitelist, you can only remove. --

Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x

2011-11-15 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >4. ASSP Analyzer (I've noticed that if ASSP recognizes an address as >whitelisted, it will add it to the Feature Matching section of the >Analyzer output as Whitelisted, The analyzer shows the addresses like this: General Hints: ASSP-ID: ASSP.nospam

[Assp-test] Problem with ASSP v1.9 connection

2011-11-15 Thread James Moe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 opensuse v11.4 linux 2.6.37.6-0.9-desktop x86_64 perl v5.12.3 built for x86_64-linux-thread-multi ASSP has stopping transferring messages. This started after a system upgrade. Below are log files from the user agent, ASSP, and the transfer agent. The

Re: [Assp-test] Whitelisted Addresses Revisited - ASSP 1.9.x

2011-11-15 Thread Hill, Brett
Ok, it's still happening. I'm going to attempt to give you everything that I can think of to help troubleshoot this. Bare in mind that do-not-re...@email.globalspec.com is already whitelisted. Also, names and IP's have been changed. 1. ASSP Log here: http://pastebin.com/t2DC3cvM 2. ASSP Discar

Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changes in assp 2.1.2 build 11319

2011-11-15 Thread Peter W Bowey
> Hi all, > > fixed in assp 2.1.2 build 11319: Many thanks! Looks good so far Thomas! Testing it heavily now under my fully updated Fedora 15 Linux! "ASSP-professional version 2.1.2(11319) (Perl 5.012004) (on linux) initializing" Peter -

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Strange output of ps (ProcessStatus) command under FreeBSD

2011-11-15 Thread GrayHat
> I need a feedback, if build 11319 fixes this issue. Testing it right now; sounds like it's working fine; will report back as soon as I'll have further data, as I wrote it's not "constant", the issue seems to only surface from time to time, so I'll need to wait a bit -

[Assp-test] 1.9.x likely bug with dnsbl

2011-11-15 Thread marrco
I did a few tests, and it seems to me that (everything else unchanged) with 1.9.x zen.spamhaus.org=>1|bl.spamcop.net=>1|bb.barracudacentral.org=>1|combined.nj abl.org=>1 works fine but zen.spamhaus.org|bl.spamcop.net|bb.barracudacentral.org|combined.njabl.org doesn't work ---

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Strange output of ps (Process Status) command under FreeBSD

2011-11-15 Thread Michael M Galapchuk
> I need a feedback, if build 11319 fixes this issue. Yes, it fixes this issue under FreeBSD. Uptime now about 1 hour, ps output: PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND 33845 0 SJ20:08,14 /usr/bin/perl /usr/local/share/assp/assp.pl MainLoop - next: Tue Nov 15 16:57:10 2011 (perl) Thanks a

Re: [Assp-test] Some questions about Message Scoring

2011-11-15 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >2. Message is stored in discarded folder because messagescore (48) >low. >Why after that message is stored in notspam folder by MessageOK? That log entry means, that you have set up : ->PenaltyMessageLow MessageMode will not block messages whose score exc

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Strange output of ps (Process Status) command under FreeBSD

2011-11-15 Thread Thomas Eckardt
I need a feedback, if build 11319 fixes this issue. Thomas Von:Michael M Galapchuk An: ASSP development mailing list Datum: 15.11.2011 08:41 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Strange output of ps (Process Status) command under FreeBSD > It looks like your system shows

[Assp-test] Antwort: Some questions about Message Scoring

2011-11-15 Thread Thomas Eckardt
>1. Why this message passing, when [PenaltyBox] totalscore for 195.149.248.140 is 148? >DoPenalty:=2 set it to 1 (block) There are two penalties: message -> DoPenaltyMessage (accumulated per mail) IP -> DoPenalty (accumulated per IP) 148 < 150 (PenaltyExtreme:=150 / DoPenaltyExtreme:=1) - T

[Assp-test] fixes and changes in assp 2.1.2 build 11319

2011-11-15 Thread Thomas Eckardt
Hi all, fixed in assp 2.1.2 build 11319: - on some linux OS the process name was wrong modified by the module Schedule::Cron - like > 3485 v0- SJ 104:18,29 /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl > /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl > /usr/local/share/as

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Strange output of ps (Process Status)command under FreeBSD

2011-11-15 Thread Thomas Eckardt
>I wonder if this may be related to "mainthread stuck" and No, this is done by the module Schedule::Cron . This module modifies the global variable $0 (the own script name), even if the 'run' call is not detached. In case the scheduler is configured, every call to Schedule::Cron::run expands th