Dickson, Paul wrote:
> could possibly know what is best for your environment. The only
> recommendation I have is not to use Bayesian.
I consider bayesian filtering a very important and effective way to
filter spam. It's also adaptable and you can train it. It doesn't seem
to hog the cpu at all
Solved.
second port not needed.
MTA does all the work
Duh
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Howto-Allow-external-users-to-relay-tp16002940p16005192.html
Sent from the assp-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
On 3/12/2008 10:10 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> You need to look at each section, then look up what they do and how
>> they work, then determine that for your self. I don't think anyone
>> here could possibly know what is best for your environment. The
>> only recommendation I have is not to use B
Does this require any settings in the Validate Sender or Validate Local
Addresses section
other than my @domain.com in LocalAddresses_Flat?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Howto-Allow-external-users-to-relay-tp16002940p16004601.html
Sent from the assp-user mailing list a
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
However a very basic approach would be to use
-- greylisting/delaying
-- dnsbl with maxhit =2
Would that "basic" recommendation be with or without Bayesian?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
listenport2 = 587
smtpauthServer=192.168.1.125:125 (same as primary)
enforceAuth = 1
Tell the user to use port 587 and password auth.
Their other auth choice is ntlm, but i dont think ntlm goes over the
internet, right?
plus open router ports.
Is this all i need?
--
View this message in context
>You need to look at each section, then look up what they do and how
>they
>work, then determine that for your self. I don't think anyone here
>could possibly know what is best for your environment. The only
>recommendation I have is not to use Bayesian.
That would be unwise. In ASSPs scoring
You need to look at each section, then look up what they do and how they
work, then determine that for your self. I don't think anyone here
could possibly know what is best for your environment. The only
recommendation I have is not to use Bayesian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi all !
Witch features I need to enable in assp to have a basic (medium)
antispam filtering ?
I have many clients (with mailing lists and commercial mail) and they
are very lazy to update his whitelists.
We can accept a certain level of spam as normally.
Thanks
Roberto
--
Ing. Roberto Per
