Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>
> That is not necessary.
>
> fritz
>
>
But surely you see the difference between the two methods we are
discussing here? Neutral scoring is not the same as a separate lower
scoring method
-
This S
On these two strings lack the new line char (\r\n) ?
assp 1.3.2 (49)
$this->{myheader}.="X-Assp-Received-RWL: lookup skipped (noRWL
sender)" if $AddRWLHeader;
$this->{myheader}.="X-Assp-Received-URIBL: lookup skipped (noURIBL
sender)" if $AddURIBLHeader;
sorry for my english...
Thank
Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a whitelist
addition message:
May-20-07 12:30:58 Connected: 192.168.0.6:2210 -> 192.168.0.5:25 ->
192.168.0.1:25
May-20-07 12:30:59 192.168.0.6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> email whitelist addition
May-20-07 12:30:59 Email whitelist addition: [EMA
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> In the newest built is an
> Response Delay After Greeting
> The number of seconds ASSP will wait to answer a banner greeting . No
> delay is imposed if the field is left blank or set to 0.
> (10 seconds is max for security)
>
>
> Please try it.
>
Banner delay i
>> If i put => 10 then the function is discarded.
>>
>
> sorry max is 9.
>
>
Ok, maybe it is better or endusers to use 10 when input => 10 ?
>> Is the implementation different from the testing delay which was in
>> other versions before ?
>>
>
> yep, Wim and me are trying a differen
>Hi Fritz,
>
>If i put => 10 then the function is discarded.
sorry max is 9.
>Is the implementation different from the testing delay which was in
>other versions before ?
yep, Wim and me are trying a different approach.
>Is it possible to disconnect immediatly when someone send data when
>th
Hi Fritz,
If i put => 10 then the function is discarded.
Is the implementation different from the testing delay which was in
other versions before ?
Is it possible to disconnect immediatly when someone send data when the
delay is in progress ?
Fritz Borgstedt schreef:
> In the newest built is
>Cute. Now you're just being difficult.
>
>neutral will only score if the RBL check receives less than
>minimumhits;
>and the quality, scope, or type of the rbl that provides the hit is
>not
>taken into account
That is not necessary.
fritz
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> The low score is already built in, it is called "neutral".
>
> fritz
>
Cute. Now you're just being difficult.
neutral will only score if the RBL check receives less than minimumhits;
and the quality, scope, or type of the rbl that provides the hit is not
taken into ac
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>
>The "Low Scoring" List would be another list of rbl/uribl providers
>that
>would like to use, but assign a lower score to. This way one could
>use
>dynamic ip, day old bread, and other less-reliable blacklists and not
>wo
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> May be SA is a better solution for you, they have a similar vision.
> Sorry, my vision is different.
>
> fritz
>
I just had a thought, maybe you could meet me halfway. How about for
some of the lists (rbl/uribl (and perhaps bombre/scriptre)), there be an
alternative "L
I'm sorry, I almost forgot. In this list you linked:
http://www.marshal.com/trace/spam_statistics.asp
You'll find the US behind both Asia and Europe in terms of spam output
by continent.
I'm sure that if you divided the US into states (geographical regions as
large as many of the whole countri
William Stucke wrote:
> The USA _still_ remains the single largest source of spam in the world, as
> measured by every reference above.
>
> Those of us who don't live there find the assumption by those who do that
> mail from other countries can legitimately be blocked automatically
> offensive.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
>Those of us who don't live there find the assumption by those who do
>that
>mail from other countries can legitimately be blocked automatically
>offensive.
fritz
-
This SF.net email is sp
David said:
> Now I know that not _all_ email from Asia is spam, but a lot of it is
Now I know that not _all_ email from the USA is spam, but a lot of it is ...
See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/countries.lasso 53% by sources
http://research.ciphertrust.com/statistics.php 38
> in the newest built is an
> Response Delay After Greeting
> The number of seconds ASSP will wait to answer a banner greeting . No
> delay is imposed if the field is left blank or set to 0.
> (10 seconds is max for security)
>
>
> Please try it.
Still getting
$modversion='(49)'; #appended
In the newest built is an
Response Delay After Greeting
The number of seconds ASSP will wait to answer a banner greeting . No
delay is imposed if the field is left blank or set to 0.
(10 seconds is max for security)
Please try it.
> Symlink the folder the whitelist is in and not the whitelist itself.
>
Pretty smart - I'll do it like this, switching to mysql as soon as I
have time to set it up.
Big thx to all who helped!
Gregor.
-
This SF.net ema
>auto-whitelisting on outgoing mail, trainable bayesian filter, and
>email
>interface.
This is all unchanged from version 1.1.10, no need to upgrade.
In my installation Bayesian (witout any addition checks) catches 5 %,
so we are here on very different footing.
fritz
--
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> Something about "death by a thousand papercuts" versus a few tests
>> killing a message is what I envision.
>>
>
> May be SA is a better solution for you, they have a similar vision.
> Sorry, my vision is different.
>
> fritz
>
That's becoming more and more clear,
>Something about "death by a thousand papercuts" versus a few tests
>killing a message is what I envision.
May be SA is a better solution for you, they have a similar vision.
Sorry, my vision is different.
fritz
-
This SF
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> So you might only
>> have it score 4-6 (out of a total 45), so it will add in with the
>> rest,
>> but not be a fatal hit in and of itself.
>>
>
> Are you talking ASSP here?
>
> fritz
>
Yes, I'm talking about a theoretical scoring model in which I would
assign a
Kevin-107 wrote:
> Nothing got licensed, since the code is GPL you can can't charge for the
> right to use it(you can charge for a fee for distribution) unless you
> are the original developer and you license it under a different license,
> and since Fritz does not hold the copyright on all th
>So you might only
>have it score 4-6 (out of a total 45), so it will add in with the
>rest,
>but not be a fatal hit in and of itself.
Are you talking ASSP here?
fritz
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Down
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Sorry, I see our current approach as a much better solution.
> Obviously you are not seeing the power in the current approach.
>
> fritz
Another blacklist that would be good for scoring, but not for outright
killing a message is "Day Old Bread" at http://support-intelligen
25 matches
Mail list logo
