Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

2008-12-02 Thread Melvin
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt: > >> Hmm, was that an intentional change in functionality? Older versions >> didn't work that way as far as I can tell. >> > > No, it was not. It was a bug. Already patched and confirmed corrected > by Joseph. > As always, 2 steps ah

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

2008-12-02 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt: >Hmm, was that an intentional change in functionality? Older versions >didn't work that way as far as I can tell. No, it was not. It was a bug. Already patched and confirmed corrected by Joseph. ---

Re: [Assp-user] Whitelist and Greylisting

2008-12-02 Thread Melvin
Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Is it shown in log as whitelisted? >> > > What finally worked for the ca.example.com sender was modifying the > whitelistedDomains > file with *example.com from example.com. > > I assumed that example.com matched everything possible forward, but I guess > not. Now

Re: [Assp-user] Feature Request: Attachment stripping - WAS: Re: Random problem w

2008-12-02 Thread Howard Fleming
>> I'm not advocating any one product or another here, and can't really >> speak for other mail server products, but when you say >> "about 80%+ - of storage is from DUPLICATE large attachments." >> >> In Exchange, the message store only contains one copy of an identical >> file and that single co

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.4.3.1 released on SF

2008-12-02 Thread GrayHat
> But that is already done in the provided script. > http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/S065335E5?WasRead=1 Yes and... no :) not willing to "troll" but is some cases the script bombs with errors due to "unable to..." and I found the solution myself while installing the modules, tha

[Assp-user] ASSP v1.2.6 to 2.0.0.x

2008-12-02 Thread Spyros Tsiolis
Also, Does anyone know if I can migrate (keep existing bayesian data) from v1.2.6 to 2.0.0.x ? cheers, s. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux base

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP upgrade time. Don't know what to chose.

2008-12-02 Thread Đức Nguyễn Anh
If you have to handle a large of mails (100K+/day) I think 2.0 it's better :) On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Spyros Tsiolis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello again list, > > OK, time has come to start upgrading ASSP on three mail servers. > > Should I go with 1.4.3.1 or 2.0.0.x ? > > I want to

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.4.3.1 released on SF

2008-12-02 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
GrayHat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreibt: >I know, it's tricky, and I was planning to create a small >batch script for windows to automate the task, but ... well, >didn't find the time yet (since I'll need to fire up a fresh >VM and proceed as above to find out which repos have >the needed modules and

[Assp-user] ASSP upgrade time. Don't know what to chose.

2008-12-02 Thread Spyros Tsiolis
Hello again list, OK, time has come to start upgrading ASSP on three mail servers. Should I go with 1.4.3.1 or 2.0.0.x ? I want to go 2.0.0.x and get on with it. Any ideas ? Regards, .s - This SF.Net email is s