>Will you share your magic BackscatterPreventionSystem with us fritz ?
My motivation for sharing has continuously decreased. Maybe you start
a discussion about the lizenze which is covering all of my work - that
may help to increase it again.
>> What types of legitimate messages use null sender? Is it only DSN type
>> messages? Someone else (Marrco?) said that Return receipts & vacation
>> messages(?) do this (I don't think a proper vacation autoresponder does
>> - I'll have to look at one of ours)? What about things like meeting
>
> What types of legitimate messages use null sender? Is it only DSN type
> messages? Someone else (Marrco?) said that Return receipts & vacation
> messages(?) do this (I don't think a proper vacation autoresponder does
> - I'll have to look at one of ours)? What about things like meeting
> req
On 9/15/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Please point out the language that says I MUST ACCEPT one with a
>> null sender...
> It doesn't really exist in any standards track rfc - it is just the
> way the protocol has been interpreted over the years.
>
> Now that is changing
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Hi Josef,
>
>we found these bodyless mails some days ago in our spam-folders
>aswell.
>As long as it happens with Spam only it seems to get cutted caused by
>the termination of communication.
>Check your RegEx config.
>
>
>Mit
On 14 Sep 2007 at 17:13, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Please point out the language that says I MUST ACCEPT one with a null
> sender...
It doesn't really exist in any standards track rfc - it is just the way the
protocol has
been interpreted over the years.
Now that is changing with the backscatte
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
schreibt:
>Is there a way to block these out, without blocking out legitimate
>undelivered reports from mailservers? (or do my users have to just put
>up with it!!)
There are quite some tools built into ASSP to fight this type of spam.
