:: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 12:37:26 -0400
::
:: K Post wrote:
> Windows 2012 R2
> the certificate is a 2048 bit RSA cert
>
> SSL_Version is SSLv23:!SSLv3:!SSLv2
> Cipher list
> is
> kEECDH+ECDSA:kEECDH:kEDH:HIGH:+SHA:+RC4:RC4:!aNULL:!eNULL:!LOW:!3DES:!MD5:!EXP:!DSS:!PSK:!SRP:!kECDH:!CAMELLIA128:!IDE
That makes sense, I was just playing with high and low values to see if
there's any difference.
I don't know what else to do. Really need TLS on, but major ISP's are
giving up on us, especially Google who won't stay connected for more than 5
minutes or so. That's not enough time to transmit a lar
Windows 2012 R2 has at least a system TCP receive and send buffer of 64KB.
The max frame size for SSL is 16384 byte (16KB). If you set the SSL
receive buffer for assp to 8192 , there will be 8192 byte left in the
SSL-read-buffer after reading - assp warns about this and reads until the
SSL-read
921600 isn't markedly different gives me something like 1.5 to 2 MB per
minute. I am using just the shutdown list and watching the bytes and time
to get the estimate.
I can enable debugging to get a more precise number, but it's a moot point
I think - without TLS, I just watched an 11mb attachment
and no, no other AV on the machine.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Grayhat wrote:
> :: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:27:28 +0200
> :: <20160609172728.0...@gmx.net>
> :: Grayhat wrote:
>
> > also, what OS are you running on ?
>
> I mean windows version, btw; also, is the box also running an AV (ot
Windows 2012 R2
the certificate is a 2048 bit RSA cert
SSL_Version is SSLv23:!SSLv3:!SSLv2
Cipher list
is
kEECDH+ECDSA:kEECDH:kEDH:HIGH:+SHA:+RC4:RC4:!aNULL:!eNULL:!LOW:!3DES:!MD5:!EXP:!DSS:!PSK:!SRP:!kECDH:!CAMELLIA128:!IDEA:!SEED
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Grayhat wrote:
> :: On Wed, 1
Also, I tried setting all to 8192 and got lots of messages in the log like
warning: there are 7268 byte pending in SSL buffer - this should not happen
Turned tls off again for now.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:52 AM, K Post wrote:
> Updated to the newest version.
>
> When I did
> sslrcv = 0, ssl
Just made a test with my nice very old windows 2003 Sp1. It runs the
default system TCP buffers at 8KB. The max wirespeed for this system is
16MBit/s inbound and 6MBit/s outbound. There is alot of other stuff using
this line.
Doing a mail with SSLin and SSLout to the ISP and back, I get the
fo
:: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:27:28 +0200
:: <20160609172728.0...@gmx.net>
:: Grayhat wrote:
> also, what OS are you running on ?
I mean windows version, btw; also, is the box also running an AV (other
than the ClamD used by ASSP) and if yes, which one ?
:: On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:55:00 -0400
::
:: K Post wrote:
> Could this be the problem? Is OpenSSL even used by ASSP for receiving
> email? I feel like it's not, but thought I'd put this out there.
What do you have in SSL_version and SSL_cipher_list ?
If empty, try the following config
SSL_ve
I'm sorry my fault - 99 is the hardcoded maximum at the moment. Use
921600 (900 KB) for all settings.
>transferring at around 1.25MB per minute
You've got the value from the connection screen? Looks very slow.
with SessionLog set to diagnostic
you'll see the message in the log:
. info:
Updated to the newest version.
When I did
sslrcv = 0, sslsnd=0
I get, in green:
*** Updated TCPBufferSize - TCP Receive Buffer is set to 65536 byte(note
missing line break)
*TCPBufferSize - TCP Send Buffer is set to 65536 byte*
*TCPBufferSize - SSL Receive Buffer is set to 65536 byte*
*TCPBuf
Install 2.5.2(16158)
set 'TCPBufferSize' to : sslrcv = 0, sslsnd = 0
tell me if TLS speed is better or not
set 'TCPBufferSize' to : tcprcv = 1024000 , tcpsnd = 1024000 ,sslrcv =
1024000, sslsnd = 1024000
are there any performance improvements?
Thomas
Von:K Post
An: ASSP developm
13 matches
Mail list logo
