William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 20:31 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>
>> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:30 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>
That said I can't do that easily on multiple mail servers. Much less
>
Hi,
There are some way to run assp with priority 0 or less? I dont like it
running with -20, and every time it is rebooted I have to renice the pid.
Thanks,
André.
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new
Hi,
There are some way to save maillog.log in /var/log ? I Tried fill ASSP
Logfile with /var/log/maillog.log but nothing.
Thanks,
André.
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's t
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 20:31 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:30 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> >
> >> That said I can't do that easily on multiple mail servers. Much less
> >> reverse if I have problems. I work via automated too
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 18:39 -0800, Kevin wrote:
>
> Write the code to support absolute paths, test it on win32, BSD ,OS X ,
> and Linux and we'll gladly integrate it.
If I start writing anything it will be in either Java or C. Not to
mention if I did write it, I would be submitting a patch. Which
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:30 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>
>> That said I can't do that easily on multiple mail servers. Much less
>> reverse if I have problems. I work via automated tools like that,
>> package management stuff. Not by copying/replacing fi
hahahahaha
>This thread got a bit more out of hand that i expected, i should know
>better than to poke the hive with a stick...*sigh*
hahahahaha
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I know rpmforge has some of the perl modules, if you ask kindly
>> their maintainers there is a good chance the missinng modules will
>> be available. I'd be also interested in this because I will upgrade
>> our MX from EL4 to EL5. Rainer
>
> It's done, all but perl-mail
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Kevin wrote:
>> Archives for one.
>
> If you'd be reading archives wouldn't you have access to the whole
> thread to begin with?
Not always, I've had instanced where the archive was missing messages or
was completely unusable with thousands of messages and their threads
Im still learning:
NDRs come in without a sender or all the other header fields?
just <> ?
Kevin-107 wrote:
>
> bytehd wrote:
>> Strange because I have NDRs turned off in Exchange.
>
> Other people can still send you NDRs, turning them off only means you
> don't send them out.
>
> Kevin
>
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:30 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>> That said I can't do that easily on multiple mail servers. Much
>> less reverse if I have problems. I work via automated tools like
>> that, package management stuff. Not by copying/replacing files l
bytehd wrote:
> Strange because I have NDRs turned off in Exchange.
Other people can still send you NDRs, turning them off only means you
don't send them out.
Kevin
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new Source
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:30 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>
> That said I can't do that easily on multiple mail servers. Much less
> reverse if I have problems. I work via automated tools like that,
> package management stuff. Not by copying/replacing files like that. To
> much of a pita.
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 23:20 +0100, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> >Awaiting some sort of zip file or package of 1.3.5, and I will happily
> >package and test that on Gentoo.
>
> People who want to run the development version load them since years
> from my site.
Well since you took over development of
>Awaiting some sort of zip file or package of 1.3.5, and I will happily
>package and test that on Gentoo.
People who want to run the development version load them since years
from my site.
fritz
-
SF.Net email is sponsor
I have a single IP atm listed in noPB. Yet that IP keeps ending up in
the penalty box :( 1.3.3.8. Pretty 100% a bug, keep running into this
allot with one client in particular. Mighty annoying for them and me.
Awaiting some sort of zip file or package of 1.3.5, and I will happily
package and test
>
>I'm getting segmentation faults. Roughly every 30 mins, but it's not
>crashing regularly and I think it is triggered by an email event, but
>I'm not sure. I was running 1.3.3.8 but upgraded to 1.3.5; still
>getting the same issue. Running in console mode, I get this:
Mostly caused by a mail
Hi,
I'm getting segmentation faults. Roughly every 30 mins, but it's not
crashing regularly and I think it is triggered by an email event, but
I'm not sure. I was running 1.3.3.8 but upgraded to 1.3.5; still
getting the same issue. Running in console mode, I get this:
Dec-6-07 17:49:25 Commencing
Ah Jeroen,
I fear that we differ massively --- I get extremely irritated by bottom
content --- I want to see what new has been said. Interleaved is
excellent, bottom posted simply makes one scroll through and past crud one
has already read. I think your request should be carefully considered,
Strange because I have NDRs turned off in Exchange.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Messages-from-nobody-tf4957110.html#a14199742
Sent from the assp-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
SF.Net
Hi,
I have now read a ways to integrate asp with postfix, looking just at what I
found at asspsmtp.org's pages I see the following:
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Postfix
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/HOWTOS#Postfix (Which has two options)
Is the last url (specifically the correction at the bottom
Kevin wrote:
> Archives for one.
If you'd be reading archives wouldn't you have access to the whole
thread to begin with?
> Also because some people DO want to see the whole message, especially
> with technical discussions.
And some people don't.
> I would rather have more information that I
>I know rpmforge has some of the perl modules, if you ask kindly their
>maintainers there is a good chance the missinng modules will be
>available. I'd be also interested in this because I will upgrade our MX
>from EL4 to EL5.
>
>Rainer
It's done, all but perl-mail-srs was there and he added it an
b> Should I worry about these?
b> Can not tell who they are from...
No.. it's null sender - a bounce message.
Matti
--
Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh
Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau
+49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29
http://www.haack-it.de
On 12/6/2007, bytehd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Should I worry about these?
> Can not tell who they are from...
>
> Dec-6-07 11:34:26 8866c16936 64.83.1.89 <> Message proxied without
> processing: Size 162095 >
> 10
> Dec-6-07 11:34:26 [Noprocessing] 8866c16936 64.83.1.89 <
Should I worry about these?
Can not tell who they are from...
Dec-6-07 11:34:26 8866c16936 64.83.1.89 <> Message proxied without
processing: Size 162095 >
10
Dec-6-07 11:34:26 [Noprocessing] 8866c16936 64.83.1.89 <> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message
proxied wit
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:41 +0100, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>
> Version 1.3.5 is running fine and it would be great if you would try
> it. 1.3.5 fixed all reported bugs and may well fix your reported
> problem. I am running 1.3.5 in a large commercial production site.
Is this version packaged anyw
Hello,
I have a problem combining the assp SPAM proxy installation with an exchange
back-up / fall-back solution and hope someone can help me.
I used to have the following situation:
I have 2 exchange email servers at different locations and different
domain-names set-up so that if one falls-ou
28 matches
Mail list logo
