Re: [Assp-test] >50 points but not tagged as spam (one in maybe hundret emails)

2012-12-11 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >ad...@mydomain.org Message-Score: added 50 for PTR invalid >'h147.151.16.98.dynamic.ip.windstream.net', total score for this >message is now 67; Please look into the header if PTR invalid is really the scoring reason. Is ptiValence really set to 50? Defau

[Assp-test] >50 points but not tagged as spam (one in maybe hundret emails)

2012-12-11 Thread krz...@gmail.com
Dec-12-12 00:36:26 98.16.151.147 to: ad...@mydomain.org Message-Score: added 7 for bombSubjectRe: 'waiting (7)', total score for this message is now 7; Dec-12-12 00:36:26 [BombSubject] 98.16.151.147 to: ad...@mydomain.org [scoring:7] -- bombSubjectRe: 'waiting (7)' -- [Your new intimate life is w

[Assp-test] Assp Is relaying

2012-12-11 Thread Matti Haack
Hello, I have problems to find out, why these connections are allowed reiyoga is not a local domain at all (and of coure hotmial not) and we are not releying for 187.23.173.200 Is there a way to find out, why this sender is allowed to send without auth? Dez-11-12 17:07:26 [Worker_1] 187.23.173.2

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: (feature resuest) noDelaySPF - read from specified domains SPF

2012-12-11 Thread Thomas Eckardt
As I told you, every server (except those in an exception list like noDelayIP, NPIP, WLIP ...) will be delayed at least one time, If the server has passed the delaying and the domain provides a SPF-record and the server has passed the SPF check with 'SPF-pass' - the server will be no longer dela

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: (feature resuest) noDelaySPF - read from specified domains SPF

2012-12-11 Thread Thomas Eckardt
Every CIDR less than /8 in a SPF record is detected as SPAM-SPF-record by assp and processed as SPF-fail. Thomas Von:"krz...@gmail.com " An: ASSP development mailing list , Datum: 11.12.2012 03:40 Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: (feature resuest) noDelaySPF - read from sp