[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My mum told me there was no such thing as a stupid question, just stupid
> answers.
No need to start insulting people. If you disagree with something it is
more helpful (and kind) to point out what you disagree with and add some
counter arguments as to why you disagre
http://www.ldapbrowser.com would be useful for you to make absolutely sure
you're getting it right
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Campbell
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 1:56 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user]
ASSP 1.3.9.1
ActiveState Perl 5.8.8
Windows 2003 DC
Dell PowerEdge 2900
I've setup ASSP to validate recipients by LDAP, Active Directory.
Problem 1: LDAP bind error: 49 -- check ignored
I've copied the filters from www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/LDAP and typed in the
credentials and search base, "ou=Empl
I am still having some troubles with mail from a vendor for one domain.
Does the following mean the mail was blocked?
Aug-18-08 14:41:16 209.5.242.66 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ClamAV: scanning
113786 bytes done OK
Aug-18-08 14:41:18 [Bayesian] 209.5.242.66 <[EMA
please run assp.pl in command line mode
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Command_line_mode
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK
@daniel:
This is the perl version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for i686-linux
I haven't upgraded it by myself, but AFAIK that's a good build. These are
the module versions as shown by the maillog just after a restart:
>> -Original Message-
>> Hmm, my freshclam.log says:
>> ERROR: daemonize() failed
> I'm not sure which freshclam version you are running, but
> there have been persistent reports that in 0.93.x versions
> ported to Windows, the --daemon (or -d) parameter
> does not always work correctly
