Hi,
I'm planning to upgrade assp from 1.5.1.3 to 1.6.5.5. Do I need only to
replace assp.pl file ? Are there any issues I need to be aware of?
Please advice,
Thanks
HS
--
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides
> I don't know why they are using a local address in a helo, but I
> would either put the IP in 'noHelo' or put the helo into
> 'heloBlacklistIgnore'.
>
> The helos you want blocked will stay blocked.
>
In this case we will have to wait until they complain about it before we
know which address
Hi,
> >
> > The "invalid HELO" option is very useful when enabled to reject large
> amount
> > of spam, but unfortunately also rejects lots of legitimate mail ;-(
>
> You'll have to tell us what you have in your config and what gets
> blocked.
>
> The default setting blocks an IP address or a nam
your input.
Thanks,
Hisham
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core a
with fake envelope from).
>
> Have you checked the blocked IP with spamcop and found it isn't there?
>
>
>
>
> On 9/29/2009 10:33 AM, Hisham Al Saad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are running ASSP Version: 1.5.1.3(1.0.01). Sometimes ASSP rejects
> > mess
in advance.
Regards,
Hisham
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to
et=>2|l2.apews.org=>3|combined.njabl.org=>1|safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net=>1
"DNSBL Expiration Time (RBLCacheExp)" is set to 12 hours.
Any help to solve this issue please ?
Thanks
Hisham
--
Are you an open source
Hi,
I upgraded to ASSP 1.5.1.2(4.0.04). When i check a blocked message from
the block report, i see that the message listed in the report is not the
same message stored in the /discarded folder.
For example:
In the email report i receive, the below entry is listed:
May-14-09 05:43:13 [BombData
Thanks GrayHat,
I made most of the changes suggested below. Suppose the connections are
ligitimate, how can I know if the box can handle more connections.
I mean what can be the indicators that would show for example that the
server can handle 300 parallel connection. If we have an ASSP server pu
Hi,
Suddenly, when ever we send to any address on the email enterface (i.e.
block, spam, help,...etc) at the ASSP server we get below error.
Failed to deliver to 's...@assp.local'
mail loop: too many hops (too many 'Received:' header fields)
It used to work fine. I don't recall touching any set
Hi,
Since the recommended SMTP connections value is 64. I would like to know
from members on this list what is the maximum value you have set without
digrading performance...etc.
TIA
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanne
Thanks to all who offered to help , much appreciated :)
Brett sent me the required file version 1.5.1.2 (1.1.07). Thanks Brett
It was my mistake thinking 1.1.10 was the stable release !
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:42:13 +0200
"GrayHat" wrote:
>> If you're talking 1.5.12 (1.0.07), then I can help.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>> While it was running fine just before upgrade.
>
> What happens if you run 1.0.7 again.
Unfortunatly, I replaced the old assp.pl. From where i can redownload
1.0.7.
On the download site it always shows the latest release (1.1.10)!
Today I replaced assp.pl with the new one (1.1.10). My old file was
running (1.0.0.7). After upgrade, when sending to s...@assp.local to
report spam email, i get below bounced back:
Failed to deliver to 's...@assp.local'
mail loop: too many hops (too many 'Received:' header fields)
While it was
Hi all,
On the CPU Usage on the ASSP server it shows below line
CPU Usage: 99.32% (99.39% avg)
While on the command line #vmstat , it shows idle CPU utilization
between 92-100% (which means the real utilization reaches only 8% !)
[r...@mx1 logs]# vmstat
procs ---memory-- ---swap-
GrayHat wrote:
>> If i need to enable the VRFY option, all is needed is to add the list
>> of accounts (acco...@example.com) in the (LocalAddresses_Flat)
>> right ?
>
> uhm no :) you'll have to ensure that VRFY is enabled on the mailserver
> (or the mailservers) and then use a "special format"
GrayHat wrote:
> sounds like a plan :) ... also ensure that the delaying is enabled
> and that the recipient validation is correctly configured (either
> using LDAP or VRFY) those will help rejecting a whole lot of
> junk coming from spambots w/o affecting regular servers
>
If i need to enable t
Is it possible to enable LDAP accounts validation only to one local domain ?
TIA
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the Ja
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Please update to the upcoming 1.5.1.2:
>
> http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/S06660E7E?WasRead=1
>
Thanks,
I upgraded today following the instructions in the install.txt the
upgrade section. However since i'm upgrading from 1511 to 1512, I have
the file
Hi,
When first sending block request to bl...@assp.local i get the list of
emails been blocked by ASSP. And if i pick one email from the list to
get it back i send the email as instructed by the report to for example
(rsbmspam_-.-_2868@assp.local), instead of receiving the blocked
message
> well... I'd turn the HELO checks and the delaying "on"
>too; those won't
> cause trouble but will directly reject connections from
>a lot of
> spambots
> the same goes for blocked IPs and senderbase white/black
>listing
Thanks Grayhat,
I disabled testmode on all HELO checks as recommended and
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:37:39 +0200
"Fritz Borgstedt" wrote:
> You say, it is sufficient to set a limit very high, to
>allow all
> connections happen immediately.
> Quite funny if you ask me.
>
> The comment we put into the GUI reads : The maximum
>number of
> simultaneous SMTP sessions. This
Good morning all,
Few days back we put 2 ASSP servers in production in (testmode) except for
DNSBL not in testmode. And it started filtering out lots of SPAM. :). CPU
and Memory utilization was minimal.
I setup the Maximum Sessions (maxSMTPSessions) to 200 on each server and
also on the MTA se
On IP Blocking, try to disable :
Do Deny Connections from these IP's (DoDenySMTP)
Do Deny Connections from these IP's Strictly (DoDenySMTPstrict)
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> My worst nightmare has come true.
> After upgrading to a clients' place and being sure that everything is
Hi,
When i search the logs for an entry of a message, it's found but the
content of the message is some other message.
In the example below from logs, the content/subject of message 1636.eml
is not the same one in the logs !!
Apr-12-09 16:08:22 41698-01636 [MessageScore][testmode] 193.252.22.1
Thanks,
Do we need to copy spamdb file too ?
And in case of spam block report, the user has to send the message twice i
guess one message to each assp server to get the report from each?
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:33:20 -0600
Alex Davidson wrote:
> I specify all my settings to pull from files that
Since i'll be having 2 ASSP servers in round robin MX records. We'll be
using server 1 as admin point, send spam reports, generate spamdb ,...etc
What are the files/folders to be copied from server 1 to server 2 to
keep them both identical ? (i.e. assp.conf ) And what tools do you use
for the
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Did you set ReportLog to verbose?
>
Here is full log of block report request,
Apr-9-09 09:28:13 Connected: 193.188.97.110:36436 -> 193.188.97.210:25
-> 193.188.97.108:25
Apr-9-09 09:28:13 58493-10289 193.188.97.110 blocked
email report
Apr-9-09 09:28:13 Info: got bloc
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>> But why on the previous ASSP i just send a blank message and i get
>> the
>> report immediately?
>
>
> The format is different for users and admins.
> Admins are set by putting their address into
>
> - Admin Mail Address (EmailAdminRepor
Doug Lytle wrote:
> Hisham wrote:
>> If i resend the message with the requiested format in the body
>> acco...@example.com=>ad...@example.com i don't recieve the report even
>>
>
> The format is acc...@example.com=>ad...@example.com=>number_of_days
&g
I upgraded ASSP from 1.5.1.0(0.01) to 1.5.1.1(1.0.0.1). Before the
upgrade the spamblock report works fine.
Now after the upgrade if i send a blank message from my account to
(asspbl...@assp.local) i get below error:
Warning: possibly unsupported format in admin block request!
At least one line
ized Addresses* (EmailAdmins), I added
my local domains.
4- Tested by sending emails to asspbl...@assp.local and VIOLA, works
like a charm :)
Hisham wrote:
> Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
>> schreibt:
>>>
Thanks Jeroen, very interesting setup. I'll have to investigate how to
implement the same on my Communigate pro mailserver without forcing
users to change the connection port.
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> GrayHat wrote:
>>> For outbound as example :
>>>
>>> user -> mailserver -> ASSP -> same mailse
5910-11714 [ForgedHELO] 168.187.179.123
[spam found] (forced: forged Helo: 'x.com.
bh')
Thanks in Advance.
Hisham
--
___
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.s
GrayHat wrote:
>> For outbound as example :
>>
>> user -> mailserver -> ASSP -> same mailserver -> internet.
>>
>> Is this possible, won't this create email loops ?
>
> No, it isn't possible (not as you described it), and yes, that
> would create a mail loop, the config is the following
>
> user
Hi,
On one of the posts to this list, i remember reading something about
having the same smtp server to act as inbound/outbound point where on
the mailserver the smarthost will be the ASSP box.
For outbound as example : user -> mailserver -> ASSP -> same mailserver
-> internet.
Is this possibl
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>> now it says
>> "Unknown user account" :(
>
>
> who is "it" ? ASSP ?
The mailserver gives this "unknown account" when assp proxies the
message to it. It can not find "asspblock" account on the m
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
>
> Yep, how about putting assp.example.com in localDomains ?
>
I tried sending a message to e.g asspbl...@assp.example.com, now it says
"Unknown user account" :(
--
Apps built with the Adobe(R) F
GrayHat wrote:
>> But maybe you can set set up a route for one domain (like assp.local)
>> to the assp machine.
>
> or (better imVHo) use the DNS to solve the issue; let's say the
> mailserver
> domain is example.com, now, on the "local" DNS (the one used by the
> mailserver for resolution), add
GrayHat wrote:
>> Still it does not work :(
> [...]
>> Still all emails sent to asspbl...@example.com bounce back.
>
> you should send emails to asspbl...@assp.example.com and
> that "mapping" you made on the mailserver shouldn't be needed
> at all; assuming the assp.example.com domain is NOT def
GrayHat wrote:
> Yes, and it's documented too (even in the GUI) you'll need to use a
> different domain name, let me make an example, let's say your domain
> is example.com and let's also say your assp hostname is assp.domain.com
> now, just setup things so that the blockreport emails will be sent
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>> For local users how they can get blocked message if they wanted to
>> directly. ? Is it only if we enable outbound through assp ?
>
> You should be able to allow your users to send to the email-i
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
> schreibt:
>> In case of false positive email for some local user, how we can
>> resend
>> the message again to him/her ?
>
>
> This is possible in ASSP 1.5.1 and ASSP 2.0.0:
>
> - manage & resend spam & not
I've searched through the archives, unfortunately could not find a clear
answer to this question.
In case of false positive email for some local user, how we can resend
the message again to him/her ?
I'm not enabling (outbound) through assp yet, so my local users will not
be able to ask for re
Hi again :)
I see below 'delayed' entries in the log but then i don't see any log
updates about what happened next to this message. Any hints please why
it deos not show what happens next ?
Mar-16-09 13:22:08 122.165.50.151 to: xxx...@x.com
recipient delayed: xxx...@x.com
assp 1.4.
Hello,
I have a list of IP ranges to be whitelisted (globally). Is it enough
adding them to the ((Whitelisted IPs* (whiteListedIPs)), or they need
also to be added in other fields like ((Don't do DNSBL for these IPs*
(noRBL)) in the DNSBL settings as an example ?
Thanks,
H
pas...@dreissen.nl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you want it fancy you can use the WebGui of ASSP. The statistics
> port is afaik only for raw information which can be used in 3th party
> statistics programs, like cacti / rdd solutions!
>
Thanks for the clarification :)
Will it work straight away if i
oring | 0 | 0 Invalid Local Sender | 0 | 0 Invalid Internal Mail | 0 |
0 Scripts | 0 | 0 SPF Failures | 0 | 0 RBL Failures | 0 | 0 URIBL
Failures | 0 | 0 Max Errors Exceeded | 0 | 0 Delayed | 0 | 0 Empty
Recipient | 0 | 0 Not SRS Signed Bounces | 0 | 0
Thanks
H
Thanks, so i'll use ASSP 2.0 on the production machines.!
"Fritz Borgstedt" wrote:
> Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP
>Proxy
> schreibt:
>>I mean if i access the ASSP server via http on the admin
>>port i.e.
>>5, i did not notice a link to show the quara
s I'm asking if while i'm
playing with it. :)
Unfortunately my eyes could not pick an entry where i can view the ASSP
logs from the Webadmin :(
Kind regards,
Hisham
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC)
g too much.
Appreciate your support.
Kind regards,
Hisham
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategie
"GrayHat" wrote:
>
>> 1- We have around 100K users and 380 hosted email
>>domains,
>> is one ASSP server enough to handle the load for these
>> accounts to both filter SPAM and Virus infected emails
>>?.
>> A suggestion for server specs would be great !
>
> I'd better be using a c
Here is a reply I got earlier on similar question on
MySql, thanks to Grayhat and Jeroen,
> I am not exactly sure what the mysql backend is used for
to keep white/red lists, penalty box data and in general a
bunch of
infos
using a common mysql backend allows you to have a number
of ASSP
boxes
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> his...@sf.batelco.com.bh wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'll be asking many questions through out my
>> implementation phase of the ASSP, please bare with me
>>;-)
>
> You're gonna wake us all from hybernation. ;-|
LOL, I hope this is a good thing.
>
>> In my test setup,
Hi,
I'll be asking many questions through out my
implementation phase of the ASSP, please bare with me ;-)
In my test setup, i have a sepearte box running ASSP and
created a new domain on my SMTP server (eg mydomain.com).
The filter setup for this domain (mydomain.com) is
Internet - > ASSP - >
ight ?.
Thanks,
Hisham
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:55:25 +0100
"GrayHat" wrote:
>
>> I'd better be using a couple of ASSP 2.0 sharing a
>>common
>
> rethinking at the setup...
>
> let me make an example with one domain; let's say we
> have the example
i configure ASSP to filter outbound email sent
from our users ? and is it possible to set this up for
only speccific hosted domains ?
Thanks
Hisham
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San
57 matches
Mail list logo
