tachement blocking look inside archives?
> How can i block this kind of exploit?
>
> I scanned the .exe with clamscan but it detected no virus otherwise clam
> would have blocked the attachment.
Use the Sanesecurity signatures - specifically the Foxhole ones which can block
exec
what about taking it out of your white listed domains and find the ip
range of the efax mailservers from
http://www.senderbase.org/senderbase_queries/detaildomain?search_string=efax.com
and put those ranges in your ipnp.txt then try other things to block
the spoofing mails like regex etc, but t
ot working correct).
> If you have a service contract for MySQL - open a support ticket.
>
> Or post your system (OS) configuration - possibly there is anyone in the
> list who could tell you the right MySQL version to use.
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> Von:Paul Ho
, "SELECT COUNT(*) from spamdb" returns 0. The database is
working, there are plenty of records for whitelist for instance.
On 8/2/2012 9:08 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I need to know:
>
> - was the import not OK
> Aug-02-12 08:46:58 [init] Successfully add
n 8/1/2012 9:27 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Paul,
>
> is the MySQL table 'spamdb' empty or not (use the MySQL admin or similar
> for this check) after a rebuild (don't restart assp at this time).
>
> Analyze one corpus spam email in the GUI after that rebuild - is the
[init] Using table in mysql
Database instead of file c:/assp/ldaplist
Aug-02-12 08:46:58 [init] Warning: Bayesian spam database has only 0 records
On 8/1/2012 9:32 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Paul,
>
> set 'DataBaseDebug' to ON - do it again.
>
> is there a messa
table in mysql
Database instead of file c:/assp/ldaplist
Aug-01-12 09:17:58 [init] Warning: Bayesian spam database has only 0 records
On 7/31/2012 9:55 AM, Paul Houlbrooke wrote:
> From the attached config, can anyone tell why I'm getting the following
>
> Jul-30-12 10:2
- this should never happen ?
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> Von:Paul Houlbrooke
> An: ASSP development mailing list ,
> Datum: 31.07.2012 16:09
> Betreff:[Assp-test] Bayesian database empty
>
>
>
> From the attached config, can anyone tell why I
From the attached config, can anyone tell why I'm getting the following
Jul-30-12 10:28:53 [init] Warning: Bayesian spam database has only 0 records
I must have changed something at some point to mess this up, but I can't
figure out what. Rebuildrun still shows spam/ham.
Jul-30-12 09:11:14
Paul
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint sec
t fix my reporting confirmation message or something. I
haven't changed any thing except for taking 2.2.1 recently.
Thanks
Paul
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways tod
Sorry, what I should have said was I changed the owner on the file and
away it went (for now I guess)
The files in lib are -rw-r--r-- to nobody and group nobody
The lib directory is drwxr-sr-x to nobody and group nobody
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:38:08 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote
as it couldn't run as nobody. Not a big problem as I just changed
the permissions but not sure if this is a feature or stupid user setup
on the directory structure. Looking at the directories though the lib
and ASSP root directory are all owned by nobody.
Thought I would note it.
Cheers
Have you tried the mail analyzer provided by ASSP, it might give you a
clue as to why it is accepting it?
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:30:53 -0400, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
> I'm still trying to get settings right (and I think I'm close), but
> ASSP is failing to catch really obviously faked domains!
>
>
Four new UTF-8 rfcs have been published:
RFC 6530 on Overview and Framework for Internationalized Email
RFC 6531 on SMTP Extension for Internationalized Email
RFC 6532 on Internationalized Email Headers
RFC 6533 on Internationalized Delivery Status and Disposition
Notifications
See http://tools.
Hi
When I forward the attached email header to EmailBlackAdd I get the To
address added to the blacklistdomain rather than sender (From) address.
This has worked in the past but doesn't appear to work for this
particular email any ideas?
I am running ASSP 2.1.1(11364)
Thanks
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7450#mpart3
Magic - and still doing a great job!
paul
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft develop
Changed so that it works as your recommendation.
Cheers
Paul
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:54:39 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>report to an address
>
> use EmailVirusReportsTo
>
>>and the recipient
>
> use the ASSP_AFC plugin to send the orig. desinfected mail to
Sorry Thomas that is what I meant the email reports. Is it possible to
have the email report sent to an address and the recipient?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:33:08 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>copy of the email or not?
>
> ASSP will never send an infected mail for secu
Actually when I say virus emails, I actually mean virus email reports.
That is one way Doug, thanks.
Paul
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:22:47 -0500, Doug Lytle wrote:
> Paul Farrow wrote:
>> so I can keep an eye on whats coming in.
>
>
> As an alternative, I have mine setup to q
virus emails as well as
the recipient, so I can keep an eye on whats coming in.
Thanks
Paul
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
ip in Kuwait) still connected or is it
stuck?
Any ideas ? Do I need to limit connection time etc and if so how do I
do that?
Thanks in advance.
Paul
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't
disco. Had openssl installed but had some of the OpenSSL perl modules
missing. Installed them via CPAN and now its working.
Thanks again Thomas
Paul
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:40:24 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Install OpenSSL
> Install the Perl modules
>
> Crypt::CBC
> Cry
I saw that also Doug but didn't think it was my problem.
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:35:17 -0500, Doug Lytle wrote:
> Paul Farrow wrote:
>> Can't locate Crypt/OpenSSL/RSA.pm in @INC (@INC contains
>
> Google says:
>
> "This looks like a missing depend
ing a perl expert - how can I fix this please?
Paul
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:17:00 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> run
>
>>perl -e "use Mail::DKIM::Verifier;"
>>perl -e "use Mail::DKIM;"
>
> this should show you the reason
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
installed? I am running assp version ASSP
version 2.1.1(11355) on Fedora Core 16.
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:09:34 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>What does the plugin...
>
> Install it and read the GUI for the plugin.
>
> - scannes the complete mail not only maxBytes
&g
Ok thanks.
Paul
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:09:34 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>What does the plugin...
>
> Install it and read the GUI for the plugin.
>
> - scannes the complete mail not only maxBytes
> - delivers cleaned up mails if you want
> - scores mails because o
What does the plugin give you that the standard ASSP V2 and ClamAV give
you?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 09:33:46 +0300, Victor Miasnikov wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> How can I confirm that ASSP version 2 is using the ClamAV daemon.
>> I send in an email with an attachm
Ah thanks very much will deffo look at those.
Paul
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:49:09 -0500, Doug Lytle wrote:
> Paul Farrow wrote:
>> nteresting, currently ASSP and ClamAV has detected one viral email
>
>
> You may want to look into the SaneSecurity signatures for ClamAV.
>
Interesting, currently ASSP and ClamAV has detected one viral email
from GFI, the rest of the mails are currently being delayed. Is so nice
to see software just work.
Thanks to Thomas and the rest of the ASSP gang that made it so great.
Paul
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:45:23 -0400, Tim Jacob
pleased I have that working now.
Cheers
Paul
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:09:39 -0500, Doug Lytle wrote:
> Paul Farrow wrote:
>> I guess I must have something wrong as I don't have that line in the
>> log file.
>
>
> Under my /etc/clamav/clamd.conf:
>
> LocalSocke
the clamd scanner to store that file also.
I reckon I haven't got the scanner working correctly, will play with
the configuration file now I know I should see a scanned log line as you
have shown Doug.
Thanks
Paul
I have set the useClamAV
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:39:46 -0500, Doug Lytl
in an email with an attachment I don't see any logging that its
scanning the file. I looked in the clamav logfile and I don't see
anything in there except successfully running messages.
What should I see / how can I confirm that its scanning the
attachments?
Thanks in adva
Merry Christmas to you as well Thomas.
Thank you for all the work and have a good 2012!
paul
On 24 Dec 2011 at 8:33, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> fixed in assp 2.1.2 build 11358:
>
> - It was possible that assp has removed some bytes from the original mail
> heade
sent directly to you.
Thanks
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:13:41 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Paul, please could you repost the report text in an attachment (zip
> if
> possible) - SF and mail clients are breaking lines. So I'm unable to
> see
> what you mean.
>
> Thomas
&
Sure I can do that. I guess that's a trait of the very old version 1
ASSP that I came from originally.
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:10:23 +0100, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Try to set webAdminPort to 5. ( remove |2|3|4)
>
>
>
> ---
.com
for fedo...@farrowcomputing.com
It can make it quite hard to look to see which mails I need to get back
or not.
Thanks in advance.
Paul
--
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper is int
I should have worded my question better. What I was after was the non
production builds so that I could get the removeForeignBCC to work.
Thanks for replying though
Paul
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 09:53:31 +0100, Matti Haack wrote:
> Just download it from Sourceforge:
>
Thank you. I appreciate it.
Paul
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:01:11 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>I have looked at the GUI can't see it
>
> 'Info and Stats' -> 'Server Information' -> ASSP version -> release +
> beta
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
Apologies but how do I get ASSP to subscribe to the assp-test builds.
I have looked at the GUI can't see it and looked in the ASSP cfg and
cant see anything that might be relevant either.
Thanks again
Paul
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 06:09:02 +0100, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>ASSP 2.1.1(1
Hi Thomas/Guys
Sometime ago you told me that the removeForeignBCC on the command line
was put into a later version than that of what I was running at the
time. I have just upgraded to ASSP 2.1.1(11278) and I am still eeing
these warnings. Is it a problem of ASSP or just how I have called (th
On 10 Nov 2011 at 11:49, GrayHat wrote:
>
> > That one still requires srvany, NTwrapper or similar to work as a
> > service.
>
> Right, not a big issue btw, but having native support eases things :)
>
> I just wonder what happened to "tBB" time ago he was active on
> some lists/forums, but no
ial' version at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clamav/files/clamav/win32/
That one still requires srvany, NTwrapper or similar to work as a service.
paul
--
RSA(R) Conf
scan.
However, one of the Clamwin team releases his own complete port at
http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/ which is now up to 0.97.3 and has 32- and 64- bit
versions.
paul
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Reg
AH woops, not got the correct version *embarrassed face* will download
later versions.
Sorry and thanks
Paul
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:22:36 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> the error message should be:
>
> "relay attempt blocked for non local BCC
> re
0 Byte
what am I doing wrong?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:21:16 -0400, Paul Farrow wrote:
> Ah so I cant get the original message back for that one?
>
> No big deal, I did it the old school way and wrote the order number
> down any way :)
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
55 or what ever is
> needed
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:Paul Farrow
> An: ASSP development mailing list
>
> Datum: 20.10.2011 16:54
> Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: general question about
> dnsbl
>
>
>
>
>
> I put the i
I put the ip in noRBL although they are dynamic addresses so likely to
have a whole bunch eventually in there.
Will see how it goes.
Thanks again
Paul
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:33:54 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> All routing IP's are checked like regular IP's.
>
> In bloc
is wrong. Does
one simply try to contact comcast? Horror that would be.
Interested to know others strategies on this kind of email problem
Thanks
Paul
--
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and
Ah so I cant get the original message back for that one?
No big deal, I did it the old school way and wrote the order number
down any way :)
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:17:43 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> BCC is part of the header -> header check (BCC) -> message was
Got that going but when I wanted to get the email back I noticed the
mail had gone in the discarded folder and it doesn't appear to have a
message body. Is this because of the checking or is it likely that
Epson didn't send me a body to my order confirmation?
Thanks
Paul
On T
Ok I understand. Probably just want it in the code rather than
configurable.
Thank you
Paul
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:51:33 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>Any plans to make this a regular configuration item?
>
> Possibly yes - depends on: if this feature will remain in the code or
Super. Any plans to make this a regular configuration item?
Apologies if this has been discussed before.
Paul
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:15:32 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> For example
>
> /usr/local/bin/perl /opt/assp/assp.pl /opt/assp
> --removeForeignBCC:=1
>
> or shor
Can I be a dummy today as well? If you want to do it with a startup
switch how do you do that ?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:28:19 +, Steve Moffat wrote:
> Sorry for being a bit of a dummy, I have downloaded CorrectASSPcfg.pm
> and put it in the lib dir.
> How do I o
) (192.168.240.18)
by 0 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2011 20:21:41 -
From: epsonstoreord...@ea.epson.com
To: x...@thefabfarrows.com
Subject: Epson Order Confirmation
bcc: earch...@ea.epson.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/a
thanks
Paul
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:45:55 +0200, Anders Westin
Thanks Anders.
That is what I am seeing. Is there a way to stop it marking it as a
"relayattempt"? I probably wouldn't care but as this is a high profile
blue chip (EPSON printers) sending a BCC its probably the first of many
that I am likely to receive.
Any ideas?
Thank
BCC not local check for all?
Thanks
Paul
--
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning
I hear ya.
Thanks again for a great product.
Paul
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 23:01:06 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>its a free world
>
> Yes - do what you want.
>
> BUT
>
>>but sometimes I just want to
>>change a file.
>
> There are some major things, that cou
and it has
improved greatly since ASSP first started but sometimes I just want to
change a file.
Personal preference - its a free world, although from what I have seen
on the version 1 group I am in a minority :(
Thanks
Paul
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:15:14 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASS
Oh yes that's the trick, if I use the directory before the * it works.
Thanks Todd.
Cheers
Paul
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:47:32 -0400, Todd Goodman wrote:
> Can't you grep the directory without quoting all the filenames with:
>
> grep whatever -- dir/*
>
> ?
>
> Tod
I guess I am just old school, like to do things on the command line :)
Thanks again
Paul
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 20:26:14 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>look to see if something has been
> blocked in Version 2
>
> MaillogTail I think
>
> I don't find any reason to access
ah shame. Whats the desired way to look to see if something has been
blocked in Version 2? The block reports I guess.
Was there a reason it was changed from underbar to hyphens when
switching to Version 2?
Thanks
Paul
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 20:10:00 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>I
notspam looking for email content without having to escape all the file
names.
Thanks
Paul
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application
I didn't realise that. Learn something everyday. Changed my firewall,
clients and config to adhere to to that.
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 06:51:05 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-10-03 11:20 PM, Paul Farrow wrote:
>> If I telnet'd to port 25 it would immedia
right from the beginning and the ssl timeout problem
was really bugging me so will be interested to see how Version 2 works
in the coming months.
Great job guys.
Thank you
Paul
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:07:37 +1030, Peter W Bowey wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> ASSP 2.0.2_3.3.01
>
> Not so ha
looks like by putting 465 in the listenportssl it
has sorted the problem.
Any ideas / try to explain to me what I was doing wrong.
Thanks again for your help
Paul
ps: it might also be good if you can explain where or how I can
download your dev updates. :)
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:42:32 +0200, T
the early talker message happens before it does any
other logging etc etc.
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:42:32 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> ASSP acts transparent in the greeting - what you see comes from your
> MTA.
>
> Paul download and tr
Ah I think that perhaps that is the trick that its likely my patched
QMAIL rather than Thunderbird.
I will download the new version tonight as I am currently at work and
let you know.
Thanks again for quick replies.
Paul
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:42:32 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> ASSP a
ng of the problem or that it
isn't a problem with my setup if no one else is seeing this. I don't
want to feel a lemon in the face of the mighty Mozilla !!
Thanks again
Paul
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:14:19 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-10-03 8:08 AM, Paul Farrow wrote:
>&g
I take it other fokes can reproduce this problem I am seeing?
If you definately think its a problem with TB will you raise a ticket
with Mozilla? As I am kinda stuck with my TB clients using ASSP since I
have updated to version 2.
Thanks again
Paul
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:50:03 +0200, Thomas
appear to have this problem with ASSP Version
2 which is why I question is it something to do with my setup.
Thanks
Paul
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 18:51:03 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>that ASSP Version 2 has this issue
>
> This is not an ASSP issue - your client is doing bad SMTP.
&
Thunderbird
clients working again without having to switch off SSL?
Thanks for your quick reply and all you do for the ASSP project.
Paul
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:21:06 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Your client '10.1.10.149' is talking before the MTA has sent the '220
> ...'
&
d list
was 'n/a' - used 1 SocketCalls
I have QMail as the MTA behind ASSP if that is a clue and my android
phone authenticates over SSL/TLS no problem.
It all worked fine over ASSP Version 1 except for the known odd SSL
timeout error with attachments.
headers as an ip address? In that case it was
"(ecelerity
2.2.3.46 r())" and Thomas suggested:
> putting '2.2.3.46' in to 'noDelay' is the better way (not
> 'noBlockingIPs' and 'noRBL')!
paul
-
Thanks for the warning.
Already been noticed and fixed.
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 16:17 +0200, GrayHat wrote:
>
> > It look like this introduced a bug.
> [...]
> > I roled back to 2.0.2_1.1.22 and VRFY is working great again.
>
> Yup, noticed the same issue; a bit of warning; ensure to
> wipe your
t;yoda.up.ac.za
...
ASSP restarts at 3:00 every day and the VRFY for these domains stopped
working at 2010-08-03 03:00
We had AutoUpdateASSP:=2 in the config (changed it to 1 for now)
I roled back to 2.0.2_1.1.22 and VRFY is working great again.
Regards
Paul
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:37 +0200,
little, but maybe it
does deter some spam.
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 09:37 +0200, GrayHat wrote:
> > Is there a way to turn this off ?
>
> Paul... sounds like you're willing to delay legit MTAs
> I wonder why you're willing to do that even knowing
> it will NOT give y
Is there a way to turn this off ?
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:32 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> V2 is doing this for SPF - for SenderBase I'll implement this. But
> the
> complete SPF-Cache is somehow not working as expected - this will be
> improved.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
nd load balance across them with a load balancer (F5 BigIP
or even haproxy) ?
We can live with the response times as it is, but I am worried that it
might get worse as the mail load increase over time.
Regards
Paul
--
Th
this (once every minute).
The backend servers are fast enough (always 3ms response time ) and the
DNS is 0-1 ms response across 4 servers.
It is not using a lot of CPU. About 80% of 1 core. There are 8 cores
available. Might spike to 200% for very short bursts.
Are there any thing in particula
- please upgrade to a
> newer version (5.010001 [5.10.1]) if possible!
>
> Is any newer version (5.12.x) good ?
> What version do you use to develop on and what OS/distribution ?
>
>
> Regards
> Paul
>
>
>
> -
ny newer version (5.12.x) good ?
What version do you use to develop on and what OS/distribution ?
Regards
Paul
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO,
I'll stick with grep.
Thank you for taking the time to help and answer my questions.
Regards
Paul
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 10:58 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> >Is there a way to log only messages of this nature (warning/errors of
> >assp self - not the content it's handeli
x27;s handeling) to a seperate file.
Is this where the syslog facility comes in or will the same info as in
(logfile) just be repeated there ?
Regards
Paul
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 09:27 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> >Can this be a tcp setting ?
>
> No. The only reason could be, that your M
p.cfg
denySMTPstrictEarly:=
mail:...local/assp#grep -i talk assp.cfg
Regards
Paul
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 16:52 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list writes:
> >Misbehaved SMTP session
>
>
> You should disable this sett
t does not cause any problems, but the behaviour does not seem right.
Regards
Paul
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/
Thanks Thomas !
It is working great !
Regards
Paul
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 12:35 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> changed in 2.0.2_1.1.14
>
> - if a mail had a Bayes - lowconfidence, it has been passed, even if the
> messagescore was above the limit - this is cha
Thanks Thomas !
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 07:25 +0200, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> Paul,
>
> for now set 'baysConf' to 0 .
>
> This is a general logical mistake inside ASSP V2 - if the Bayes check has
> switched on the '[lowconfidence]' flag, there is no reason to
would have been able to block 1450 messages for today (until 18:00
South African time) instead of letting them pass as tagged spam.
Regards
Paul
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:07 +0200, Paul Schutte wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I see messages in the maillog.txt that look like this:
> 2010-06-29 1
using Western Union]
It seems like we could use a switch like:
"Block messages with Low confidence but High Score"
This is just a wish.
It is already doing a great job and thank you very much for that.
Regards
Paul
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 20:34 +0200, Paul Schutte wrote:
> Hello agai
ES (Probably)
X-Assp-Block: NO (testmode)
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Bayesian
X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 89
X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 1.0
X-Assp-Spam-Level: *
X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit
X-Assp-Envelope-From: n...@ccnet.up.ac.za
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore 89, limit 80
Regards
Paul
On Tue, 201
I've had continual issues with their servers as well. A month or so back I
stopped getting mail from -users completely and the mail from -test was
sparse. I removed and re-added my self to the lists and I started getting
mail as expected. * shrug *
> From: "Hill, Brett"
> Reply-To: ASSP dev
ement ritual is having a lobotomy.
> From: Charles Marcus
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:36:54 -0400
> To: ASSP development mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Further issues with v2
>
> On 2010-06-10 2:25 PM, Paul K. Dicks
Sounds like my old boss.
Me: "I have the exchange 2003 test server cluster up. I'm trying to test it
out. Does anyone want to have their mailbox moved there to help me out? I
put mine there a week ago and have not had any problems"
My boss: Sure!
1 week later...
Boss: "Why isn't webmail wor
switchTestToScoring is off
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 21:12 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
> >The easiest to explain this is that had I turned Bayesian off, the
> >score
> >would have been 110 and the message blocked.
> >Now with Bayesian on, the score is 129
I am running ASSP version 2.0.2(1.1.09)
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 21:12 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list
> schreibt:
> >The easiest to explain this is that had I turned Bayesian off, the
> >score
> >would have been 110 and the message blocked.
> >Now with Bayesian on, the
eat software even better.
Regards
Paul
X-Assp-Version: 2.0.2(1.1.09) on spamcontrol.up.ac.za
X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 5 (Suspicious HELO - contains IP:
'111-255-183-207.dynamic.hinet.net')
X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 25 (Blocked Country TW (CHTD, Chunghwa Telecom
Co., Ltd.))
X-Assp-Me
The way your OS identifies the perl binary process has nothing to do with
assp AFAIK.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: Hilario Fochi Silve
No cpu hogging? Weird. Perhaps a v1 vs v2 issue.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: Thomas Eckardt
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailin
I'm still not having any luck with it. It recognizes '' as spamlover and
the .*? Hammers the cpu to the point of bringing assp to its knees.
Thanks anyway :)
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick,
1 - 100 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
