[Assp-test] 1.5.1.5(0.0.04)

SSP/logs/maillog.txt Jul-1-09 00:04:32 Info: searching in logfile c:/ASSP/logs/maillog.txt Jul-1-09 00:04:36 Info: searching in logfile c:/ASSP/logs/maillog.txt ______ Steve Thompson Southwest Contract 17 Professional Drive Temple, Texas 76504 254.74

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.3.03) spam report not delivered correctly

I have been receiving reports just fine up until I installed 1.5.1.3(0.3.03) yesterday. This is what I received for today: The mail.swcontract.com SPAM filter found no blocked messages for 0 in the past 1 day(s). If you recognize any of these senders and wish to have them whitelisted

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: ClamAV - set scoring/rejectbased on virus database FP risk

> > . The character '~' has to be never used inside a weighted regular > > expression. The multiplication result of the weight and the > penaltybox > > valence value will be used for scoring, if the absolute value of > > weight is less or equal 6. Otherwise the value of weight is > used for >

[Assp-test] RBL Service Providers*

I just noticed there is only one asterisk on this. Does this mean it longer accepts weights? The default is weighted however. -- OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises looking to depl

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

> > Having looked through th ASSP logs, I tend to agree, I had > been running 1.5.1.3(0.1.12) for 2 days with no problems.Ran > (0.2.02)for a day no problems changed to (0.2.05) this > morning "ClamAV Down - ClamAVup" started within a hour. > > Peter I hope I am not speaking too soon, but

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

> > clamd runs normally; at a given point the extra-sigs update > script starts and download the signatures but, for a reason > or another one of the signature files is corrupted... and the > script doesn't notice that... and copies the new files to the > clamav data folder The only argument

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

> > that's why I suggested to set up things "plain vanilla" and > to also have a look at the clamd log; the latter may show > which signature file (if any) caused the crash and could help > fixing the issue (and it may also be useful to file a bug to > the signature mantainer) > Had "plain

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

> > are you using additional signatures (e.g. sanesecurity and so on) ? Yes > > If so, could you please try removing the additional > signatures from the ClamAV folder (and temporarily disabling > the additional signatures update script - if any) and then > restarting ClamD and re-enablin

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

> Just happened here as well > Phew! Thought I was the only one! Makes me feel better. -- OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

> > > > > > ClamD is eating up all the processor and then ASSP becomes > > unresponsive, my watchdog restarts ASSP because telnet to port 25 > > fails, and everything is fine until it happens again. > > > > > > Just happened again I have disabled ClamAV for now in ASSP and all is well.

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

> > ClamD is eating up all the processor and then ASSP becomes > unresponsive, my watchdog restarts ASSP because telnet to > port 25 fails, and everything is fine until it happens again. > > Just happened again --

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.3(0.2.04) ClamAV

Just noticed this today, but I am sure it has been happening over the past couple of days. I had noticed the server running slowly, but didn't pay too much attention to it because I was swamped with other work. I will monitor it a little more closely from now on. Jun-5-09 10:02:52 Connecte

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3 features

> > No offense to you, but why would you ask a foolish question like that? > Geez! > That's like asking Microsoft what the future of Windows will be. > Just asking cause the last response I got from Fritz was that he might not do the coding anymore and that others were going to take it over.

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3 features

> I am not sure. There are people here who want other > developers, may be I will agree. > Any news on the future of ASSP? -- Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of te

Re: [Assp-test] Clamav and other tests issues with test mode on SRSASSP 1.5.1

> > Please consider to support the project by a donation. > Priceless! -- Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals.

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.3?

> > Yes, there was a bug in the VRFY Feature. > But I am sure there are others. > Started 1.5.1.3 (.04) and all mail sent to local users gave a "unknown user" error Back to 1.5.1.2 and all is well -- Crystal Reports

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.3?

I this version just additional bug fixes in the 1.5.1.2 release? -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.3 features

Hey Fritz, What are your plans as far as new features in the new beta? -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks

Re: [Assp-test] SourceForge Community Choice Awards Nominations

> > http://sourceforge.net/community/cca09/nominate/?project_name= > Anti-Spam > SMTP Proxy Server&project_url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/ Nominated! A big thanks to all for the great work that has been done on this project. ---

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 (3.0.00) two recipient email, but only one received i

> > You mean, it listed two addresses in the "TO:" field. Correct > I believe the ASSP log. I believe it as well. I told the user I would investigate it, so I did. It is just hard to explain all the ins and outs when they clearly see their name listed in the TO: line.

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 (3.0.00) two recipient email, but only one received it

> > > > > >May-7-09 12:18:35 n...@mydomain.com matches name@ in > >LocalAddresses_Flat > > This is the only rcpt address ASSP got, and it is clearly logged so. > How do you know, that there was a second recipient in the envelope? > He just forwarded me the messaage that lists two recipients

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 (3.0.00) two recipient email, but only one received it

I just had a user ask me why a message was blocked. I looked into and found this in the log: May-7-09 12:18:35 Connected: 208.109.78.207:38052 -> 192.168.0.2:25 -> 192.168.0.2:125 May-7-09 12:18:35 n...@mydomain.com matches name@ in LocalAddresses_Flat May-7-09 12:18:36 id-16715-04540 208.109.

Re: [Assp-test] About the penaltybox cleanup

> > Set MaintenanceLogging to verbose. My mistake. I already have it set to verbose. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect w

Re: [Assp-test] About the penaltybox cleanup

> > > In the newest version I changed the way the "flush" is > handled completely. Please try it . My logging is set to standard. Do I need to change it to something else? Just wanted to make sure since errors were hidden in previous versions.

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(2.1.00) penalty traps

Do Heavy Used Invalid Addresses as PenaltyBox Trap Addresses (DoPenaltyMakeTraps) The description of this entry needs to be changed to match the selections that are available in the dropdown box

Re: [Assp-test] About the penaltybox cleanup

> > Please look into several of the cleanings. How is the number > of IPs developing? > It seems to be working now. I don't get the permission denied anymore and the number of IPs is increaseing on some entries and decreasing on others with each cleaning. -

Re: [Assp-test] About the penaltybox cleanup

> > Nope, bad design and wrong approach to solve a bug (not to > mention the idea of hiding it by setting up things so that > error messages will only appear if you set the loglevel to > debug - cool idea, sounds like the chinese govt stuff :P) I am running 1.5.1.2(2.0.05). I no longer have

[Assp-test] ClamAV timeouts

An update from the developer of the ClamAV version that I use. I did not experience any timeouts so I am still using his 0.95.1a, but wanted to throw this out there if anyone is still have issues with the new ClamAV version. Dear list members, ClamAV 0.95.1b is available for download. The only

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 misspelling

Automatic Restart after Exception (AutoRestart) If ASSP detects a main exception and it runs not as service or daemon, it will try to restart it self automaticly! automaticaly should be automatically ---

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.2.08) cleanup permission denied still present

May-1-09 19:27:25 Saving whitelist May-1-09 19:27:25 Saving redlist May-1-09 19:27:25 Cleaning up delaying databases ... May-1-09 19:27:25 Cleaning delaying database (triplets) finished; keys before=673, deleted=251 May-1-09 19:27:25 Cleaning delaying database (safelisted tuplets) finished; keys

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.2.05)

I am getting numerous of these errors when ASSP is trying to send me nofications: May-1-09 14:03:00 Resend - try to open: c:/ASSP/resendmail/n645202.eml May-1-09 14:03:00 Resend - process: c:/ASSP/resendmail/n645202.eml (first time) May-1-09 14:03:00 (re)send - c:/ASSP/resendmail/n645202.eml - F

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 (1.2.06) does not shutdown and restart

Log entry when shutdown/restart is initiated May-1-09 13:04:21 Saving redlist May-1-09 13:04:21 Saving delaying records May-1-09 13:04:21 Saving penalty records May-1-09 13:04:21 Saving cache records May-1-09 13:04:26 Saving whitelist May-1-09 13:04:26 Saving redlist May-1-09 13:04:26 Saving delay

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: About the penaltyboxcleanup

> > Could just be a coincidence, but that seemed to make it worse. > I am still getting these errors as well. If I go back to 1.5.1.1, the cleanup runs fine. -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.2.02) Notifications and Resends appear to be working correctly

I'll keep an eye on it. -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from in

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 serious resend issues

> > Please send me the "all kinds of errors" > This with 1.5.1.2: Apr-30-09 09:31:43 (re)send - c:/ASSP/resendmail/2319.eml - no SMTP destination found in config - skip file - From: i...@describegrav.com - To: st...@swcontract.com Apr-30-09 09:31:43 (re)send - c:/ASSP/resendmail/n118438.eml

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Something has gone very wrong, RC22+?

> > very bad idea on windows. Why a bad idea? I have used BareTail for years with no issues -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a f

Re: [Assp-test] resent email 1.5.1.2 1.2.0

> If I downgrade to an older 1.5.1 the email are resent > immediately Anyone has the same problem ? > Yep same thing here. -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 serious resend issues

I continued to have resend issues with 1.5.1.2 with all kinds of resend errors showing up in the log. I just reverted back to 1.5.1.1 and I received all resent requests that were initiated from 1.5.1.2. I even got the rebuildspam notification report when running 1.5.1.1 even though it was neve

Re: [Assp-test] About the penaltybox cleanup

> Stopped ASSP and deleted all files in "pb" that had a > problem, restarted ASSP. > I just did the same thing. All that is in my pb folder is a global folder. When do these files start showing back up? I also set a notification with "orderedtie" so I will be alerted if it happens again (ve

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.1.12) log file not rolling

Apr-30-09 00:01:30: Rolling log file -- archive saved as 'logs/09-04-29.maillog.txt' Apr-30-09 00:01:30 new log file -- old log file renamed to 'logs/09-04-29.maillog.txt' I have the log to roll every day. I have this entry in my maillog.txt, but there is no file for that day in the log folder

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.1.11) info notification error

> > > Set the Email Interface Reports Destination ( EmailReportDestination) Why would ASSP not use the main smtpdestination if the value for the EmailReportDestination is blank? -- Register Now & Save for Velocity,

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.1.11) info notification error

> ASSP tries to send the report to st...@swcontract.com via > , because it is configured to do so. And nobody > is listening. That is the error. > 127.0.0.1:425 is my relay host. Why is it sending out to the relay host when it is a local user? This is the same issue I had when I was requesti

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.1.11) info notification error

I enabled the Notification Email To (Notify) option and now I am seeing a bunch of this: Apr-29-09 14:27:03 Info: notification message queued to sent to st...@swcontract.com Apr-29-09 14:27:03 Error: unable to resend file c:/ASSP/resendmail/n315093.eml to 127

[Assp-test] New invalidhelo file

Why is this listed twice? ^[^\.]+\.?$ -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for exter

Re: [Assp-test] ClamAV Antivirus Native Win32 Port - 0.95.1

> Try 0.95.1a from here http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav/ See changelog: > I am using this one as well and have not had any issues -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licens

Re: [Assp-test] Quick general ASSP routing question

> Or would I be just as well off sending it directly from the > Mailserver to the Internet? > That is what I would do. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign op

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: backscatter detection bug

> http://assp.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/assp_stats > Only 951 hosts? I would have thought there would a whole lot more. -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - reg

Re: [Assp-test] ClamAV Antivirus Native Win32 Port - 0.95.1

> > Heh... the problem is that, apparently there's no 1.91 for > win32 at least not in the repos I'm using, btw if you know of > any other repo carrying that I'd be happy to test the 0.95.1 > in production, till then, I'll just give it a spin on a test system > I just did a manual install us

Re: [Assp-test] ClamAV Antivirus Native Win32 Port - 0.95.1

> Could someone please confirm that this new port works with > File::Scan::ClamAV 1.8 > I have File::Scan::ClamAV 1.91. This version http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav has been running for 30 minutes or so and no timeouts or lockups like I experienced before. ---

Re: [Assp-test] ClamAV Antivirus Native Win32 Port - 0.95.1

> > > http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav/ > > THANKS :) ! > > I use this one: http://hideout.ath.cx/clamav -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.0.07) "help" email interface bug?

> The poster actually CHANGED the default name of the help > account from "assphelp" to "help", so ...? > I will change it back to the default then. -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and a

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.0.07) "help" email interface bug?

> > externaldomain.com is the sanitized address. > Actually, I just sent a dummy email and used h...@externaldomain.com and I get a help report. I tried 2 other dummy email to help addresses, and I get a help report delivered to me. ---

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.0.07) "help" email interface bug?

> > > > I just tried it and got a bounce back. > > Doug externaldomain.com is the sanitized address. -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(1.0.07) "help" email interface bug?

I just sent an email to h...@externaldomain.com and ASSP sends me a "help" report? Log shows this: Apr-21-09 14:43:08 IP 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0) matches acceptAllMail Apr-21-09 14:43:08 Connected: 192.168.0.2:4341 -> 192.168.0.2:325 -> 127.0.0.1:425 Apr-21-09 14:43:08 id-42988-13213 192.168.0.2

Re: [Assp-test] Strict helo checking

> since many co-oped home computers just have names how about > adding fast test such as: > > if ( $_ !~ /\./ ) { reject } > So, I can just add $_ !~ /\./ To my helo check to block these? -- Stay on top of everythi

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2 vcard being stripped from mail?

I have an odd thing happening. When a remote user sends me a vcard from Outlook, the log looks like this: Apr-16-09 11:39:07 Connected: 173.74.157.80:2473 -> 192.168.0.2:225 -> 192.168.0.2:125 Apr-16-09 11:39:07 id-99947-07786 173.74.157.80 to: na...@mydomain.com Regex:Red 'Subject: FW' Apr

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: [SPAM] Re: ASSP V 2.0.1 RC 0.0.01 released

> The sanesecurity sigs work well for these... > Yes, they work VERY well -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements C

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(0.0.31) (bombCharSets) setting

I noticed the defaults no longer have charset= preceding the setting Just wondering if I need to remove it from my setting. I currently have: charset=(BIG5|CHINESEBIG|GB2312|KS_C_5601|KOI8-R|koi8-r|EUC-KR|ISO-2022-JP|ISO-2022-KR|ISO-2022-CN|CP1251|WINDOWS1250|WINDOWS1251|WINDOWS-1250|WINDOWS-1

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(0.0.16) resend problem

> > Do you have a before and after of the headers? I tried .16 > on one of my emails and it worked. Maybe it has something to > do with the formatting of the email (ie. Text vs. HTML)? > Nevermind. The resend was sent before upgrading to .16 Just tried it again and it works -

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.2(0.0.16) resend problem

work, trying others... ______ Steve Thompson Southwest Contract 17 Professional Drive Temple, Texas 76504 254.742.0061 254.742.0832 FAX st...@swcontract.com www.swcontract.com -- This SF.net email i

Re: [Assp-test] bombcharset working but...

> BUT there's not the oprion anymore under Regex Filters / Spambomb !!! > I found it here: Regular Expression to Identify Spam in Header Part* (bombHeaderRe) Part of DoBombHeaderRe: header will be checked against this Regex if DoBombHeaderRe is enabled. For example: BIG5|CHINESEBIG|GB2312|KS_

Re: [Assp-test] maillog tail issue in 1.5.1.2.0.0.06

> I had to shut down the browser to get out. Same thing here. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1(0.1.16) and bombheader

> > So it looks like something broke in the last few builds > Bombheader is working in 1.0.00 -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sou

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (1.14) shutdown/restart not working

When I use the web interface to restart ASSP, it just shuts down and does not restart. The countdown timer reaches zero and then I get the "This page cannot be displayed" from IE. I have to manually start the service on the server. Here is the log: Mar-31-09 08:30:09 Shutdown/restart process

[Assp-test] (no subject)

-- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> Aha. You are admin. Admins have to use a special format as > described in the GUI: CRAP! Sorry Fritz. You are correct. I was not using the special format. I have since deleted my address from the GUI so I will act like a normal user now instead of an admin.

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> > Enable Report logging (ReportLog) to verbose. > > It is now fixed in 1.12 -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/li

Re: [Assp-test] GUI Shutdown/Restart

> IIRC since Shutdown/Restart GUI page has changed, Proceed > button only shuts down but don't restart. I remember this has > already been reported by someone else too. FYI > I have noticed that my installation no longer starts on its own either. It just shuts down and then I have to manuall

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> Enable Report logging (ReportLog) to verbose. Here's all I get after setting to verbose Mar-30-09 13:24:02 IP 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0) matches acceptAllMail Mar-30-09 13:24:02 Connected: 192.168.0.2:1807 -> 192.168.0.2:325 -> 127.0.0.1:425 Mar-30-09 13:24:02 id-37442-08526 192.168.0.2 blocke

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> > what request are you sending? > asspbl...@nospam.com which should send me a report of what has been blocked on my email address for the default of 5 days, correct? -- _

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> Is your email-interface working? > Can you send a request to whitelist an address? Yes, all other aspects of the email interface are working. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list A

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> > what is not working? > Same thing as I explained last week. When I send a request for a report, ASSP does not process the request. ASSP wants to send the request to my SMTP relay Mar-30-09 09:54:24 IP 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0) matches acceptAllMail Mar-30-09 09:54:24 Connected: 192.168.0

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> > I'll second that. > Still not working in (0.1.10) -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (0.1.00) not starting

Global symbol "$spfpValencePB" requires explicit package name at C:\ASSP\assp.pl line 8756. BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at C:\ASSP\assp.pl line 15377. -- __

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> > How is QueueUserBlockReports set? Run instantly. Still not working as of .10 -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/l

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.08) Blocked messages being sent to recipient

Mar-27-09 09:46:57 Connected: 66.196.0.14:37286 -> 192.168.0.2:25 -> 192.168.0.2:125 Mar-27-09 09:46:57 id-65217-01987 66.196.0.14 <1-1202645-vvm.com?leet...@mx1.wholestead.com> IP 66.196.0.14 (66.196.0) matches ispip Mar-27-09 09:46:57 id-65217-01987 66.196.0.14 <1-1202645-vvm.com?leet...@mx1.

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (1.04) slow, timing out, and restarting

> > ASSP does not connect to ClamAV directly. It uses a module > File-Scan-ClamAV. > Please make sure, you install the newest module > The new module is not working either. Here is the latest from the guy I was working with: "Meanwhile I had a closer look and most probably the 1.9.1 version

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> > IMHO nothing will work if there is not an SMTP server after ASSP. Sorry, should have clarified. I have: Me -> mailserver (Kerio) -> ASSP -> SMPT relay (hmailserver) -> internet -- _

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

> > Uhmm... let me guess... you have things setup this way > > you -> mailserver -> ASSP > > Isn't it ? If that's the case then you're sending the > blockreport request to your mailserver which, in turn, sends > it to ASSP... > am I correct ? > Yes, you are correct. I had my fingers cross

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (.04) block report not being processed

I and all users are receiving the daily reports, but if I send a message to asspbl...@nospam.com the log shows this: Mar-26-09 11:05:17 192.168.0.2 <> authenticated Mar-26-09 11:05:17 id-83517-07402 192.168.0.2 blocked email report and I receive nothing back from ASSP like I used to. Not su

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (1.04) slow, timing out, and restarting

> Subject pretty much sums it up. > I figured it out. I upgraded to ClamAv .95 for windows and this was causing ASSP to lock up and restart itself. This occurred right after the SPF check. I have since gone back to .94.2 and all is well once again. I am assuming that this is a ClamAv is

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (1.04) slow, timing out, and restarting

Subject pretty much sums it up. Remote users are reporting that they are unable to send messages and my mailserver is timing out when trying to relay through ASSP. I am experiencing this locally as well. -- ___

[Assp-test] 1.5.1.1 (1.10) Green text in GUI

Using IE and all the explanation text is green starting at: Bonus for Message & IP scoring with SPF (PenaltyBox Section) and ending at 3=score - don't block outright, add score value in baysValencePB (Bayesian section) -

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1 (1.04) trap not working

> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rtfm > -- LMAO -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cros

[Assp-test] 1.5.1 (1.04) trap not working

Mar-23-09 17:15:09 Connected: 88.66.88.136:4935 -> 192.168.0.2:25 -> 192.168.0.2:125 Mar-23-09 17:15:10 id-46510-03028 88.66.88.136 MessageScore is now 10, after adding 10 (Suspicious HELO - contains IP: 'dslb-088-066-088-136.pools.arcor-ip.net') Mar-23-09 17:15:10 id-46510-03028 [InvalidAddres

Re: [Assp-test] --SOLVED 1.5.1 resend mail configuration problem?

> Has anyone had a chance to look at this yet? Am I > overlooking something simple? > DUH! Found the issue. Nothing ASSP related. My own dumb self! -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Build

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Some serious problems in 2.0.0

> > Uncheck the boxes. > IMHO ASSP does exactly what it says in the description of the boxex: > > But, do you not think that AcceptAllMail should have precendence over the check boxes since the mail is originating from my local IP address that is listed in AcceptAllMail? ---

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Some serious problems in 2.0.0

> >However, I have mail that SHOULD be relayed through ASSP, > coming FROM > >my server, that is being blocked with "relay attempt blocked for > >unknown local sender domain" because the "from" address is > not a local > >domain (it originated outside my server, and is being > redirected to

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1 resend mail configuration problem?

> > Apparently, I don't have something configured correctly with > my mail flow. When I click on the icon to get a blocked > message resent to me from the block report, the log shows this: > > > Mar-13-09 08:20:58 id-50458-12529 192.168.0.2 > blocked email report > Mar-13-09 08:20:58 st..

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1 Droplist

> > Same thing here. Prior to running the script, I used the GUI > to create/save the droplist.txt file. Ditto for me. -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 wit

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1 Droplist

> Please load the newest rebuildspamdb.pl 2.5.1 (1.02) > I get this now. Droplist download failed: Cannot create ./c:\ASSP/files/droplist.txt -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are

[Assp-test] 1.5.1 resend mail configuration problem?

Apparently, I don't have something configured correctly with my mail flow. When I click on the icon to get a blocked message resent to me from the block report, the log shows this: Mar-13-09 08:20:58 id-50458-12529 192.168.0.2 blocked email report Mar-13-09 08:20:58 st...@swcontract.com mat

Re: [Assp-test] 1.5.1 Droplist

> Droplist download disabled. Any ideas here? > Mine had it too. -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and eas

Re: [Assp-test] [spam found] and passing because messagescore(79) low

> Mar-11-09 19:38:52 [Worker_1] [MessageLimit][lowlimit] > 93.183.165.26 to: >drucke...@rauchenstein.ch [spam found] and > passing because messagescore(79) low [RE >Discount Message 115334] -> > c:\assp/discarded/96730.eml You 100% sure you have the h

Re: [Assp-test] Block report to exclude certain test failures?

> > And it was the default and in the example. Yeah, I see that now when I put my mouse over the setting, but the verbiage had: Put anything here to identify messages which should not be reported. For example: [Virus]|[BlackDomain] It didn't have the slashes in there, but the code has it. Ve

Re: [Assp-test] Block report to exclude certain test failures?

> > Did you try to put \[Virus\] into it ? > That works. Thanks again for the help. Guess I need to read up on the regex tutorials. :) -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are po

Re: [Assp-test] Block report to exclude certain test failures?

> >[Virus] > in RegEx means: if it contains V or i or r or us or s ))) That would be why my report was blank then because I had a few in there and it was grabbing a whole lot of letters. Thanks for the clarification. ---

Re: [Assp-test] Block report to exclude certain test failures?

> > I just tested 14.05 and it worked. Using 15.01 now. If I include brackets around the failures (eg [Virus]), I receive a blank report. If I just put Virus in the box without the brackets, I receive the report with Virus excluded. So, for now, I do not have any brackets around my entries

Re: [Assp-test] Block report to exclude certain test failures?

> I just tested 14.05 and it worked. > > 14.05 does not start for me. Back to 14.03 and starts fine. XP Pro box -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the big

Re: [Assp-test] Block report to exclude certain test failures?

> > Please try it. > > Thanks for adding this! I think others will find it very uselful. Unfortunatley, I receive a blank report if a value is entered in this box. If I clear the box, I get a report. I have tried it with the defaults and with just [VIRUS] and I receive a blank report

  1   2   3   >