Just what the title says. If you send a correction email to spam/notspam
with 5 attached spam/notspams, it will only process one of the
attachments and discard the rest. Why is this, and can it be fixed?
David
-
This SF.net
how can i get access to the current 'private beta' area at
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/0001B38B-801C/ASSP-Private/S05D636E1?WasRead=1
?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/private-beta--tf3775958.html#a10677111
Sent from the assp-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello
I am the owner of grscripts. To clarify , I am not paying a license fee
for assp , sorry for confusion (!) , my fault.
Simply , Fritz was not appreciating the fact that I was selling
something with his product included .
I agreed with him on this point (100%) ,we reached an agreement , and
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Watkins
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:11 PM
> To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Error after data recovery
>
>
> > -Origi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of List Receiver
> Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 3:08 p.m.
> To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Error after data recovery
>
>
> > -Orig
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:40 AM
> To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Error after data recovery
>
> List Receiver wrote:
David wrote:
>> Nothing got licensed, since the code is GPL you can can't charge for the
>> right to use it(you can charge for a fee for distribution) unless you
>> are the original developer and you license it under a different license,
>> and since Fritz does not hold the copyright on all the
> Nothing got licensed, since the code is GPL you can can't charge for the
> right to use it(you can charge for a fee for distribution) unless you
> are the original developer and you license it under a different license,
> and since Fritz does not hold the copyright on all the ASSP code he can
David wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> It appears Fritz struck a deal with the developer of those scripts to
>>> officially support them. Hopefully Fritz got a big bonus since the guy is
>>> passing the cost on to his customers with a 33% increase in their cost
>>> according to what you poste
Charles Marcus wrote:
>> It appears Fritz struck a deal with the developer of those scripts to
>> officially support them. Hopefully Fritz got a big bonus since the guy is
>> passing the cost on to his customers with a 33% increase in their cost
>> according to what you posted.
>>
>
> Man,
> It appears Fritz struck a deal with the developer of those scripts to
> officially support them. Hopefully Fritz got a big bonus since the guy is
> passing the cost on to his customers with a 33% increase in their cost
> according to what you posted.
Man, I hope Fritz got a good deal too...
Yes it is and it responds to all mails which I send it. Only from web
messaging addresses which I include in body of message will not be deleted
or added.
Mark
Kevin-107 wrote:
>
> Mark G wrote:
>> Hi Doug..
>>
>> I do not have set this "Send All Remote Mail Through Gateway", but I have
>> s
Little update
when deleting from redlist, message contains email address of address which
I have defined to be redlist deletion. eg. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not
emails I included in body.
Which is the correct way to send mail to assp email interface? Is the
problem there? From desktop client I send ad
Mark G wrote:
> Hi Doug..
>
> I do not have set this "Send All Remote Mail Through Gateway", but I have
> set up DNS entry to spamdomain (really not that name). I have setup
> spamdomain to our DNS. spamdomain is same address as imail.
> whitelist/redlist email address work with spamdomain but no
Hi Doug..
I do not have set this "Send All Remote Mail Through Gateway", but I have
set up DNS entry to spamdomain (really not that name). I have setup
spamdomain to our DNS. spamdomain is same address as imail.
whitelist/redlist email address work with spamdomain but not with
@mydomain.com as e
Doug Traylor wrote:
>> " As of 13 May 2007 , Assp Deluxe for Cpanel is officially supported by
>> Fritz Borgstedt, ASSP main developer.
>> To cover assp license fee starting from 01 Jun 2007 the price per license
>> will be raised to $20.00 . "
>
> It appears Fritz struck a deal with the developer
Yes, I will get answers from email interface on both cases. But when I send
message from imail's web messaging system, answer from assp email interface
does not contain any added addresses (log soft redlist addtion but not any
addresses also). When sending email software (client machine) email
int
> That site is for ASSP Deluxe, it's some code that integrates ASSP into
> cpanel(perhaps you should have read the site a bit?).
I read that site, and it's clearly written that they will have to raise the
price for their product to cover "assp license fee"
So I was just reporting something that'
List Receiver wrote:
> A client's server crashed and I was able to recover *most* of the
> data from the drive that contained an ASSP install. I installed the
> latest ActivePerl, added all the needed modules, and even unzipped an
> upgrade zip of 1.2.6 on top of it to make sure most of the files
> " As of 13 May 2007 , Assp Deluxe for Cpanel is officially supported by
> Fritz Borgstedt, ASSP main developer.
> To cover assp license fee starting from 01 Jun 2007 the price per license
> will be raised to $20.00 . "
It appears Fritz struck a deal with the developer of those scripts to
offici
Marrco wrote:
> Asp license fee ? what's that ? ain't it free software anymore ? it moved
> from free to fee ? And who's collecting the "assp license fee" ?
>
> I found the news about this on
>
> http://www.grscripts.com/
>
> " As of 13 May 2007 , Assp Deluxe for Cpanel is officially supported
Asp license fee ? what's that ? ain't it free software anymore ? it moved
from free to fee ? And who's collecting the "assp license fee" ?
I found the news about this on
http://www.grscripts.com/
" As of 13 May 2007 , Assp Deluxe for Cpanel is officially supported by
Fritz Borgstedt, ASSP main
Hi,
I've been getting a few emails with bits of the header in the body. I've
attached a message that this happens to. The headers look like the
following:
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Enc
The latest builts have a rather dramatic change in handling testmode
and spamlover.
ASSP being in testmode or encountering spamlovers would stop
filtering.
Now there are options that the checking continues:
slScoringMode,"Message Scoring Modus"
&
testScoringMode,"Message Scoring Modus"
'Put the
> Sending from web messaging is bit different, somehow.
Sending from web messaging is a lot different. A desktop client can be
configured to hit ASSP first. Imail's, and most other, web messaging can
not. End of story.
The Imail server is running the web messaging application. Emails that a
> You run now less than FOUR Antivirus processes, at least two of which are
> ClamAV? Why so many? Why would one instance of ClamAV catch something that
> the previous instance hasn't?
Process 1 is ASSP, an excellent application with lots of support from Fritz.
It works well with Clam, but still
>But I dont know why whitelist and redlist do not work.
Do you really know, that is not working?
For testing purpose
send [EMAIL PROTECTED] to addwhite
then
send [EMAIL PROTECTED] to removewhite
Do you get answers from the email interface?
fritz
I will try this second smtp server system when I can. But if assp respond me
with the redlist addition message, i think that mail actually goes to ASSP.
But I dont know why whitelist and redlist do not work. Is it because it is
on same IP address? I have read many messages that with imail I need s
Here are the logs:
Mail from web messaging
ASSPLOG:
May-17-07 17:41:38 Connected: 195.156.xxx.yyy:1175 -> 195.156.xxx.yyy:25 ->
127.0.0.1:225
May-17-07 17:41:38 id-94128984 195.156.xxx.yyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> email redlist
addition
May-17-07 17:41:38 id-94128985 195.156.xxx.yyy <> is disconnected
Doug Traylor said: -
> incoming:
Internet ->
ASSP(with ClamAV) ->
SMTP gateway #1 (AV) ->
SMTP gateway #2 (hMailserver with ClamAV and can use multiple additional
AV's - also routes incoming emails to different servers based on recipient
domain)
SMTP gateway #3 (AV - file type blocker) -> MTA (Ima
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Lytle
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:34 AM
> To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Error after data recovery
>
> List Receiver wr
> I think the problem is that I need a "psuedo-domain" so that
> the web client won't treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (etc.) as local but
> force it to use SMTP for such addresses. I know I've read something
> about this, but I can't put my hands on it.
Correct, while it must be defined as local in ASSP,
Doug,
You helped me on this via the IMail list, and the IMail webclient is
able populate the whitelist, but I still have a hang up on the e-mail
interface. I think the problem is that I need a "psuedo-domain" so that
the web client won't treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (etc.) as local but
force it to use
> Have anyone solved the web messaging problem with imail. I have 2006 imail
> and ASSP 1.3.2 installed on same box. Everything seems to work fine, but
> only thing which I have not been able to solve is that when users send
> messages from web messaging; whitelist is not populated.
> My mail flow
List Receiver wrote:
> A client's server crashed and I was able to recover *most* of the data from
> the drive that contained an ASSP install. I installed the latest ActivePerl,
> added all the needed modules, and even unzipped an upgrade zip of 1.2.6 on
> top of it to make sure most of the fil
>Hello
>
>anyone can explain me what does mean Regex:Red 'bounce' ?
There is "bounce" in your redre-file?
Abd by that this messages will not ce collected?
fritz
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2
>ASSP log have a line for example redlist addition but nothing happens
>on
>that list.
If ASSP shows something of this kind in the log, you can stop worrying
about authentication.
Please show the logentries.
fritz
-
This S
37 matches
Mail list logo
