Graziano said:
> What version are you running ?
1.3.3.2 (what was final)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration file
I have exportExtremeFileDeny checked, but nothing is getting denied because
the exported file has only 1 line in it right now. It should have over 7000
addresses in it. The log has lines like this:
Aug-11-07 16:49:36 [PBextreme][monitoring] 66.97.166.187
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug Lytle wrote:
> Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
>> A new set of forums are in the works for just such a separation.
>>
> Forums or mailing lists?
Forums.
Mainly to replace the sf.net forums already in use that are seriously
lacking in features.
There are a good chuck of people who don't like to
Bruce wrote:
> I am upgrading from 1.1.3 to 1.3.1.
> Mac OS X 10.4.10
> PPC
>
> the install/upgrade instructions are somewhat unclear.
> "If you unzip it in the parent folder of ASSP it should automatically
> extract to the right folder."
>
> the parent folder of assp is local
> when i try to unz
>> Be careful what you wish, you may get it.
>>
>
>Great :)
There is a new mailing list available:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
There is also an email-based interface for users
you can get info about using it by sending a message
with just the word `help' as sub
On 11 Aug 2007 at 18:00, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
[snipped]
>
> May be recently. Not so recently I answered a lot to new users and
> others did here too. The current situation is an emergency we did not
> have before.
Yes, indeed. We're aware of it. Thanks.
I doubt that it is very useful to have
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>since recent there is almost nothing for an [Average-Assp-user] and
>*definitely* nothing for a [New-Assp-User].
May be recently. Not so recently I answered a lot to new users and
others did here too. The current situation
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> A new set of forums are in the works for just such a separation.
>
Forums or mailing lists?
Forums require the subscribed user to go to them, mailing lists come to the
subscribed user.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
> we do not scan the header, we scan the data for "forged bounce check".
Good to know.
Now i'm curious to test if your scan is different from what I'm already
checking in data (and headers) to block generic backscatter...
-
Katip wrote:
> IMHO rename this group to something like "ASSP-Test-User" whatever.
> since recent there is almost nothing for an [Average-Assp-user] and
> *definitely* nothing for a [New-Assp-User].
>
> it's a good idea to open various mailing lists with different
> concerns like Assp-Power, Ass
Fritz, all,
IMHO rename this group to something like "ASSP-Test-User" whatever.
since recent there is almost nothing for an [Average-Assp-user] and
*definitely* nothing for a [New-Assp-User].
it's a good idea to open various mailing lists with different
concerns like Assp-Power, Assp-Beta, Ass
>It's not always easy to use header regex to identify *just* the
>connecting
>helo. And I could decide to block ie. localhost.domain from
>connecting my
>MTA, but accept mail that in a previous stage (up in the received
>lines) had
>a localhost.localdomain
we do not scan the header, we scan the
> In trying to built a better 1.3.3.2 a feature slipped into it which
> was planned for 1.3.4 at a later time.
> But so can test it anyway.
>
> The feature is called "Identify Forged Bounces" and uses your
> "MyServerRe" list in section Sender Validation to identify regular /
> forged bounces.
> Th
I am upgrading from 1.1.3 to 1.3.1.
Mac OS X 10.4.10
PPC
the install/upgrade instructions are somewhat unclear.
"If you unzip it in the parent folder of ASSP it should automatically
extract to the right folder."
the parent folder of assp is local
when i try to unzip in there, it says the folder i
In trying to built a better 1.3.3.2 a feature slipped into it which
was planned for 1.3.4 at a later time.
But so can test it anyway.
The feature is called "Identify Forged Bounces" and uses your
"MyServerRe" list in section Sender Validation to identify regular /
forged bounces.
There are option
>Would you also try the last 1.3.3.2 please.
I forgot to mention that by mixing my versions to built a better
1.3.3.2 a new feature slipped into 1.3.3.2 which was planned later on
for 1.3.4.
It is working inside the Analyze Tool and helps to identify the
regular expression match in bomb rege
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>100% CPU Usage is not the problem
Be aware that the basic for the assp cpu % number is the the slice of
total cpu ASSP got.
Means:
If ASSP (PID number can be seen on left side of the GUI) uses 30% of
total CPU (measured w
What version are you running ?
> I don't think this is the same thing Graziano. You said that "all the
> spam saved on /spam has only the header". I was just comparing the
> amounts. For me, about 1/4 of these kinds of emails are without body
> and 3/4 contain bodies. I started to get these kin
18 matches
Mail list logo
