I'm wary of anything like this that comes up empty in a Google search.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GrayHat
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:17 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] The "BOFH" DNSBL
not sure it'
Me too!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melvin
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:13 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Perl 100% cpu usage
CRNET wrote:
> Hi Isaak,
>
> this pr
CRNET wrote:
> Hi Isaak,
>
> this problem appears, when large mails pass ASSP or a high number of
> open connections. In the same way perl.exe needs more and more RAM.
> With my Windows-Servers it was the same. (over 30 k Messages a day)
> The only solution to run ASSP on a Windows-Server was to in
Hi Isaak,
this problem appears, when large mails pass ASSP or a high number of
open connections. In the same way perl.exe needs more and more RAM.
With my Windows-Servers it was the same. (over 30 k Messages a day)
The only solution to run ASSP on a Windows-Server was to install
VMWare Server on t
not sure it's something ready for "prime time", yet it may be worth a
spin
I'm referring to http://www.bbfh.org/ the two lists "l1" and "l2" seem
rather
promising, I'm experimenting with the l2 on a test machine; if someone
feels brave enough and has a test box around, try one of those lists too
so
