>
> Rick Klinge wrote:
> > Does the denySMTPConnectionsFrom no longer support class c submask?
> >
> > 12.129.156.
> > 12.130.136.
> > 12.144.36.179
> > 12.153.196.213
> > 12.159.73.217
>
> That format will work fine.
> I haven't seen anything contradictory so far.
>
> What version of ASSP are
Gregor Reich wrote:
>> Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for
>> changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks
>> don't change their time stamp even if the file it's pointing to does.
>>
> I tried to overcome this problem by using hardlinks -
Rick Klinge wrote:
> Does the denySMTPConnectionsFrom no longer support class c submask?
>
> 12.129.156.
> 12.130.136.
> 12.144.36.179
> 12.153.196.213
> 12.159.73.217
That format will work fine.
I haven't seen anything contradictory so far.
What version of ASSP are you using?
Kevin
Gregor Reich wrote:
>> Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for
>> changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks
>> don't change their time stamp even if the file it's pointing to does.
>>
>>
> I tried to overcome this problem by using hard
Marrco wrote:
>> stops scoring. If you have 10 RBL providers, and the minimum score to 2,
>> a message won't be scored higher for 3 hits than 7 hits.
>>
>> Perhaps you could assign a score like 15 to each hit (instead of 30 for
>> rbl fail, and 15 for rbl neutral), so one or two hits might not be
>
> Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for
> changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks
> don't change their time stamp even if the file it's pointing to does.
>
I tried to overcome this problem by using hardlinks - still the same.
Why doe
> machine (running linux and ASSP 1.2.6), I use Symlinks in the
> base directory of each installation that point to the
Assp doesn't really like symlinks. The database files are polled for
changes and reread if a change (in time stamp) is detected. Symlinks
don't change their time stamp even if
Does the denySMTPConnectionsFrom no longer support class c submask?
12.129.156.
12.130.136.
12.144.36.179
12.153.196.213
12.159.73.217
Thanks,
Rick
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - t
Hi everyone
Because I'm sharing spamdb, delaydb, spam/notspam folders and the
whitelist among different installations one the same machine (running
linux and ASSP 1.2.6), I use Symlinks in the base directory of each
installation that point to the corresponding files/directories in a
"shared" d
Do you have ASSP log entries showing when this happens? What version of
ASSP? Running on what platform? Any other relevant information?
Nate
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE ve
It seems random messages sent from the outside in are getting this type of
error back from their mail server. What might the problem be? thank you
Hi. This is the at mail.somewherel.com.
I encountered a problem trying to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
I will keep trying to del
David wrote:
> Just what the title says. If you send a correction email to spam/notspam
> with 5 attached spam/notspams, it will only process one of the
> attachments and discard the rest. Why is this, and can it be fixed?
Because currently this is how it works - you can only process one
messag
> I am the owner of grscripts. To clarify , I am not paying a license fee
> for assp , sorry for confusion (!) , my fault.
> Simply , Fritz was not appreciating the fact that I was selling
> something with his product included .
> I agreed with him on this point (100%) ,we reached an agreement ,
Hello
I read from assp docs
>
After a few months you may want to clear out some of the files in the
errors/spam and errors/notspam folder, especially if these folders are
becoming quite large. At some point I'll write a utility to do this
automatically, but I haven't written it yet. For now i
Hi,
The unique ID logging option is a little buggy i think:
May-18-07 00:20:13 id-94404123 60.203.161.14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
adding new triplet: (60.203.161.0,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED])
May-18-07 00:20:13 id-94404123 60.203.161.14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
recipient delayed: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Matti Haack wrote:
>
> Here?
> http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/
yepp - seems that the password protection has been removed ;-)
thx for the heads up.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/private-beta--tf3775958.html#a10679456
Sent from the assp-user mailing list archive at
Here?
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/
> how can i get access to the current 'private beta' area at
> http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/0001B38B-801C/ASSP-Private/S05D636E1?WasRead=1
> ?
Matti
-
Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh
Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau
+49 851 50477-22 Fax: +4
17 matches
Mail list logo
