ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Apr-20-14 06:42:08 m1-68927-23679 [Worker_1] [TLS-out] 83.103.59.89 <
>biblioteca.nervi...@csbno.net> to: m...@me.tld Message-Score: added 49
>(pbeValencePB) for Extreme Bad History (83.103.59.89)->(3815), total
>score
>for this message is now 49
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Are they getting sent to proper user first?
'discarded','The folder to save (virtually) discarded messages. In
earlier versions of ASSP messages were physically deleted if the
settings were set so. This is no longer possible because there is now
a resend
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Are they getting sent to proper user first?
The collect folders store mails after sending to recipients. You may
change the folder to "notspam folder" in noProcessingLog if you want
to include noprocessing mails in spamdb building.
---
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Why do NoprocessingOK IP's go to discarded folder?
Because noProcessingLog is set so.
NoProcessing Non Spam (noProcessingLog, default=discard folder)
Where to store noprocessing non spam messages.
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>
>This never appeared before the update, however I cannot find any
>personal
>blacklist options in the settings for any account?
Spam/NotSpam Report will modify Personal Blacklist *
(EmailErrorsModifyPersBlack)
Spam Reports will add email addresses to
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I saw in a recent post that there is a conf parameter called
>AUTHLogPWD
>but it's not present in my assp.cfg
# hidden config variables that could be changed using the module
CorrectASSPcfg.pm
# or that could be changed using a commandline switch like
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>It now gives me exactly the credentials being used...
ASSP gives you all credentials if you set it to do so.
--
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Feb-21-14 17:44:09 [Worker_2] [TLS-out] 116.203.191.142 info:
>authentication - plain is used
>Feb-21-14 17:44:09 [Worker_2] [TLS-out] 116.203.191.142 [SMTP Reply]
>235 2.7.0 Authentication successful
Set AUTHLogPWD to see the Password.
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Where is this personal blacklist? I have not seen this before and
>cannot
>find a personal blacklist for my email in the interface.
GUI-> Email Interface
Spam/NotSpam Report will modify Personal Blacklist *
(EmailErrorsModifyPersBlack, default=*@*)
Spa
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Where can we download the new version?
http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp2/
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesse
rne...@ringofsaturn.com schreibt:
>I know that there is another field that can be used
>_(denySMTPConnectionsFrom)_ but using it is not nearly as easy as I have
>to copy the IP, scroll down to the configuration item and paste it on
>the end, vs the other where I can just click on the IP and add it
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>ASSP Version: 1.9.9(14018)
>Where is the following scoring setting? I have several iphone users
>that
>send photos with no subject.
GUI:
Check Number of Same Subjects (DoSameSubject)
Scoring is done with isValencePB.
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>What i'm missing is some feature that forces the resend to the
>original
>sender for a list of users (ora a full domain or whatelse)...
The feature exists, but is possible for EmailAdmins only. Put a *
into EmailAdmins.
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
> *EmailSpam*
What is the content of EmailSpam ?
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how applic
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Send me an email if you are interested in this appliance.
>I plan to charge a fee of some Euro for the SD-card, shipment and my
>effort.
Ich wäre interessiert für unser Produktionssystem, bisher gibt es da
kein Unix System. Wieviel kostet es und wohin sc
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>not sure of the Safari version
>numbers
l
The problem started with the update to 6.1. It can be solved by
deinstalling 6.1 and reinstalling the 6.05 version.
This solution is not possible with 7.0. (part of Mavericks)
-
>Latest, Mavericks...
I tested V1 and V2 in Safari7 in Maverick, both show the spinning ball
when first time clicked on a link.
The webcontent-safari will keep the GUI in that state and then let it
go after 4 minutes. Closing the window and open it will produce the
same thing. I guess it is som
What version is your Safari istallation, which OSX version?
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, a
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Thats not right because I
>would like to sendAllSpam to catch all spam but I only want to collect
>from specific filters for building spamdb and on some servers even not
>collect spam to files at all
ASSP allows in the collect section the setting of colle
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>That's the only relevant block of info I could get hold of.
the filepath to the logfile is normally set in ->filepath/logfile
did you never use "View Maillog Tail" ?
--
October W
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Sep-30-13 09:20:00 Info: watching the running script
ASSP is restarting multiple times here because somebody changed
assp.pl
set AutoRestartAfterCodeChange to empty
uncheck ForceRestartAfterCodeChange
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Hi Fritz,
>
>Here it is. Very interesting. It seems it checked for updates four of
>five times ?
When I wrote including the line "info:
/usr/local/assp/rebuildspamdb.pl 13177 is current"
I meant from the start.
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I disabled auto-update but didn't revert to the old version.
>I am waiting to see how it will behave, for as far as I can tell,
>the process dies on upgrades.
Show me the log after a normal restart up to the line:
"Info: /Applications/assp/rebuildspamdb.
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>is perl v5.008008 adequate for v1.9.9 ?
I am not testing it on 5.08, there is no server in my installation
with such old version of perl. But there are certainly hundreds of
installions which run on 5.08.
ASSP produces a list of module at start, that is
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I think I am going to go with the built-in feature.
It would be better to run a not "dying" version. the versions which
are "dying" in your installatio are not known for that behaviout. Is
there nothing in the log? Did you run it in Terminal mode?
Better
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I use monit to watch ASSP.
>
>Doug
ASSP 1.9.9 has a builtin watchdog.
Section: Automatic Update / Restart:
-Enable Watchdog (EnableWatchdog)
-Restart/Kill after this many Seconds (WatchdogHeartBeat)
-Kill & Restart (WatchdogRestart)
Enabling this
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>how about adding a foreignfrom feature as well.. still getting a few
>spams
>that do not match the foreignto
Do Local Domain Check for FROM: address (CheckLocalFromDomain)
If activated, FROM: must have a valid Local Domain
-
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Is there anything I can do ?
Look in folder assp/download. ASSP placed the replaced version in it.
Use it to restore your old running version.
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Again, as far as I know, It just can't go outside
>and get any updates it desires. . . .
Disable AutoUpdate if you do not want it. AutoUpdateASSP->no auto
update
--
LIMITED TIME
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>I don't know if this ever got answered (probably, but I don't see
>it.) But
>it can be fixed by changing the above to:
>
> if ($DoOrgWhiting) {
>if ( $orgname =~ /'(' . $whiteSenderBaseRE . ')'/
> || $domainname =~ /'('
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>Can this be the same problem I have?
>My headline was "100% CPU usage after Update to 1.9.9(13245)"
>from yesterday in Assp-user
>
>I have now downgraded to Version 1.99(13107), and it works again.
No, this cannot be the same problem. I cannot reproduc
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>Still on v1 of ASSP
what version?
--
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft techno
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>The value of LocalAddresses_Flat in the master's config file is
>'file:files/localdomains.txt',
It seems not correct that LocalAddresses_Flat is called
file:files/localdomains.txt
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Sourceforge is only showing 13217
Sorry obviously you are using V2.
My recommendation was for V1.
--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free tro
Update to 13224.
--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for f
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Sure I could block it even with iptables.
May be, you can ip-forward with iptables the ip from lstenport do
smtpDestination, thereby passing ASSP for this special IP.
--
See ever
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Sure I could block it even with iptables. But why? I see there were
>many non-crashing mails from this IP in the past. I see also that some
>of my users sent mail to this mailserver so I would block their return
>comunication chanell.
This IP is sending o
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>176.9.34.204
Put this ip into denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways and set
DoDenySMTPstrict to "block".
--
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-en
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>If assp has problem with characters beyond asci then perhaps it should
>test incoming email for !preg_match("/[a-z0-9]"/)- or something like
>that. If incoming email (or smtp protocol message) has other
>characters than standard asci table - close connectio
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Is
>there any way to collect by assp this email from
>e-biule...@elektroinzynieria.pl?
The mail crashed in/after Bayes. Bayes ist the last check.
The standard way to put e-biule...@elektroinzynieria.pl into
"blackListedDomains"
should work if "DoBlackDoma
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>~95% (but not all) segfaults (crasheh) occured after " Bayesian Check
>- Prob: 0.0". I've tested with "stock" spamdb - same thing. I've
>disabled bayesian filtering now - we'll see if assp stop crashing. Is
>there any way to collect by assp this email f
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Also line ~18259 of assp.pl look like this:
>
>if ($DoOrgWhiting) {
>if ( $orgname =~ ( '(' . $whiteSenderBaseRE . ')' )
>|| $domainname =~ ( '(' . $whiteSenderBaseRE . ')' )
>|| $domainname =~ ( '(' . $WLDRE .
Sorry; I have difficulties to find the problem.
m/((?^:(?is)(\bpaypal\.com|\bfacebook\.com|\bamazon\.com|\bdotpay\.pl)(?{length($1)>32?substr($1,0,32-3).'...':$1})))/
what regex is that? may be you look for \bdotpay\.pl
---
pPlease look for the last lines in maillog trail before some of the
segment faults and show them here.
You may find yourself the mail which is causing it and put something
suitable into preHeaderRe.
preHeaderRe:
It is possible, that some content (malformed headers, forbidden
characters or char
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>[RelayAttempt] . relay attempt blocked for: recipient>
>
>So it doesn't seem to work to me, maybe i have to change other
>parameters?
I did not realize, that you do not have localDomains filled.
In this case set nolocalDomains.
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Is there something that I've missed or not configured properly? Do you
>have any suggestion to make a simple config like "ALL => 111.222.33.4"
>work like in 1.9.x?
A very simple solution for your configuration would be to skip any
recipient validation in
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I don't want to penalize mails that are coming from and going to the
>same domain. These are probably legitimate. I only want to penalize
>it if the mail appears to be coming from the same domain whilst the
>real address is obfuscated.
You can probabl
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Some of my recipients receive spoofed mail from their own domain,
>which is spam
>The envelope-sender is different (not their own domain), but all they
>can see is it is send from their own address.
DoNoSpoofing4From':Do NoSpoofing for from
-
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>The has a strict SPF-record, but it isn't checked
>because ASSP checks only the SPF of the envelope sender (which
>softfails, btw).
DoSPFinHeader will do SPF-checking additionally in From: header.
-
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Is there a way to validate users, say , with a password for smtp on
>assp ?
>
>E.g. when a user sends a mail to assp , should have to enter a
>password
>before the e-mail is sent to the outside ?
There is new experimental feature in 1.99(13156)
- AUTH Lo
Spyros Tsiolis schreibt:
>You said something about v1.99 being able to monitor who is sending
>what to the outside ?
ASSP:GUI
Control Outgoing:AUTHLogUser
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic
Spyros Mailinglists schreibt:
>I am thinking of grabbing imap/pop3/smtp account
>backups and installing from scratch on a CentOS 6.4
>
>
>Would you like to advise ?
I updated some hours ago from 1.99(13142) to 1.99(13143)
It was 1.98 several monthes ago
We developed "AutoUpdate" for a reason.
>> address since ASSP will then send infos about senders tripping over the
>> rate limiter to such an address; next, edit "lib\CorrectASSPcfg.pm" and
>> add it (or uncomment) the following
>>
>> $main::AUTHLogUser = 1;
This is valid for V2 only.
In V1 it is simple to activate the checkbox befo
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>>>Y) RTFM news about changed parameters, if need -- change it
We are talking here about autoupdate from from V1 1.75 to v1 1.99.
It is not like V1 to V2.
If there are new options, they have a reasonable default.
Big changes are listed in changelog.txt
--
Spyros Mailinglists schreibt:
>
>I am willing to do this , however I suspect trickery and anxiety
>when it will come to the perl modules.
There are no new modules necessary from 1.75 to 1.99.
--
Try New Relic Now & We
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>0) Stop ASSP service/daemon
>1) Do backup assp.cfg ( best -- all assp folders)
>2a) Copy aspp.cfg to aspp.cfg-0
>2) Rename aspp.pl to assp.pl-0
>3) Upgrade assp.pl ( and *.pl from plugins and lib )
>4) Start ASSP service/daemon
>X) Look on "diff -u aspp.cfg
Spyros Mailinglists schreibt:
>Can I do something to remedy this ?
You have to find the intruder.
Look into the header of such a mail: you will see many Received headers. It
goes multiple times through your servers.
Spyros Mailinglists schreibt:
>Should I scrap the existing assp installation and start from scratch ?
May be you should update to 1.99 ?
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>
>which matching pattern for ip adresses or ranges can I use for
>noMsgID and noSpoofingCheckIP?
>User interface says "For example:145.145.145.145|145.146."
The GUI says:
IP ranges are defined as for example '182.82.10.'. CIDR notation is
accepted (1
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>"X-Assp-Spam-Level: " line. What is happening here, and why?
"Add Graphical Level Header" is checked.
Bayesian Check is set to "scoring"
--
AlienVault Unified Security Ma
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>not exactly, ASSP will deal with the "received" headers and ...
No. You do not understand the feature.
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases"
Never happened, an appliance which receive mails and forward it to
any server (including ASSP) should add a receive header.
If not, there will be no entry in ISPHostnames or the entry will never
match. At least the IP of the appliance is put in ispip and ASSP will
handle the mails coming from it a
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Suppose someone from 31.11.43.121 tries to send to you an email
>pretending to be "mail.example.com" and using "example.com" as the
>sending domain (in email); ASSP sits behind the "proxy" so it only
>sees the proxy IP (say 10.0.0.1) now, HOW can ASSP check
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>you'd loose the real sender IP, that is, the one which
>*is* sending you the message,
Why?
--
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% vis
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I wonder if there some easy way to tell ASSP it is behind a firewall
>or do I just have to disable the checks,
>that are not working because of circumstances?
ASSP can use those checks, even if there is only one IP if front of
all senders.
- put the fro
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I wonder if there some easy way to tell ASSP it is behind a firewall
>or do I just have to disable the checks,
>that are not working because of circumstances?
Put the NAT firewall internal IP into -> Relaying->ispip
--
The njabl.org DNSBL is in the process of shutting down. On March 1,
2013,
the various njabl.org DNSBL zones were all emptied. Any systems
configured to use any of the NJABL DNSBL zones should be reconfigured
immediately to no longer use the NJABL DNSBL zones.
Today, April 29, 2013, NS for the
Please show the headers
--
Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete
for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam.
$5K
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>MessageScoring is already set to Blocking .
I wrote "MessageScoringLocal" !
--
Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I am intentionally sending from server messages with a spam message ,
>however ASSP is not blocking it , even if scoring is 500 .
set it to "blocking", scoring will block it if you check
"MessageScoringLocal"
Reduce the number of workers to 15 or so.
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>'d like that! Being able to exclude 192.168.0.0/16 would be nice.
SSL Proxy and TLS support -> noTLSIP
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with A
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>No I don't, but have noticed it when receiving spam that wasn't
>addressed to me. I usually look for the intended-for in the headers
>and the last few times, they weren't there.
Are the recipients local?
--
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>2) The option to exclude certain IPs from being added to the
>cache altogether.
>
>If either of these exist and I have missed them then please let me
>know where they are.
The description of noTLSIP is in "SSL Proxy and TLS support"
-
rne...@ringofsaturn.com schreibt:
>
>
>Should I add att.com or att-mail.com or
>amcustomercare.att-mail.com to the whiteSenderBase? ATT.com doesn't seem
>related to the below email address is why I ask.
whiteSenderBase is using the sending IP to check organization/domain for
whitelisted entries.
Remove ica...@amcustomercare.att-mail.com from whitelist
Add att.com to whiteorg.txt (whiteSenderBase)
--
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>s this possible? If so can someone point me in the right direction?
see ->wildcardUser
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Do
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I confirmed this said user is the first email address listed in
>"noprocessing" (though the list is not in a "file" it's just in the
>line provided). I did just now set a file for noprocessing, one line
>per address in the assp/files directory. I will see i
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Perhaps I assumed he was and thought that just being in noprocessing
>was sufficient and complete
Being in "noProcessing" is sufficient if there are no "NP"options.
I am very much in doubt that the user is correctly set in
"noProcessing"
because bombreNP
Are you sure, that u...@redacted.com is in spamLovers ?
Is bombReNP set?
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/a
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I have a questions about noprocessing. Our CEO wants all mail, no
>filtering at all. I have him on noprocesing and spamlovers list but
>he still receives a block report daily with mails being blocked.
Please show the type of blocking ( x-assp-headers and
I plan to drop support for Global Penalty Box in V1 on April 1th. V1 users who
want to use the Global Penalty Box must upgrade to
V2.
Fritz
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppD
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>
>Does anyone on the list have an assp LDAP set up relevant to Mac OS X
>Server Open Directory? Thanks.
http://macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2004/05/25/ldap.html
man dscl
--
Fre
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>Here's one of the configurations I've tried:
- enable DoLDAP
- use your settings from V1 if DoLDAP was enabled in V1.
--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>WhitelistLocalFromOnly is checked,
Are the mails going through assp "local" mails? Are the local domains
known to assp? If not uncheck WhitelistLocalFromOnly;
--
Master Visual
I do not understand your config, please send me an old working
assp.config
fb at iworld.de
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>I used this config with 127.0.0.x already the last two years with
>version 1.x.
>Why should I change this now?
In V1 127.0.0.2 will not work. Because 127.0.0.1-127.0.0.8 are all the
same address.
RFC 3330 - Special-Use IPv4 Addresses
127.0.0.0/8 - This b
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Adding private ip addresses makes the firewall concept obsolete.
Adding one private address makes your firewall obsolete? Ok, then I am
out.
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint,
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Adding private ip addresses makes the firewall concept obsolete.
Why that?
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>listenPort=publicIP:25
>smtpDestination=127.0.01:1025
>relayHost=127.0.0.1:125
>relayPort=127.0.0.2:25
>localDomains=ourLocalDomain
Please use:
listenPort=publicIP:25
smtpDestination=privateIP:1025
relayHost=privateIP:125
relayPort=privateIP:25
Do not use
AutoUpdate broken in some older versions
It is strongly recommended to download manually the newest version at:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/assp/ASSP%20Installation/AutoUpdate/ASSP1x/assp.pl.gz
(stable)
or
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/assp/ASSP%20Installation/AutoUpdate/
Since January 2013 the versionnumber has changed, there are 8 digits as before
but the separation is different.
The latest devel is 1.99(13013)
The latest stable is 1.98(13013)
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL,
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>Jan-13-13 18:46:39 [init] Couldn't create server socket on port
>'127.0.0.2:25'
As I wrote already, if you set listenPort toPort only like here to 25,
you can not set any IP with this port on this machine.
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>When I have only the port 25 in there, I get the right routing:
If you have 25 only in listenPort, it will cover all interfaces with
port 25: it will receive all connections to port 25 regardless of IP.
---
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>It is similar to Exchangedefender. I've got it set in ispip now. It
>seems to be working well so far. However, I don't know that it's
>caught
>any spam yet. I'm trying to clear out my ccspam mailbox so I can get
>a
>good idea of what's going on.
Are
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>
>Let me clarify once more.
Please read the GUI, the clarification is there:
ISP/Secondary MX Servers* (ispip)
Enter any addresses or hostnames that are your ISP or backup MX
servers, separated by pipes (|).
These addresses will (necessarily) bypass G
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>So, if I understand correctly, I need to put the 3rd party's IP info
>into ISPIP? But I also need to put the IP info into ISPHostNames if I
>want SPF checking to happen (because otherwise, it says by using ISPIP
>SPF checking won't happen)? Did I understa
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
> I'm wondering which settings I can change in ASSP
>to allow me to keep using it as an extra layer of defense. Or, is it
>best that I drop ASSP all together?
The server of the ISP should be put into your ispip.
--
Spyros Tsiolis schreibt:
>
>I tried to re-send a file from assp and the browser comes back with a
>"retry later" message (google chrome).
What URL does ASSP try to acces?
--
Master SQL Server Development, Administratio
Sorry, but I cannot reproduce the bug. This will work for outgoing
mails.
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with
1 - 100 of 2236 matches
Mail list logo
