Hi,
1.3.2 (build 55) keeps crashing on Lin and Win machines. Log doesn't
tell that much but it keeps crashing at delay greeting as far as i can see:
May-22-07 07:30:29 Delaying greeting for 68.201.127.191 - duration 10
seconds
May-22-07 07:30:39 Connected: 68.201.127.191:3475 -> xx.xxx.x.162:25
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> How do I download/install the beta versions?
>
Is there an easier way than individually downloading each file from
http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/S05D636E1?WasRead=1
--
Daniel
--
Kevin wrote:
> Dave Emory wrote:
>> Dave Emory wrote:
>>> Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a
>>> whitelist addition message:
>>>
>>> May-20-07 12:30:58 Connected: 192.168.0.6:2210 -> 192.168.0.5:25 ->
>>> 192.168.0.1:25
>>> May-20-07 12:30:59 192.168.0.6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dave Emory wrote:
> Dave Emory wrote:
>> Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a whitelist
>> addition message:
>>
>> May-20-07 12:30:58 Connected: 192.168.0.6:2210 -> 192.168.0.5:25 ->
>> 192.168.0.1:25
>> May-20-07 12:30:59 192.168.0.6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> email whitelist
>> ad
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> If the whitelist is modified, ASSP seems to delete the
>> whitelist file (which is in fact a symlink) and creates a new one
>> with
>> the modified data in it.
>
> You are sure this is done by ASSP?
>
> rebuildspamdb.pl is "repairing" the whitelist in every run.
It's
Dave Emory wrote:
> Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a whitelist
> addition message:
>
> May-20-07 12:30:58 Connected: 192.168.0.6:2210 -> 192.168.0.5:25 ->
> 192.168.0.1:25
> May-20-07 12:30:59 192.168.0.6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> email whitelist
> addition May-20-07 12:30:59
>Is there an easy way to tell?
>
>I downloaded ASSP_1.3.1-Install.zip from sourceforge
>
>it says it's platform-independent.
I looked into the distribution, assp.pl is a file with DOS-endings,
most of us have obviously no problems with that. (I deliver always
with *ix endings)
fritz
On my site
On May 21, 2007, at 4:32 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>> I try to run the assp.pl script and get the error: ": bad
>> interpreter: No such file or directory".
>
> Bad line endings in pl file?
> windowsformat instead of *ix
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
> I try to run the assp.pl script and get the error: ": bad
>interpreter: No such file or directory".
Bad line endings in pl file?
windowsformat instead of *ix format?
fritz
Hi Everyone,
Been lurking for a little bit trying to see if ASSP might work good
for stopping spam on my server, and I believe it will... I tried to
set it up today, and ran into a little trouble, after installing all
the required and recommend perl modules, editing /etc/services and /
etc
Hi Folks
I Switched DEBUG mode on and noticed the difference about mails send from
imails web messaging and mails from client app. ASSP does not see added
emails as email addresses. Messages sent from web messaging is seen like
this "testi=40testi22.com=" as it should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] I teste
On receiving a message to the asspspam/asspnotspam addresses, how does
ASSP handle that message in the spam/notspam/okmail stores? Is there a
signature it recognizes and moves them? Or are they ignored and
overridden with the correctedspam/correctednotspam stores?
--
Daniel
---
How do I download/install the beta versions?
--
Daniel
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to ge
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>I suggested a few
>hours ago to bypass nodelay.txt, ipwl.txt and ipnp.txt (and maybe
>more), and
>.51 has a bypass for nodelay.
It had the bypass for nodelay (and more "bypasses") from the
beginning.
fritz
-
> I'm anxious to try this in ASSP. I've used Response Delays with other
software and
> found it very effective. But I've used much longer delays (up to 40
seconds) and
> I've also used delays after every command. One feature that I've found
> works very well and helps to reduce the amount of tim
>The paper mentioned another interesting idea about
>this...if a spammer was to send out tens of thousands of messages, and
>everyone was hitting the spamertised web server to analyze the
>content,
>it
>may act as a DoS against that web server, sort of causing the spammer
>to
>shoot himself in his
Or http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/ASSP_Toolbar_for_Outlook
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=assp+toolbar&btnG=Google+Search
>
> third link.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FRE
Sounds like a bandwidth hog.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Bahrami
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:56 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] Crawling URL's in messages and then doing
Bayesiananalysis
I read a whi
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=assp+toolbar&btnG=Google+Search
third link.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Bahrami
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:58 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Best Practice to
Ideally, you should let your users report spam and not spam. One of the
greatest things about assp is it lets you delegate that task to the users,
who really are the ultimate authority in regards to what is spam and what is
not.
That being said, there is a recent post about an Outlook toolbar fo
I read a white paper several weeks ago in which someone (I don't remember
who) was discussing anti-spam ideas. One of the ideas he proposed was for a
spam filter to identify the URL's in a message and then crawl the page and
perform Bayesian analysis on the page content. The score is passed to t
I'm anxious to try this in ASSP. I've used Response Delays with other software
and found it very effective. But I've used much longer delays (up to 40
seconds) and I've also used delays after every command. One feature that I've
found works very well and helps to reduce the amount of time you ar
A few consideration :
since we already have the connecting IP address we could skip the check for
known good hosts, that is :
IP addresses in nodelay.txt, ipwl.txt and ipnp.txt
And (optional, I'm not sure if it makes sense or that's a plain wrong idea)
skip also for :
-) PB autowhitebox (don't
it seems to me that there is a (minor) problem with message scoring in (53)
at least for the RBL hits:
May-21-07 12:51:30 id-97446900 84.144.243.64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RBLCache:scoring: - 84.144.243.64 rejected by combined.njabl.org
(07-05-21/12:44)
> May-21-07 12:51:30 id-97446900 84.144.243.64
it seems that there is a (minor) problem within logging in (53) - at least
those entries are new to me...
May-21-07 12:44:51 Message-Score: 0+InvalidAddress (2)
> May-21-07 12:44:51 id-97442883 189.3.83.81 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PB:
> 45.0.0.0 score: 0+InvalidAddress => 0 reason:2
> May-21-07 12:4
Hi,
I wonder which mail client I could use to manually process the spam
folder and move the false-positive to notspam folder.
Is there any possibilities to use thunderbird like software , maybe with
two-ways conversions tools .
Does anyone have good experience with this ?
Thanks
Gauthier
-
>>> Please try it.
>
>> Huge load on my server. I lowered to 3 seconds, but still heavy load. I fear
>> I could not resist a dictionary attack or some large spam storm, so I turned
>> that off
> Strange, i did see the huge load on the first implementation, but with the
> new version i do not get h
>Strange, i did see the huge load on the first implementation, but
>with the new version i do not get high loads (tested it on linux and
>win)
ASSP will accept *more* connections in the same timeframe and it may
be wise to set maxconnections to 64 or 96.
Nevertheless the statistics should show a
Please try it.
Huge load on my server. I lowered to 3 seconds, but still heavy load. I fear
I could not resist a dictionary attack or some large spam storm, so I turned
that off
Strange, i did see the huge load on the first implementation, but
with the new version i do not get high load
> Please try it.
Huge load on my server. I lowered to 3 seconds, but still heavy load. I fear
I could not resist a dictionary attack or some large spam storm, so I turned
that off
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Expr
Hello,
Couldn't it be easyly implemented if ASSP takes - as before RBLmaxhits as
limit, but allow to add only a score (from 0 to 1), which you specify
behind (or in a second list for compatibility) the Blacklist-name to the hits
counter?
Fritz, do you think this will rise the CPU load or memory
31 matches
Mail list logo
