Re: [Assp-user] Problems with BombRe after upgraded to 2.4.3(14349)

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel Da Luz
Daniel Miller, I'm using the BombDataRe instead and it is doing well til now. Regards, Daniel Da Luz - Original Message - From: "Mr. Courtney Creighton" To: "For Users of ASSP" Sent: Quarta-feira, 11 de Fevereiro de 2015 21:46:58 Subject: Re: [Assp-u

Re: [Assp-user] Problems with BombRe after upgraded to 2.4.3(14349)

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel Da Luz
Hello, Mr. Courtney. I'm running the 14349. I already tried the option "!!!N-W-I-L-!!!" without quotes at the beginning of the file and still the same on both cases (Suspicious and BlackRe). Daniel Da Luz - Original Message - From: "Mr. Courtney Creighton&q

Re: [Assp-user] Problems with BombRe after upgraded to 2.4.3(14349)

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel Da Luz
egexps, you might as well add them to one of the Black lists. So I suggest turning down the PB value for bombSuspicious, and then sorting out your regexps between the various lists accordingly. -C Daniel Da Luz wrote on 2/6/2015 7:38 AM: > Hello, > > I'm having problems with th

Re: [Assp-user] Problems with BombRe after upgraded to 2.4.3(14349)

2015-02-06 Thread Daniel Da Luz
:02:37 [Worker_1] 187.0.209.202 to: u...@my.domain.tld info: message forwarded to assp.quarent...@my.domain.tld Thanks. Daniel. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Da Luz" To: "For Users of ASSP" Sent: Sexta-feira, 6 de Fevereiro de 2015 12:38:15 Subject:

[Assp-user] Problems with BombRe after upgraded to 2.4.3(14349)

2015-02-06 Thread Daniel Da Luz
Hello, I'm having problems with the whitelisted users are being blocked, no matter what we have on bombReWL, bombReNP, bombReLocal, bombReISPIP. Does anyone know how can I fix this? Best regards, Daniel. -- Dive in

Re: [Assp-user] Rebuildspam.pl

2014-10-30 Thread Daniel Da Luz
SPAM Email Interface Report. - Original Message - From: "Phil Cook" To: "For Users of ASSP" Sent: Quarta-feira, 29 de Outubro de 2014 11:13:41 Subject: [Assp-user] Rebuildspam.pl When rebuildspam.pl runs I'm seeing this in the report a bunch of times: removing C:/assp/spam/11783.eml -

Re: [Assp-user] Zimbra and ASSP Topology

2014-05-28 Thread Daniel Da Luz
Sorry about that. That was supposed to be a PM. Daniel. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Da Luz" To: "For Users of ASSP" Sent: Quarta-feira, 28 de Maio de 2014 10:26:21 Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Zimbra and ASSP Topology Fala, Alexandre.. Blz? Cara, te achei aq

Re: [Assp-user] Zimbra and ASSP Topology

2014-05-28 Thread Daniel Da Luz
Fala, Alexandre.. Blz? Cara, te achei aqui no Facebook. Qual teu telefone, pra trocarmos uma idéia? Valeu! Daniel Da Luz (85) 99281920 - Original Message - From: "Alexandre de Arruda Paes" To: "For Users of ASSP" Sent: Quarta-feira, 28 de Maio de 2014 8:02:16 Sub

Re: [Assp-user] Zimbra and ASSP Topology

2014-05-27 Thread Daniel Da Luz
gunda-feira, 26 de Maio de 2014 15:36:43 Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Zimbra and ASSP Topology Daniel Da Luz wrote: > So, if I got your point, should all trafic (local domains and external > domains) pass through ASSP? > Does ASSP needs to know the local domains traffic? The Zimbra has "Relay

Re: [Assp-user] Zimbra and ASSP Topology

2014-05-26 Thread Daniel Da Luz
The main reason I'm asking this is to know what is the best scenario to work with ASSP. I mean, do i need to leave all traffic (inbound internal, outbound internal, inbound external, outbound external domains) passing through ASSP? Thanks, Daniel Da Luz. - Original Message - Fr

[Assp-user] Zimbra and ASSP Topology

2014-05-23 Thread Daniel Da Luz
the recommended topology to use with ASSP? I appreciate any help. Regards, Daniel Da Luz -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests acros