Re: [Assp-user] Feature request: additional Spam Tag

2007-07-31 Thread David
I'm familiar with this implementation from SpamAssassin. I'm not seeing it's utility, however. How is it different from using TotalScore to filter messages? How is "maybe spam"/"spam" different from the Low/High Threshold settings? What do you find lacking in the current options? Matti Haack w

Re: [Assp-user] Refusing SMTP connections

2007-07-31 Thread Doug Traylor
Kevin wrote: Travis Forghani wrote: No, I don't think using the enter key is the problem. Actually i was talking about the large run-on paragraph. . Oh, God! LOL! Doug - This SF.net email is

Re: [Assp-user] Important FYI for SaneSecurity users

2007-07-31 Thread Doug Lytle
Doug Traylor wrote: > Kevin wrote: > >> http://sanesecurity.blogspot.com/2007/07/important-signature-location.html >> >> > Thanks for the heads up! > > Yep, thanks! -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve

Re: [Assp-user] Important FYI for SaneSecurity users

2007-07-31 Thread Doug Traylor
Kevin wrote: > If you haven't updated your download scripts to use the new round-robin > urls yet, you need to do so immediately. The old download urls are no > longer valid. > > http://sanesecurity.blogspot.com/2007/07/important-signature-location.html > Thanks for the heads up! Doug --

[Assp-user] Important FYI for SaneSecurity users

2007-07-31 Thread Kevin
If you haven't updated your download scripts to use the new round-robin urls yet, you need to do so immediately. The old download urls are no longer valid. http://sanesecurity.blogspot.com/2007/07/important-signature-location.html Kevin -

Re: [Assp-user] Refusing SMTP connections

2007-07-31 Thread Kevin
Travis Forghani wrote: > No, I don't think using the enter key is the problem. Actually i was talking about the large run-on paragraph. It's harder to read your message when it's all strung together like that. > Kevin wrote: >> Travis Forghani wrote: >> >>> Is ASSP having any issues with SMTP

Re: [Assp-user] Thoughts on rampant beta use

2007-07-31 Thread Charles Marcus
>> I'm wondering if verbiage like...: >> >> "Fritz Borgstedt's website is where the most current cutting edge betas >> can be found. >> http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/"; >> >> ...should be removed from the Stable Releases to help deter >> uninformed/inexperienced beta use? Or, at

Re: [Assp-user] Refusing SMTP connections

2007-07-31 Thread Travis Forghani
No, I don't think using the enter key is the problem. It happens even when we forward spam to the spam report address. I'll have to turn logging on. I'll do that and in a few days post the logs to the list. sincerely, Travis Forghani IT Administrator Bowman Enterprises, Inc. Cell: 919-795-

[Assp-user] Feature request: additional Spam Tag

2007-07-31 Thread Matti Haack
As I switched to single message scoring, it would be great to have the spam score in a format that is easyly to filter in mail client. Spamassasin uses besides the spam score an additional "graphical" spam tag: X-Spam-Level: ** Assp could add a * for every 10 (or configurable) Spam-Score-Point

Re: [Assp-user] Virus scoring

2007-07-31 Thread Matti Haack
Thats exactly the reason for my suggestion. As I don't trust these sansecurity definitions completely, I would like to give them a lower score, so that they are not blocked, but marked as spam. If it would possible to implement this feature without hazzle, it would be great to have it Matti