Curious about this one. .35 is our SMTP server. If unkn...@ourcharity.org
isn't in LocalAddresses_Flat (which is what we use), shoudln't it be ASSP
that's rejecting the user, not the real SMTP server? (have I lost my mind?)
Sep-15-15 17:15:58 msg52358-04911 61.xx.xx.xx to:
unkn...@ourcharity.o
Seems like if I let ASSP 15255 run long enough, the RWL/RBL errors also
come back. This was never a problem with 15167. I haven't tried rolling
back yet, but suspect that the problem would go away with that older
version.
I will try turning off DNSReuseSocket. I seem to remember that being a
pr
and this
error: Worker_1 accept to client failed IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x38b822ec)
(timeout: 2 s) : A connection attempt failed because the connected party
did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection
failed because connected host has failed to respond.
On Tue, Sep
Got this error again when opening the web interface but closing it
immediately (I went to the wrong site by mistake)
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:36 AM, K Post wrote:
> I was searching my logs using the GUI, and mistakenly put the last 100
> files instead of the last 10 and had 1000 matches lists.
I've restarted several more times. I haven't changed any settings, but the
RWL/RBL errors seem to have gone away. Bad cache or something? I am
getting occasional warnings in the log that Name Server x.x.x.x does not
respond or timed out.
I can't imagine that it's suddenly the name servers. It'
ah, ah, ah. Clear. thanks.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Eckardt
wrote:
> Several configuration parameters contains (or can contain) security data
> like user names, passwords, certificates, cert-keys and so on. The values
> of all those parameters are stored encrypted in assp.cfg.
>
Hi all,
I've developed an extension for the ASSP_AFC.pm plugin - ASSP_AFCSMIME.
This extension makes it possible to SMIME sign all or specified corporate
or privat emails with a single certificate, instead having a privat
certficate for each user.
The first version of this feature was developed
