Doug Traylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Whitelisting has nothing to do with Internal->Internal or local->local mail,
> it is only for External->Internal mail. Communications between internal
> employees is different then business comunication from the world to us so
> the added non-spam generat
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Can't we already do this with one of the regexps? I know I did
>something
>similar with our previous anti-spam proxy.
you can, but you cannot *allow* some charactersets.
>I would prefer accept all except those i specifically choose to block.
Very helpful for making a default proposal in the webadmin.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel
If only this worked with ASSP!
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/WhatisFuzzyOcr
Don't know how well it works.
James.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
Does anyone use Sawmill or some other log parser with ASSP? I tried to d/l
a trial version of Sawmill, but can't get it to recognize ASSP (even though
it says it supports ASSP log format).
Anyone have any success with it, or any other?
Thanks,
Eric
127.0.0.0 / 8
-Original Message-
From: Pascal Dreissen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam
SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Help with ASSP on a Plesk server (non-VPS) hosting
multipl
>which charsets should be blocked:
>eg: GB2312|BIG5|EUC-KR|ISO-2022-CN
Can't we already do this with one of the regexps? I know I did something
similar with our previous anti-spam proxy.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
From: "Fritz Borgstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I need a proposal for defaults:
>
> which charsets should be blocked:
> eg: GB2312|BIG5|EUC-KR|ISO-2022-CN
>
>
> or
>
>
> which charsets should be allowed
> eg: ISO-8859-1|UTF-8
>
I would prefer accept all except those i specifically choose to
Curious, could this problem be because my secondary domains all share a
different IP address than my primary domain?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Woods
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 3:49 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for u
Steve,
In Plesk under server -> mail -> whitelist
What are the ip/subs you are using ?
Steve Woods schreef:
> I installed the scripts (very nice, by the way) and ASSP still thinks my
> secondary domains are not local. I added
> /usr/local/assp/data/settings/virtualdomains to "Virtual Domains Fi
I installed the scripts (very nice, by the way) and ASSP still thinks my
secondary domains are not local. I added
/usr/local/assp/data/settings/virtualdomains to "Virtual Domains File" and
changed my "Local Addresses" to /usr/local/assp/data/settings/emails.
Strangely, when I use the email file, m
Charles said: -
> I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those European dates are confusing
to us yanks...
Not half as confusing as those American dates are to the rest of us! The
"correct" solution is to use the format mmdd, with whichever separation
characters suit you. This makes sorting ea
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>> If I had to choose I would say 'Which charsets should be blocked'.
>> Rational being it is too easy to forget to add a charset but fairly
>> easy
>> to block some should you choose to do so.
>
>
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>>> ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
>> I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are
>> confusing
>> to us yanks...
>
> yes . but it does not look so nice, in case you did not get it:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>If I had to choose I would say 'Which charsets should be blocked'.
>Rational being it is too easy to forget to add a charset but fairly
>easy
>to block some should you choose to do so.
I see it different:
ISO-8859-1|ISO-885
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> Does somebody have a list of Character Sets ?
>
> I need a proposal for defaults:
>
> which charsets should be blocked:
> eg: GB2312|BIG5|EUC-KR|ISO-2022-CN
>
>
> or
>
>
> which charsets should be allowed
> eg: ISO-8859-1|UTF-8
>
>
Both? With a checkbox to switc
Pascal Dreissen wrote:
> Hi Steve and Others,
>
> I just finished creating a little guideline for Plesk and ASSP
>
> http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Plesk
>
> I put the scripts also there!
>
> If you need any help, please ask!
>
I cleaned up the page a bit and added a link to it on the downloads
> ki**es
>
> fritz
Fritz you old softie! And here all along I thought you were a harda**!
Or were you just flirting? ;o)
Doug
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
>Does somebody have a list of Character Sets ?
I need a proposal for defaults:
which charsets should be blocked:
eg: GB2312|BIG5|EUC-KR|ISO-2022-CN
or
which charsets should be allowed
eg: ISO-8859-1|UTF-8
-
Take Surv
Thanks Pascal! I cant wait to see if it solves my issue.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal
Dreissen
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:00 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-use
Hi Steve and Others,
I just finished creating a little guideline for Plesk and ASSP
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Plesk
I put the scripts also there!
If you need any help, please ask!
Steve Woods schreef:
> Can you post the scripts in wiki?
>
> Thanks...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [
> Hi,
>
> Can it be that something is wrong with the wiki, i am not getting any
> confirmation code send, due to this i cannot contribute to the wiki!
>
>
> Grtz!
I think when I first signed up for the wiki, it took a while to receive my
confirmation email. First, the wiki seemed to take a li
Oops,
Sorry .. used the wrong email address :(
Pascal Dreissen schreef:
> Hi,
>
> Can it be that something is wrong with the wiki, i am not getting any
> confirmation code send, due to this i cannot contribute to the wiki!
>
>
> Grtz!
>
> -
Hi,
Can it be that something is wrong with the wiki, i am not getting any
confirmation code send, due to this i cannot contribute to the wiki!
Grtz!
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.ne
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>>> ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
>> I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are
>> confusing
>> to us yanks...
>
> yes . but it does not look so nice, in case you did not get it:
Hi Steve,
I am doing right now, and send you the details.
> Can you post the scripts in wiki?
>
> Thanks...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal
> Dreissen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 12:59 PM
> To: Questions and Answers for
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>> ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
>
>I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are
>confusing
>to us yanks...
yes . but it does not look so nice, in case you did not get it:
>1.2.7
..
>1.2.2007.
--
Charles Marcus wrote:
>> example incoming mail with assp list (trendmicro log)
> <--snip-->
>> all outside smtp are using HELO not EHLO maybe it's not a problem ;)
>
> Since EHLO is the more recent flavor of the HELO command, and advertises
> additional features of the mail server:
>
> http://em
Can you post the scripts in wiki?
Thanks...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal
Dreissen
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 12:59 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Help with ASSP o
>Please do not be pi**ed.
>
>Amy
ki**es
fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brie
Hi Steve,
Maybe i can help you. I have exactly the same setup running with assp,
only running on RHEL3.
I wrote a couple of scripts to get all the email addresses (including
mailman lists etc.. ) to a flat file (which works perfect with
validating receivers and senders) and the domains out of y
Amy Stinson wrote:
> On 23 Jan 2007 at 17:12, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>
>>> Does ASSP utilize callbacks to do sender verification?
>> I should be p... that you think I would implement such a feature
>> ))).
>>
>> No, we do not. And we will not, at least as long as I doing the
>> work )).
>>
>> fr
On 1/23/2007 Fritz Borgstedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
I'm guessing this is February 1st? ;) Those european dates are confusing
to us yanks...
This is great! ASSP has come o far in the last few months...
THANK YOU FRITZ !
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
On 23 Jan 2007 at 17:12, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> >Does ASSP utilize callbacks to do sender verification?
>
> I should be p... that you think I would implement such a feature ))).
>
> No, we do not. And we will not, at least as long as I doing the work
> )).
>
> fritz
I didn't think it at all.
ETA of 1.2.7 is now 1.2.2007.
There is only one report with an unresolved problem. This user has
everything in testmode and does not block anything with sender
validation but rather scores only. He sees a lot of sessions left open
in ASSP. Is there asimilar behaviour at somebody, I cannot produce
> Maybe it doesn't work at all (including up to 1.2.7.1 (68). I have never
> actually had a hit on this function, but I may just have been lucky.
The check in its current form secures against
http://www.pc-help.org/obscure.htm
types of obfuscation.
> Some of the examples in this test are just
--On Tuesday, January 23, 2007 18:16:07 +0100 Marrco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| iso-8859-1
That character set covers all of western Europe, and actually works as a
character set on Linux vs the politically correct damnable UTF-8
--
Andrew Macpherson,
OA5.com Ltd. Registered No.3952726 VAT
ASSP v1.2.6()
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:03 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Help with ASSP on a Plesk server (non-VPS) hosting
multiple domai
what ver
what version are you running?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and ear
I have ASSP installed on a RH C5 server (non-VPS) in /usr/local/bin. The
server runs Plesk 8.1 and hosts multiple domains. I have added all of the
domains to "Local Domains" under Relaying. The primary domain is the only
domain that ASSP seems to think is local. I can send whitelist additions,
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Hi,
>
>It is not meant to be all-inclusive.
Ok, I asked for a list, because I am thinking about a feature, where
you can define in ASSP what charactersets you ALLOW.
fritz
-
>
>See attached.
What should that be?
fritz
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief
Hi,
It is not meant to be all-inclusive. Anyone in the world from anywhere in
the world can send email in any character set, but my customers can choose
to not receive messages containing specific character sets. It is a list
organized by general geographic region, which my customers can choose to
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> See attached.
not a reliable list.
i live in italy, and that's what i get for a mail with italian characters
iso-8859-1
charset="iso-8859-1";
(tested for subject and body)
while your files suggest :
# Weste
would it be possible to give me *one* list?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief sur
> Does somebody have a list of Character Sets ?
http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
See attached.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Fritz Borgstedt
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:51 AM
> To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SM
Does somebody have a list of Character Sets ?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief s
--On Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:55:28 -0500 Amy Stinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I was just wondering how ASSP does sender verification?
|
| Does ASSP utilize callbacks to do sender verification?
No mail system does authentication, and it's up to the sending system to do
authorisation
i wonder if large messages (usually because of attachments) are still
subject to "External Attachment Blocking" filter
(and how do i disable thtat feature ? setting "This Size" to 0 is correct ?)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash
>Does ASSP utilize callbacks to do sender verification?
I should be p... that you think I would implement such a feature ))).
No, we do not. And we will not, at least as long as I doing the work
)).
fritz
-
Take Surveys.
>
> The feature was broken and is back now even better: you can now decide
> to just validate the PTR without setting Lookup for Missing PTR to be
> active. ))
>
fritz, you're da man !
confirmed working in (69)
-
Take Sur
>I was just wondering how ASSP does sender verification?
it doesn't.
> Does ASSP utilize callbacks to do sender verification?
nope. And i hope it never will.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join So
I was just wondering how ASSP does sender verification?
Does ASSP utilize callbacks to do sender verification?
Amy
Amy Stinson
Amy's Answers, LLC
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.amys-answers.com
phone: 317.885-1741
> example incoming mail with assp list (trendmicro log)
> << MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [c38:400]
Note no SIZE=
> example outgoing mail (trendmicro log)
> << EHLO exchange.mydomain.fr [3bc:768]
> << MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=3505 [3bc:768]
Note there IS a SIZE=
> all outside s
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>now i can't tell if that feature is broken 1.2.7.1(68), or i'm not
>receiving
>spam triggering that check, or i did something in my config to
>disable that
>filter.
The feature was broken and is back now even better: you
> > (btw, i have have zero "Invalid PTR:" in my stats, so i can't tell if
> > that
> > works)
> Have you searched your log for "PTR missing"?
yes, ah i have them in my logs
>
> Do you have "Reversed Lookup" set to "3 = score only"?
yes, that feature is working, adds score to the PB entry. but tha
>(btw, i have have zero "Invalid PTR:" in my stats, so i can't tell if
>that
>works)
try the latest built (69)
>
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get t
2007/1/23, Marrco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (btw, i have have zero "Invalid PTR:" in my stats, so i can't tell if that
> works)
Have you searched your log for "PTR missing"?
Using ASSP v1.2.7.1(68) you should see something like:
Jan-23-07 hh:mm:ss 65.70.243.86 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/23/0220218.shtml
About four threads down there is a discussion on how this is called
'greylisting' and is now 'almost completely useless'. Too bad they
don't seem to utilize any kind of PB, whitelist obeying,
greylist-whitelist, or nodelay ip list.
JJJ
Yay
> If your server anounce that he it is not esmtp supporting?>
look at my precedent post, log imss
inside -> outside : ehlo with my exchange server.
exchange->assp->imss->internet
ouside -> inside seems always helo
internet->assp->imss->internet
sorry for my questions...
Doug Traylor wrote:
> Even if we had external users(not physically connected to our internal
> network), we would have their email clients connect directly to our MTA on
> auth port 587 that wuold then send from the MTA through ASSP the same way
> for outgoing only. All outgoing email is routed
internet -> firewall DMZ-> assp -> trendmicro IMSS -> firewall inside ->
Exchange
example incoming mail with assp list (trendmicro log)
Scan Queue Size: <0> Current Connections: <1> [c38:a84]
ACL check OK, connection accepted from peer [c38:a84]
<< HELO lists-outbound.sourceforge.net [c38:4
>
>> May be no incoming mail is telling your server the size. (ESMTP not
>> supported)
>
>perhaps... but all ?
If your server anounce that he it is not esmtp supporting?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>it looks to me that cpu use has rised a little in the last few
>builds, and
>delaying triplests have doubled.
>
>i think that's due to a change in processing order (maybe you put
>delaying
>before helo check) . Is that corre
> May be no incoming mail is telling your server the size. (ESMTP not>
> supported)
perhaps... but all ?
Jérôme
_
Exprimez-vous : créez la page d'accueil qui vous ressemble avec Live.com.
http://www.live.com/getstarted
it looks to me that cpu use has rised a little in the last few builds, and
delaying triplests have doubled.
i think that's due to a change in processing order (maybe you put delaying
before helo check) . Is that correct ?
(btw, i have have zero "Invalid PTR:" in my stats, so i can't tell if tha
>> My internal email does not go to ASSP. All my internal clients,
>> including
>> from VPN traffic, goes directly to our email server application. Only
>> email
>> that is routed to the outside or from the outside goes through ASSP and
>> my
>> AV layers. I have very strict rules in place fo
2007/1/23, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
May be no incoming mail is telling your server the size. (ESMTP not
supported)
Or is there another smtp-proxy between the outside mailservers and assp?
Some firewalls have a smtp-proxy functionality...
Such a smtp-proxy may filter some or all
> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:02:33 +0100
> From: "Przemek Czerkas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I have noticed that this function does not block all types of
> > obfuscated URIs.
>
> Please post a real-world example of such URIs.
Maybe it doesn't work at all (including up to 1.2.7.1 (68). I hav
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Fair call, but I was rather more interested in the list of what the
>'other
>things!' might be.
You are surely joking but...
it is Open Source, you can read it.
fritz
--
> From: "William Stucke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "When enabled, messages with obfuscated URIs of types
> [integer/octal/hex IP, other things!] in the body will
> receive URIBLPolicyError SMTP error code."
Fair call, but I was rather more interested in the list of what the 'other
things!' migh
> But, I need to change this security reason.
> I'm creating the Debian assp package, and I need to change this.
>
> Thanks again in the help.
>
Another option would be to turn off local logging and log through syslog
instead.
Lars
-
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Message Skipped: Size 1740518 > 10
>for outgoing messages nothing for incoming...
May be no incoming mail is telling your server the size. (ESMTP not
supported)
---
> >but for me it's seem that is only for outgoing mail... wrong ?> > wrong.> It
> >is for mails with a SIZE parm.> > fb
Thanks,
ok for size-parm, but in my log i have only this
Message Skipped: Size 1740518 > 10
for outgoing messages nothing for incoming...
_
75 matches
Mail list logo
