Re: [Assp-user] FilesDistribution

2009-04-29 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Please use the newest 1.5.1.2 version, I changed the FilesDistribution = 1 calculus so, that this will not happen again. -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Medi

Re: [Assp-user] problem with v.1.5.1.2 (1.1.10)

2009-04-29 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
For Users of ASSP schreibt: >Today I replaced assp.pl with the new one (1.1.10). Please read the remark on top of the site: If you want to run this version you should join assp-t...@lists.sourceforge.net. To do that, mail to assp-test-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net with "subscribe" in body.

Re: [Assp-user] problem with v.1.5.1.2 (1.1.10)

2009-04-29 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
For Users of ASSP schreibt: > >While it was running fine just before upgrade. What happens if you run 1.0.7 again. -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media.

[Assp-user] problem with v.1.5.1.2 (1.1.10)

2009-04-29 Thread Hisham
Today I replaced assp.pl with the new one (1.1.10). My old file was running (1.0.0.7). After upgrade, when sending to s...@assp.local to report spam email, i get below bounced back: Failed to deliver to 's...@assp.local' mail loop: too many hops (too many 'Received:' header fields) While it was

[Assp-user] FilesDistribution

2009-04-29 Thread Graziano
Hello which is the correct FilesDistribution value to avoid a situation like this Apr-25-09 16:12:30 27.18.20.14 to: b...@bo.com [spam found] (MessageScore 70, limit 46) [SALE] -> /usr/local/assp/spam/924.eml; Apr-25-09 17:05:00 189.131.19.24 to: b...@bn.com [spam found] (MessageScore 63, lim