Dale schreibt:
>Hi Fritz
>
>Ideally, I do want tagging, I just want to have messages that are
>over a
>certain threshold deleted.
>
>Is there a way to do this?
Set DoPenaltyMessage to "block" and set PenaltyMessageLimit to that
threshold.
-
Hi Phil
I can't seem to find Set message Warning Tag (MessageScoringWarningTag)
In TestModes I have Prepend Spam Subject which I have [POSSIBLE SPAM]
I can't wait to smile when the emails and calls stop
Believe me, that will be a nice silence
:)
Thanks
Dale
- Original Message -
Fro
Dale,
Set Message Scoring (DoPenaltyMessage) back to "Block".
Set MessageScoring Lower Limit (MessageScoringLowerLimit) to the scoring
threshold over which you want messages to be tagged. For example: 39.
Set MessageScoring Upper Limit (MessageScoringUpperLimit) to the scoring
threshold over wh
I was wondering if it is possible to configure ASSP to filter on a
specific "Received:" header. I currently am getting the occasional spam
that's sent through html injection from freemail providers such as yahoo
and hotmail. The first "Received:" often contains IPs I block, such as
in the 41/8
Hi Fritz
Ideally, I do want tagging, I just want to have messages that are over a
certain threshold deleted.
Is there a way to do this?
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Fritz Borgstedt"
To: "For Users of ASSP"
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Message
Dale schreibt:
>X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit[tagging]
Ok, you have set DoPenaltyMessage to "tagging" and ASSP is doing what
you want. Set it to block if you want ASSP to block it.
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel
Hi Fritz
There is no X-Assp-Block
Here's the rest of the header
Received: from smtp2c.orange.fr ([80.12.242.155] helo=smtp2c.orange.fr) by
server.synergyspamfiltering.com with ESMTP (2.0.2); 23 Aug 2010
01:29:01 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf2c23.orange
Dale schreibt:
>X-Assp-Spam: YES
>X-Spam-Status:yes
>X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore 55, limit 53
>X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 55
>
>The high limit is 53, total score is 55, and it was sent through
I do not think that these are the complete assp-headers. I am missing
at least the "X-Assp-Block:
Hi
Is this a better example
X-Assp-Spam: YES
X-Spam-Status:yes
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore 55, limit 53
X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 55
The high limit is 53, total score is 55, and it was sent through
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Fritz Borgstedt"
To: "For Users of ASSP"
Se
Without an example it is impossible to discuss this.
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(TM) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users
worldwide. Take advan
Hi Fritz
All Test Mode ON (allTestMode) is Unchecked
Bayesian Test Mode (baysTestMode) is Checked
Prepend Spam Tag (spamTag) is Checked
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Fritz Borgstedt"
To: "For Users of ASSP"
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Message
Dale schreibt:
>I had emails over the high threshold get tagged but, is that because
>my
>Message Scoring Mode setting is set to "Tagging"
Please show an example from the log. Are you sure that testmode is not
set?
-
Hi Phil
I have the same issue, when you figure that out, please let me know your
solution.
:)
Thanks
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Quesinberry"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Message Scoring Mode
>
> Ok, correction on the message id...
Hi Phil
I had emails over the high threshold get tagged but, is that because my
Message Scoring Mode setting is set to "Tagging"
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Quesinberry"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 9:45 AM
Subject: [Assp-user] Message Scoring Mode
>
> Hi Dale,
>
>
DoNoSpoofing has already been set to block in my case. I was referring to
future blocking of messages from the same IP, hence the suggested increase
in flValencePB. In my opinion the default score of 20 points is far too
lenient, IPs that attempt spoofing should be blacklisted quickly.
I also en
Hi Phil
I apologize for not replying over the past few days, my computer time was
limited do to a family emergency.
I will reply this morning to your emails.
Thank you for your help
Dale
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Quesinberry"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:24 AM
Subje
Sorry - when I create an account in outlook they use "secure password
authentication"
Kind Regards,
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marcus [mailto:cmar...@media-brokers.com]
Sent: 23 August 2010 14:44
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Some Spam coming th
ph...@qsystemsengineering.com schreibt:
>And Fritz... good point. Is there another way to accomplish future
>blocking
>from those IPs other than setting flValencePB to a value higher than
>PenaltyLimit or PenaltyExtreme?
DoNoSpoofing can be set to blocking instead of scoring (standard for
all fil
Shane Killian wrote:
> I don't think they currently authenticate on outbound mails.
So you're an open relay???
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter
Sorry for the blank post earlier - I failed to include the subject.
And Fritz... good point. Is there another way to accomplish future blocking
from those IPs other than setting flValencePB to a value higher than
PenaltyLimit or PenaltyExtreme?
Thanks,
- Phil
--
Re: [Assp-user
I don't think they currently authenticate on outbound mails.
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: 23 August 2010 13:47
To: For Users of ASSP
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Some Spam coming through
For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>Thanks for that
>
>
>Will this a
ph...@qsystemsengineering.com schreibt:
>It's a safe bet that you won't see any legitimate mail coming from an
>IP
>trying to spoof a local domain address.
You should then outright block it.
--
This SF.net email is spon
For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>Thanks for that
>
>
>Will this affect users in remote locations e.g. Users in another
>country using out companies SMTP server through ASSP?
No. Those user should use SMTP AUTH.
--
This SF
For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>I have some users still receiving spam like the one below.
>How can I be more strict on this?
>
>I notice that the from address is the same as the too address.
set DoNoSpoofing to block
put Pfizer into bombSubjectRe
-
Also be certain that your ASSP relay port (relayPort) is firewalled off from
the Internet, if you're using one.
In addition to this, you may want to set Invalid Local Sender Score
(flValencePB) to a higher number, I set it to 75. This will add to the
penalty score for that IP and get it to the "e
Thanks for that
Will this affect users in remote locations e.g. Users in another country using
out companies SMTP server through ASSP?
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: 23 August 2010 13:19
To: Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subj
>I have some users still receiving spam like the one below.
>How can I be more strict on this?
>
>I notice that the from address is the same as the too address.
DoNoSpoofing set to Block will prevent external senders from having
a domain the same as one of your local domains.
I moved to ASSP 1.7.5.7(1.0.06) and rebuildspamdb 2.7.5.8(1.0.02) and
ever since, my block report has only come in as text. My email client is
set to read those in HTML format, and the ASSP setting should be sending
in both text and HTML format.
Also, for a while I've had problems with the repl
Hello list,
Does anyone know which Perl version is preferable for the latest
ASSP releases ? (e.g. v1.7.5.7).
TIA,
s.
"I merely function as a channel that filters
music through the chaos of noise"
- Vangelis
--
Hi,
I have some users still receiving spam like the one below.
How can I be more strict on this?
I notice that the from address is the same as the too address.
Thanks ,
Shane
-Original Message-
From: my_internal_u...@mydomain.com
Sent: 22 August 2010 05:30
To: my_internal_u...@mydom
30 matches
Mail list logo
