Re: [Assp-test] changes in assp 2.0.2_1.2.26

2010-10-10 Thread Mark Edwards
Sorry if this is elementary, but how do I update to this version? I checked http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/ and the latest version is 2.0.2._1.2.21. I clicked the Development link on http://assp.sourceforge.net/, and it was not obvious how to follow the latest version. I also see t

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Incorrect addresses added to whitelist via the email interface

2010-10-08 Thread Mark Edwards
On Oct 2, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Looks better. > > 1. if you meen a "local address", assp consider it has a 'local domain' , > which has to be defined in assp - any domain that is not defined as local > domain (flat file or LDAP) is not considered local > 2. set up 'NoAutoWh

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Proper shutdown from command line

2010-10-08 Thread Mark Edwards
On Oct 8, 2010, at 5:41 AM, "Zrin Ziborski" wrote: > Am 07.10.2010 15:53, schrieb Thomas Eckardt: >> Hi Zrin, >> >>> (see an example @ http://blog.ziborski.net/e-mail/upstart-assp/) >> realy nice scripts - is there any chance to share them for public on >> sourceforge ? >> > > sure, no proble

[Assp-test] Proper shutdown from command line

2010-10-06 Thread Mark Edwards
The init.d script that I installed as part of my ASSP 2.0.1(1.1.28) configuration contains the following command for stopping assp.pl: kill -9 `ps ax | grep "perl assp.pl" | grep -v grep | awk '{ print $1 }'` kill -9 seems like a nuclear method. Is there a good way to gracefully shut down ASSP

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Incorrect addresses added to whitelist via the email interface

2010-10-04 Thread Mark Edwards
On Oct 4, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: >> Just to be clear, which headers should be candidates for whitelisting? > Only "From:"? "From:" and "Reply-to:"? > > Is there anything unclear after reading the GUI? > > ..Normal operation includes addresses in the FROM, SENDER, REPLY-TO, >

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Incorrect addresses added to whitelist via the email interface

2010-10-04 Thread Mark Edwards
On Oct 2, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Looks better. > > 1. if you meen a "local address", assp consider it has a 'local domain' , > which has to be defined in assp - any domain that is not defined as local > domain (flat file or LDAP) is not considered local > 2. set up 'NoAutoWh

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Incorrect addresses added to whitelist via the email interface

2010-10-01 Thread Mark Edwards
On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > IMHO is this not a correct MIME message: > >> From: Trustwave mailto:em...@communications.trustwave.com>> >> To: IT_AV mailto:it...@thecjm.org>> > > both lines are not correct > >> Message-ID: <380dc3a4-58c9-4e10-bdb1-965395b82...@xtinmta12.x

Re: [Assp-test] Incorrect addresses added to whitelist via the email interface

2010-10-01 Thread Mark Edwards
It seems as if this issue is not being recognized. Am I incorrect that there are one or more bugs here? On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Mark Edwards wrote: > I see what I think are problems with the way whitelisting occurs when using > the asspnotspam function of the email interface. T

Re: [Assp-test] Incorrect addresses added to whitelist via the email interface

2010-09-27 Thread Mark Edwards
On Sep 27, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ASSP development mailing list > schreibt: >> My concern here is having irrelevant addresses cluttering the >> whitelist. > > > Disable EmailErrorsModifyWhite. Will that not make it so that no addresses are added to the whitelist? I want

[Assp-test] Incorrect addresses added to whitelist via the email interface

2010-09-27 Thread Mark Edwards
I see what I think are problems with the way whitelisting occurs when using the asspnotspam function of the email interface. This is on 2.0.1(1.1.28). In the example below, I would expect only em...@communications.trustwave.com to be added to the whit