Re: [Assp-user] spamLovers is missconfigred

2010-07-27 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > For Users of ASSP schreibt: >> >> I can edit the file with the button next to spamLovers in the web >> interface > > Is the file empty? Write a comment into the first line and save.May be > that help. I tried that. I tried with just a co

Re: [Assp-user] assp version check download failed

2010-07-27 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:17 AM, Mark Edwards wrote: > I'm seeing this in the logs regularly: > > Jun-09-10 02:07:52 [Worker_1] Downloading assp version check via direct > HTTP connection > Jun-09-10 02:07:52 [Worker_1] AdminInfo: assp version check download > failed: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found

Re: [Assp-user] spamLovers is missconfigred

2010-07-27 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
For Users of ASSP schreibt: > >I can edit the file with the button next to spamLovers in the web >interface Is the file empty? Write a comment into the first line and save.May be that help. -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Pro

[Assp-user] spamLovers is missconfigred

2010-07-27 Thread Mark Edwards
I'm trying to enable the ability to tag spamlovers via the email interface. I have this configuration: EmailSpamLoverAdd: spamlover spamLovers: file:files/spamlovers.txt I can edit the file with the button next to spamLovers in the web interface, no problem. However, when I send an address to

Re: [Assp-user] assp version check download failed

2010-07-27 Thread Spyros Tsiolis
--- On Tue, 27/7/10, Mark Edwards wrote: > From: Mark Edwards > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] assp version check download failed > To: "For Users of ASSP" > Date: Tuesday, 27 July, 2010, 10:18 > > On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Spyros Tsiolis > mailto:sts...@yahoo.co.uk>> > wrote: > > --- On Mon,

Re: [Assp-user] Whitlising based on attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
In ASSP V1 (1.7.5.7 - 0.0.12) there is -Passing File Extensions (PassAttach) This regular expression is used to identify attachments that should mark the message as noprocessing. Separate entries with a pipe |. The dot . is assumed to precede these, so don't include it. http://www.magicvillage.

Re: [Assp-user] assp version check download failed

2010-07-27 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Spyros Tsiolis mailto:sts...@yahoo.co.uk>> wrote: --- On Mon, 26/7/10, Mark Edwards mailto:medwa...@thecjm.org>> wrote: From: Mark Edwards mailto:medwa...@thecjm.org>> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] assp version check download failed To: "For Users of ASSP" mailto:assp-

Re: [Assp-user] Whitlising based on attachment

2010-07-27 Thread Yossi Shteingart
Hi, Thank you for responding. I know it sounds crazy but the attachment is being validated by our application. We host a platform that translate e-mail messages to other message types. We have an end user application the attach a validation attachment to the message so we know it is valid. To av