Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
> So you are saying you have bad (memory leaking) software installed on
> this box? I see no other reason to reboot otherwise. I say this as a
> Windows-type server and network administrator since NT 3.1.
>
Maybe he just likes that clean and fresh feeling after a re
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to add a range of IP addresses to the "Don't do Black Box
> for these IPs*" field in "Penalty Box". Is it possible to add a range
> like this 60.70.80., meaning the 60.70.80.0/24 range?
>
> Also does penalty works well? Anybody have any good or b
So you are saying you have bad (memory leaking) software installed on
this box? I see no other reason to reboot otherwise. I say this as a
Windows-type server and network administrator since NT 3.1.
Jay Tarbox wrote:
Because it's doing a hell of a lot of misc stuff and it's a windows box
--
Because it's doing a hell of a lot of misc stuff and it's a windows box
--
Regards,
Jay
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Tarbox
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:20 AM
> To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP
John Shaw-Miller wrote:
> I currently use EXIM as a smart host in this type of configuration
> -- depending on domain
> @coreoperations.co.uk -- deliver to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
On the exim list they would send you this link:
http://wiki.exim.org/DontObfuscate
I see no point obfuscati
Hello,
I would like to add a range of IP addresses to the "Don't do Black Box
for these IPs*" field in "Penalty Box". Is it possible to add a range
like this 60.70.80., meaning the 60.70.80.0/24 range?
Also does penalty works well? Anybody have any good or bad experiences?
Thanks,
Jeroen
shacky wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am getting the following error when my mail server on which ASSP is
> installed receives an e-mail message which have a local e-mail address
> as sender:
>
> 554 5.7.1 Sender Unknown in Local Domain . (in reply to MAIL FROM command))
>
> I cannot understand what configu
MD,
Just want to point out that using the catchall setting will result in senders
not realizing they are sending to an invalid address and repeatedly sending to
wrong addresses. Senders will be under the impression your organization is
just not good about communicating with them since they ass
On 2/14/2008, Jay Tarbox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Been using since the early days, but I reboot that server every night.
? Why??
--
Best regards,
Charles
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challen
ASSP Proxy Uptime: 0.420 days 1541.889 days
Messages Processed: 359 (854.4 per day) 1394067 (904.1 per day)
Non-Local Mail Blocked: 68.2% 75.4%
CPU Usage: 0.60% (0.71% avg)2.07% avg
Concurrent SMTP Sessions: 0 (5 max) 1007 max
Been using since the early days
Hi!
I am getting the following error when my mail server on which ASSP is
installed receives an e-mail message which have a local e-mail address
as sender:
554 5.7.1 Sender Unknown in Local Domain . (in reply to MAIL FROM command))
I cannot understand what configuration I have to change in the A
Hi All,
I currently use EXIM as a smart host in this type of configuration
-- depending on domain
@coreoperations.co.uk -- deliver to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
@anotherdomain.com -- local delivery
@yetanotherdomain.com -- deliver to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
@yetagainanotherd
Didn't want to start a war here, but
ASSP Proxy Uptime: 1.021 days 168.954 days
Messages Processed: 6191 (6064.4 per day) 556900 (3296.2 per day)
Non-Local Mail Blocked: 99.0% 98.5%
CPU Usage:
Upgrading to the latest clamav fixed it.
From: Dickson, Paul
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:17 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: File::Scan::ClamAV
That module is sucking 80~99% CPU on 1.3.5. Anyone else seen this?
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
