Re: [Assp-user] Need help

2010-06-22 Thread K Post
Is there a way for ASSp to log the username sent when smtp-auth is used? On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Grayhat wrote: > > > That ip is not Local to us, so why is assp thinking it is? > > stolen credentials > > > > --

Re: [Assp-user] Need help

2010-06-22 Thread Grayhat
> That ip is not Local to us, so why is assp thinking it is? stolen credentials -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit.

Re: [Assp-user] Need help

2010-06-22 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Do you use Relay Port (relayPort) ? Note that you'll want to keep the relayPort protected from external access by your firewall. In newer versions you can protect this with ->Allow Relay Connection from these IPs* (allowRelayCon) Enter any addresses that are allowed to use the relayPort , se

Re: [Assp-user] Need help

2010-06-22 Thread Robinson Mfg - Adam Campbell
smtp auth? they're using known credentials? adamc -Original Message- From: Phil Cook [mailto:ph...@grainsystems.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 1:48 PM To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-user] Need help I have someone who is relaying thru my server and for the life of

[Assp-user] Need help

2010-06-22 Thread Phil Cook
I have someone who is relaying thru my server and for the life of me I can't figure out how. Here is the log line: Jun-14-10 07:06:08 17138-11328 [Local] 93.174.88.178 to: engleesq0...@aol.com local -- -- [Your craiglist account is temporarily suspended] -> ./notspam/11328.eml That ip is no

Re: [Assp-user] Is this address really invalid?

2010-06-22 Thread James Moe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/2010 07:01 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > > For Users of ASSP writes: I am posting this again since there is a problem with ASSP v1.7.5.5 that causes the Subject to disappear. >>> >>> How do you know that? >>> >> That is how I rec

Re: [Assp-user] Is this address really invalid?

2010-06-22 Thread James Moe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/2010 06:18 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > > I changed that for 1.7.5.5 (1.0.03). > The development version has also changed since some days. > Please try 1.7.5.6 (0.0.09) > http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/S06E7457E?WasRead=1 >

Re: [Assp-user] Is this address really invalid?

2010-06-22 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
For Users of ASSP writes: >>> I am posting this again since there is a problem with ASSP v1.7.5.5 >>> that causes the Subject to disappear. >> >> How do you know that? >> > That is how I receive them. sigh. -- Thi

Re: [Assp-user] Is this address really invalid?

2010-06-22 Thread James Moe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/2010 06:13 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > >> I am posting this again since there is a problem with ASSP v1.7.5.5 >> that causes the Subject to disappear. > > How do you know that? > That is how I receive them. - -- James Moe jimoe at sohn

Re: [Assp-user] Is this address really invalid?

2010-06-22 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
I changed that for 1.7.5.5 (1.0.03). The development version has also changed since some days. Please try 1.7.5.6 (0.0.09) http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/S06E7457E?WasRead=1 -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's Gee

Re: [Assp-user] Is this address really invalid?

2010-06-22 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
For Users of ASSP writes: > I am posting this again since there is a problem with ASSP v1.7.5.5 >that causes the Subject to disappear. How do you know that? -- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate

[Assp-user] Is this address really invalid?

2010-06-22 Thread James Moe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I am posting this again since there is a problem with ASSP v1.7.5.5 that causes the Subject to disappear. ASSP v1.7.5.5 (and now v1.6.5.4). Thunderbird 3.0.? writes a history address book of some sort that records addresses selected from