, if it is the result of a tempfail or not that a recipient is not
valid - and the decision that a recipient is not valid, is done as last
resort.
Thomas
Von:Charles Marcus
An: ASSP development mailing list
Datum: 15.04.2010 23:12
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changes in
On 2010-04-15 4:36 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>> 'NoValidRecipient' is used in every case.
> ?? Why? You should *never* reject with a 5XX Invalid Recipient in a TEMP
> fail situation.
>
> This is a really bad decision.
> How ever - I never send a 5xx on a unknown recipient.
Maybe this is just a
How ever - I never send a 5xx on a unknown recipient.
Thomas
Von:Charles Marcus
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 15.04.2010 21:49
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changes in 2.0.2_1.0.10
On 2010-04-15 2:23 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> On 2010-04-15 4:19
Looking into this some more, I see a lot of valid messages rejected
with SpoofedSender errors, when the sender domain was not a local
domain. I suspect this is related to the ForgedHELO problem - both
are treating remote domains as local, and incorrectly rejecting valid
email as a result.
At 0
On 2010-04-15 2:23 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> On 2010-04-15 4:19 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>> - if VRFY or RCPT TO check is used and the MTA is not available -
>>> assp now uses 'LDAPFail' to decide if the adrress is valid or
>>> not.
>>>
>>> 'LDAPFail','LDAP/VRFY failures return
>>> false',20,
Oh, I should mention that .10 was the most stable version of ASSP I
have seen on my server in a long time. It stayed up for over 6 hours
before I shut it down to revert to .08. Of course, it was rejecting
most of the inbound mail during that time, but it didn't crash (regex
out of memory) once
I installed the two LIB files and installed .10 this morning. My
clients immediately started screaming, because almost all of the mail
people were sending them was bouncing.
I had a look at the logs, and to my horror, almost every connection
was being reported as a forged HELO, even though the
>Does this result in a TEMPfail (ie, 4XX), or permanent fail (ie 5XX)?
'NoValidRecipient' is used in every case.
Thomas
Von:Charles Marcus
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 15.04.2010 17:06
Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changes in 2.0.2_1.0.10
On
On 2010-04-15 4:19 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> - if VRFY or RCPT TO check is used and the MTA is not available - assp now
> uses 'LDAPFail' to decide if the adrress is valid or not.
>
> 'LDAPFail','LDAP/VRFY failures return
> false',20,\&checkbox,'','(.*)',undef,'If checked, when an error occurs
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.0.10:
- if noSPFRe is used an error 'Unmatched ( in regex; marked by <-- HERE
in m/( <-- HERE (?-xism:(?is:.))/ at assp.pl line 14653.
'
cause the thread (Worker) to die.
changed:
- if VRFY or RCPT TO check is used and the MTA is not available - assp now
uses '
10 matches
Mail list logo
