Re: [Assp-user] LocalAddresses

On 10/1/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you have to include the addresses for your mailing addresses in your > LocalAddresses file? > > Thanks, > > Evans Martin If LocalAddresses_Flat is set then yes you have to either put all the mailing addresses for your domain or set a globa

Re: [Assp-user] LocalAddresses

On 10/1/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I really should sleep before I write these messages. What I meant to say > was do you have to include the addresses for your list server addresses in > your LocalAddresses file? > Are these list servers you are running behind assp or are the

Re: [Assp-user] Problem with ASSP and Mail hub integration

replies in-line On 9/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13 Sep 2006 at 9:34, Farid Behnia wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We've been working on a specific setup for sendmail and ASSP. Our ideal > > setup is to run a sendmail mail hub that represents 3 sendmail servers in > > ou

Re: [Assp-user] Crash on strange header

On 9/8/06, Pascal Nobus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been running 2.1.4 now for a time without a problem, but since this > afternoon it has crashed many times (about a dozen) > > > This isn't the case with assp-1.0.12, because that's the version of on > of our backup-MX's (212.123.5.9) > So it

Re: [Assp-user] assp is blocking everything

On 9/7/06, Matti Haack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has this any impact on the function/speed of ASSP? > > Matti > I would say it adds the functionality of being able to keep track of the worse offending ips for possible additions to the denysmtp list. As for speed...I doubt it has any affect a

Re: [Assp-user] Everything flagged as Bayesian spam

On 9/9/06, Beach Computers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all. > > 2 days into implementing ASSP and running in test mode, 95% of mail still > gets flagged as Bayesian, including repeat mail that has manually been > dropped into the errors\notspam folder. > Any ideas are appreciated. Thats per

Re: [Assp-user] assp is blocking everything

On 9/7/06, Ernesto Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using version v1.2.4(0) > > Reject All But Whitelisted Mail is not checked. > > Yes I have setup the add spam, not spam, addresses as instructed and they > are being used. > > Here is a copy of my assp.cfg file. I did blank out some stuff.

Re: [Assp-user] Validate Sending Errors MX/A and unknown user err or

On 8/25/06, Carnes, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems like a pretty common configuration. I will just leave the > check off if this is the case. > You mean common mis-configuration. :) It's common for software to be half setup like that and be left alone afterwards for fear of breaking

Re: [Assp-user] Validate Sending Errors MX/A and unknown user err or

On 8/25/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MX/A check is part of Email::Valid package, this method accepts an > email address or domain name and determines whether a *valid* DNS > record (A or MX) exists for it. > > Ok, this makes sense then. The domain that the email is coming from

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP High CPU Usage

On 8/25/06, Goli, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We just recently upgraded our ASSP server from 1.1.0 to 1.2.4 as of > yesterday. We're seeing weird performance issues where it seems to be > taking a long time to process messages coming thru that have > attachements. > > This is running on an O

Re: [Assp-user] Validate Sending Errors MX/A and unknown user err or

On 8/25/06, brougham Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's nothing like i'm seeing- > > mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-1.southwest.com > mail.southwest.com MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail-2.southwest.com > > no mail03 at all > > Bro mail03.southwest.com (63.169.

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed!

On 8/24/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I don't see that in my diff of 1.2.3-> 1.2.4. > > > 5952,5953d5874 > < $skipLog=1 if ($this->{red}); > < $this->{red}=""; > > I see. Thank you for adding it. Kevin --

Re: [Assp-user] Notes button/file on Web interface?

On 8/24/06, brougham Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > What is the intended function for the Notes buttons and the files they open? > > Are they for notes of settings tried and a change log for users > > OR > > Is the project intending to fill them with more detailed config info, su

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed!

On 8/24/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > redlisted messages will not go to corpus > I don't see that in my diff of 1.2.3-> 1.2.4. I thought you said it was too complicated to do? Kevin - Using Tomcat but n

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed!

On 8/24/06, Fletcher Sandbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-08-24 at 14:32 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fletcher Sandbeck): > > >To be more specific, the ChangeLog in the ASSP documentation on source > >forge only goes up to version 1.1.0 released 2004-08-01. In the > >download archive the ChangeL

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP 1.2.4 Unleashed!

On 8/24/06, Fletcher Sandbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To be more specific, the ChangeLog in the ASSP documentation on source forge > only goes up to version 1.1.0 released 2004-08-01. In the download archive > the ChangeLog seems to only go up to version 1.0.10d released 2004-06-09. > >

Re: [Assp-user] CCallspam with BombRe

On 8/23/06, Jérôme PHILIPPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Micheal ! > > Yes it's a TrendMicro's problem or misconfig or RFC compatible ! > > For a good mail : > > *snip* > > and for a wrong mail : > > *snip* > > > For a wrong mail "DOT command received" is missing > > My config : > 3 servers

Re: [Assp-user] Changelog

On 8/23/06, Ged West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I apologize I meant to start this under a new thread. > > I am just wondering if someone already has or can provide a list of the > major changes between 1.2.0 and 1.2.4 I have attached the latest > changelog that I wias able to find. Maybe someo

Re: [Assp-user] Unallowed file

On 8/18/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >It is now corrected in (11). > > The following rules apply now: > > - '..' unallowed everywhere > > - Edit of files in ASSP directory OR upper directories allowed only > for > '.txt' and '.db' files. This to block accessing to other info a

Re: [Assp-user] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: Unallowed file

On 8/18/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matti Haack wrote: > > The only really clean & secure way (but as I think most > > complicated patch) would be allow access only to the files & locations which > > are entered somewhere in the config file. > > Best idea I have heard so fa

Re: [Assp-user] Unallowed file

On 8/18/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Do we need to be that restrictive? > > > > No, and we shouldn't be due to the customizable configuration of ASSP. > > > Also, I've just discovered that we need .db files in there. Currently you > > can't loo

Re: [Assp-user] 1.2.5(4) Interface Bug?

On 8/16/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I just installed 1.2.5(4) and noticed that all major headings show from > Network Setup to Attachment Control inclusive. They did eventually pop up > if I clicked down through each one but I would not have been able to go > directly to

Re: [Assp-user] SCL Header

On 8/16/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where can I go to download the revisions that you mention here? I only see > 1.2.3 on the SourceForge site. > Fritz keeps the betas on his site. http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/ Use at your own risk. Things sometimes break. Kevin ---

Re: [Assp-user] Its official - we are on Secunia...

On 8/16/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Przemek Czerkas wrote: > > So, the current cvs version - although not a recent one - > > is NOT affected ;-) > > Excellent observation! :-) It looks a fix is likely readily available, > but there is still the issue of the FreeBSD port...

Re: [Assp-user] Virus Scanning not working

On 8/16/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > geniusfreak wrote: > > There is a perl module for just this. "File::Scan::ClamAV". > > It allows you to pass a file/filestream(we would use a stream) to a > > clamd daemon running on the local

Re: [Assp-user] Its official - we are on Secunia...

On 8/16/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > schreibt: > > > >Note: I did *not* claim to discover the vulnerability - only that it > >has been known for some time and that I was aware of it. I did > >however > >post a det

Re: [Assp-user] Virus Scanning not working

On 8/16/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doug Traylor wrote: > > Adding a call to an optional external command line scanner/scanners of our > > choice like Declude and hMailServer do, after all the Spam checks, would be > > a great replacement for it. > > Unfortunately, I don't

Re: [Assp-user] Test

On 8/15/06, Aaron Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've gone through and installed all the other modules (except > sys::syslog) that are listed on that page. Would this have been what > caused it to crash? > Yes ASSP has been known to crash if not all the modules are installed. The syslog modul

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP security, adding to Gentoo Portage

you get when you run the assp.pl directly using "perl assp.pl" > I am not familiar with *nix or various ports for ASSP, so I cannot see > the logic in this, although Geniusfreak was telling me off-line that the > FreeBSD port deposits the log files in the same location as othe

Re: [Assp-user] Test

On 8/15/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Aaron Allen wrote: > > > Module Add-ons > > Compress::Zlib 1.41 CPAN > > Digest::MD5 2.36 CPAN > > Email::Valid CPAN > > File::ReadBackwards CPAN > > Mail::SPF::Query CPAN > > Mail::SRS CPAN > > Net::DNS 0.58 CPAN > > Net::L

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP security, adding to Gentoo Portage

On 8/15/06, Greg Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I would like to ask if someone could help me out with ASSP. I'm trying to > add it to Gentoo Portage (package management system) and just don't know > enough perl to figure this out. I've moved the directory structure to > Gentoo stan

Re: [Assp-user] If you ever need an example of why you MUST be careful when populating your black or bomb re's, this is it!

On 8/15/06, Dickson, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Enjoy☺, and yes, they actually exist. > > The top 10 unintentionally worst company internet addresses > > 2. Experts Exchange, a knowledge base where programmers can exchange > advice and views at www.expertsexchange.com *ahem for number 2 the

Re: [Assp-user] Heavy email load? ASSP can handle it!

On 8/11/06, Doug Traylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about 100,000 emails a day? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/msg107058.html > > > Doug > Yeah ASSP handles that and asks for more. I have one install that was handling over 1,000,000 messages per day. (1 domain,

Re: [Assp-user] blackre for non us telephone numbers.

or if you really want to block those country ip ranges. http://www.completewhois.com/statistics/data/ips-bycountry/rirstats/ also usefull http://www.hostip.info/index.html Kevin On 8/9/06, Dickson, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the list. If you want my copy of it with the . prea

Re: [Assp-user] Segmentation fault - beta 13 or bombRe?

If it's not too much trouble could you enable debug and when it crashes send in the last bit of the log file. It would be nice to know what is causing the segfault. I'll test them on my server later but i can't be sure i can reproduce it. Kevin On 8/9/06, James Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/8/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aug-8-06 22:10:41 68.52.149.101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> email whitelist addition > Aug-8-06 22:10:41 RMabort: rcpt Expected 250, got: 550 Sender is not > allowed. (from:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Thats probably caused because your mai

Re: [Assp-user] (13) is out and contains the modified Analyzer page

On 8/8/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > geniusfreak wrote: > Version: 6.0.2990.2180.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519 > how's THAT for a version number. :| > > In other words a full patched XP Pro SP2. > > I'm running the same version. No

Re: [Assp-user] (13) is out and contains the modified Analyzer page

On 8/8/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > geniusfreak wrote: > > This is on my test server. > > http://img74.imageshack.us/my.php?image=asspiecssissuesu7.jpg > > > > the image folder is the same one from 1.2.3 since there has not been > >

Re: [Assp-user] WhiteRE

On 8/8/06, Jérôme PHILIPPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > One suggestion. Is it possible to add the subject of the mails in the > maillog ? I think is a good thing to look the subject just to verify the > scan of assp. > > Jérôme. > You can use a combo of "UseSubjectsAsMaillogNames" & "fileLo

[Assp-user] Delaying and Bayesian test mode

Should ASSP delete the tuplet even though the bayesian was in test mode? - Aug-8-06 17:40:58 146.82.220.236 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whitelisting triplet: (146.82.220.0,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]) waited: 5m 3s Aug-8-06 17:40:58 146.82.220.236 <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Assp-user] (13) is out and contains the modified Analyzer page

On 8/8/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > geniusfreak wrote: > > It's a known IE css bug but it's a pain to work around. every time i > > fix it in IE it breaks in everything else. *sigh dammit MS > > can't you follow a simple standard

Re: [Assp-user] (13) is out and contains the modified Analyzer page

On 8/8/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > geniusfreak wrote: > > On a side note i'm working on fixing the css so it shows up in IE correctly. > > Cool beans, thanks! What isn't showing up properly? I thought I had > been watching out for t

Re: [Assp-user] (13) is out and contains the modified Analyzer page

On 8/8/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the result of the modified Analyzer page I have been working > on. Please give some constructive criticism about it: > good/bad/ugly/anything. I want to make things as easy to understand as > reasonably possible. > > Thanks! > >

Re: [Assp-user] Blocking UUENCODE revisited

On 8/8/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > geniusfreak wrote: > Why would we want to block this? > > ASSP doesn't recognize the attachment type, and can't block it. > > But, perhaps with my RE we can apply that to some new attachment bl

Re: [Assp-user] Blocking UUENCODE revisited

On 8/8/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this will do it: > > \bbegin\b \d\d\d \b\S{0,72}.*(\S{61}).{0,61}\bend\b > > It works good in my tests. Can anyone verify? > > Thanks! > > Why would we want to block this? -

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/8/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > schreibt: > >looking over the ASSP code it seems that 127.0.0.1 is what it sets the > >ip to when there is no connecting ip address and that happens when > >assp sends a message i

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Processing order

On 8/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8 Aug 2006 at 1:55, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > > > Fritz is definitely the one who knows. He's posted info about the order > > a couple of times in the past few months, but I cant recall if it was in > > the forums or on this list. > >

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/7/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Evans Martin wrote: > > I tried it and pointed it at one of my domains but it did not affect the > > issue. ASSP is still trying to send mail to 127.0.0.1. > > This makes sense to me now. smtpAuthServer does not have the same > dynamic f

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/7/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Evans Martin wrote: > > I tried it and pointed it at one of my domains but it did not affect the > > issue. ASSP is still trying to send mail to 127.0.0.1. > > This makes sense to me now. smtpAuthServer does not have the same > dynamic f

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/7/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My server has several internal IPs based upon which domain is making the > request. Which IP should I point it at? > > AHH the plot thickens. If you are binding your smtp servers to certain IPs are you sure there is one listening on 127.0.0

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/7/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > geniusfreak wrote: > > According to the description there is no difference in putting > > "__INBOUND__:125" or just "125". If that is indeed the case there > > there should be no difference

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/7/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. I am running ASSP on the same system that my mail server resides on. > Here's the version info from the web interface: > > ASSP v1.2.3(0) > Sun Aug 6 17:40:11 2006 > > And here is my config file: > > --snip-- > After glancing over it

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/7/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Evans Martin wrote: > > I think I'm running 1.2.3. How would I tell. I'm a total ASSP noob. The > description that you have written below exactly\ > The version is listed in two places. The bottom left of the web interface > (at th

[Assp-user] ASSP Processing order

I was browsing the ASSP documentation to see what should be copied over the wiki and updated and i can across an old processing order for ASSP. it is very out of date and is missing some of the key features like Delaying, RedListing and DNSRBL that the latest versions have. If anyone (especially F

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP site on Frappr

On 8/7/06, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7 Aug 2006 at 11:39, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > > > If you zoom in on Boston Massachusetts USA, you will see two places I am > > running ASSP in the downtown area. > > I have put up two places - in Richmond Va and > Alton Il. > > Due to the US-centr

Re: [Assp-user] How to change outbound server IP?

On 8/7/06, Evans Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > When ASSP tries to send responses to people who use the email interface, the > mail is failing with the following error: > > Aug-5-06 21:00:03 Couldn't create server socket to 127.0.0.1:125 -- aborting > ReturnMail connection > > I can't find

Re: [Assp-user] Stats and Reporting?

On 8/7/06, Lars Troen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I want to see if I can get some daily/weekly/monthly stats > > out of ASSP. > > I'm looking to create something with some nice charts to > > display proudly on the wall. > > > > Does anyone have anything that they use currently? > > I've been

[Assp-user] Stats and Reporting?

I want to see if I can get some daily/weekly/monthly stats out of ASSP. I'm looking to create something with some nice charts to display proudly on the wall. Does anyone have anything that they use currently? I can probably get something working but I though why start from scratch if you don't hav

Re: [Assp-user] WhiteRE

On 8/4/06, Roger Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The most prevalent feature we have is 500 women who think e-cards and > forwarding jokes are way cool. > My personal resolution (evil as it is) was to block the servers that host the images in those e-cards. This was not directly a spam blocki

Re: [Assp-user] Redlist

On 8/3/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > > Would it be sufficient, to have the redlist doing this or should redre > > doing the same? > > That's a great question. I think it would be beneficial to split the > functionality, and have it only effect the re

Re: [Assp-user] What is "Black RE: ''" ?

On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It says: > > Mail Matches Red RE: ' ' > > just like below. I dont' get it. > > It's something in my redre.txt file? > > Thanks! > C > > > geniusfreak wrote: > > On 8/3/0

Re: [Assp-user] What is "Black RE: ''" ?

On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For sure it wasn't. > > I replaced it with the default regex ASSP has and restarted assp and now see > it as having a red re: > > > Thanks, > Chris > > In analyzer I see this: > > > > Mail matches Red RE: '' What exactly is in th

Re: [Assp-user] What is "Black RE: ''" ?

Chris, Check your BlackRe (Expression to Identify Spam*) and make sure it's not blank. Blank RegEx strings can cause issues sometimes. Kevin On 8/3/06, Chris Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see this in my log: > > Jul-29-06 10:05:29 xx.xx.xx.xx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bl

Re: [Assp-user] Redlist

On 8/2/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > schreibt: > >Though it is sad, i would have liked it to do what we thought it did. > >(did that make sense?) > > > What do you think, the redlist/redre should do? > Prevent addit

Re: [Assp-user] Redlist

On 8/2/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Everyone - I'm really sorry about this. > Humans make mistakes. It happens. No worries! Though it is sad, i would have liked it to do what we thought it did. (did that make sense?) Kevin -

Re: [Assp-user] Redlist

On 8/2/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If thats true then I am operating on some outdated knowledge in regards to > the Redlist or more likely I am confusing the Redlist functionality with > another product. I apologize for the confusion. > I think we have a new feature req

Re: [Assp-user] Redlist

On 8/2/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What in this log should be Redlisted? > The remote email address. [EMAIL PROTECTED] According to what i understand of the RedList the email should have been flagged by the bayesian but not added to the spam folder like it was. Kevin

Re: [Assp-user] Redlist

On 8/2/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Something is wrong then. Check your logs, turn on debug, and verify what > is happening during your test. > I have 2 debug logs that I was able to capture during the middle of the night. However nothing stood out to me as to why. As

Re: [Assp-user] mail interface question and suggestion.

On 8/2/06, Dickson, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe there is a regex tutorial on Fritz's site. Very easy to > understand. > We have a wiki for that now. (that also has that tutorial on it) http://www.pointdee.co.uk/assp-wiki/index.php?title=Category:Regular_Expressions Kevin

Re: [Assp-user] Redlist

On 8/2/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *Redlisted mail does not enter the corpus*. That's it - period. Actually i found after testing it, that it did. I redlisted an external email address. (and confirmed it) Then i sent from that email address to myself. The email was ta

Re: [Assp-user] ClamAV

Does this info apply to the current version? http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/0566E192-000F4555 On 8/1/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To be more precise, the definition format changed and ASSP is no longer > compatible with the format used - and hasn't been in a very long t

Re: [Assp-user] Fwd: spam filtering PDF doc using regex

On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 Aug 2006 at 10:41, geniusfreak wrote: > > Currently giving an error: > whoops. tested it and then changed the link a bit. seems i broke it. there all better. Thanks for pointin

Re: [Assp-user] RFC - My first Wiki page

On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 Aug 2006 at 12:13, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > > Thanks for you work. > > Is it my setting, or is the line length too great for the wiki? > It's a CSS bug. I'm trying to see if there is anything we can do to fix it. Kevin ---

Re: [Assp-user] Fwd: spam filtering PDF doc using regex

On 8/1/06, John Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If someone looks at it and finds it useful, it might > be good to make a reference to it on the Wiki? > Reference added: http://www.pointdee.co.uk/assp-wiki/?title=BombRe_and_ScriptRe#Additional_Resources_.26_Extended_Reading My thanks to Julius f

Re: [Assp-user] RFC - Analyzer interface modifications (update)

On 8/1/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How's this look? > >http://www.espinola.net/images/content/assp/AnalyzerUpdate3.jpg > > What's changed: > >* I have increased the cell padding between Bad/Good to 20px. > I'm guessing you meant to link to AnalyzerUpdate4.jpg so i

Re: [Assp-user] RFC - My first Wiki page

On 8/1/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I took your added comment and merged it into a "Additional Resources" > section. What do you think? Cool with you? > > > looks better that way. nice job. - Take

Re: [Assp-user] RFC - My first Wiki page

On 7/31/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.pointdee.co.uk/assp-wiki/index.php?title=BombRe_and_ScriptRe * > > I'm looking for feedback on the content as well as layout. I'm new at > Wiki*, so be gentle. :-) > Anyone know how to kill that? > Don't worry about that "scr

Re: [Assp-user] RedList and Spam/NotSpam Contributions

On 7/31/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Redlisted (redlist or redRe) matches do not contribute to the corpus - > period. That is the sole purpose of the Redlist. Other processing may > take place, but the final result will not be contributed to the corpus.

[Assp-user] RedList and Spam/NotSpam Contributions

Ok, I need to settle a debate about the RedList. Does a RedListed email address contribute to the spam/notspam corpus? It was my understanding that the RedList was for addresses that you wanted to filter but did not want to contribute to the spam corpus. According to the RedList note in 1.2.4(6)

Re: [Assp-user] RFC - Analyzer interface modifications (update)

Michael, Looks good. Just a quick request. Can you add some padding between the "Good Words" and "Bad Words" column, the colors help but they are a bit to light to make it obvious IMHO. Kevin On 7/31/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Updated Screen-shot: >http://www.espino

Re: [Assp-user] Delaying - tuplets or triplets?

On 7/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 28 Jul 2006 at 14:32, geniusfreak wrote: > > > Aren't they both triplets or maybe one should say tuplets? > > When a triplet is whitelisted, it becomes a tuplet. 3 pieces of info => 2 > pieces. >

Re: [Assp-user] Delaying - tuplets or triplets?

On 7/28/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > schreibt: > > > >Is there some difference i'm just not understanding? > > The difference is that one file contains tuplets and the other file > contains triplets. > Ok, then why

Re: [Assp-user] Test results

On 7/25/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > schreibt: > >Yes, a whitelisted sender can be redlisted via the email interface; > >no a > >redlisted sender cannot be whitelisted via the email interface. > > It can: first remo

Re: [Assp-user] Mandatory installation of all modules

On 7/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have made some changes. Mostlly spelling and explanation notes. > > > > Installation (Windows) > > Download and install the latest 5.8.x.x version of ActivePerl from Active > State. The latest release can be found at > http://www.a

Re: [Assp-user] Delaying - tuplets or triplets?

On 7/28/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >So one contains "triplets" and the other "tuplets"? > >This is slightly confusing. > > why? > Because as far as i can tell there is no difference between the information in the files other than one is used for white listing and the other i

Re: [Assp-user] Delaying - tuplets or triplets?

On 7/28/06, Fritz Borgstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > schreibt: > > > >I took a look at the source and noticed that it references "triplets" > >when talking about normal entries in the DelayDb and it references > >"tuplets" when tal

[Assp-user] Delaying - tuplets or triplets?

Looking though the log I noticed these lines: --- Jul-28-06 00:29:15 Cleaning delaying database (triplets) finished; keys before=0, deleted=0 Jul-28-06 00:29:15 Cleaning delaying database (whitelisted tuplets) finished; keys before=0, dele

Re: [Assp-user] request for comments - Analyzer interface modifications

On 7/27/06, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm? Green does = good and red does = bad. I'm confused. I referred > to them as positive/ negative instead of good/bad because I consider > them factors that influence ASSP's final judgment to declare a message > spam or ham. Let m

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Wiki

You can create a link to the new page in an existing one then click that link and edit the blank page. OR Browse to : http://www.pointdee.co.uk/assp-wiki/index.php?title=My_new_page where "My_new_page" is the title of the article you want to make and then edit that page. hope that helps. On 7/27

Re: [Assp-user] request for comments - Analyzer interface modifications

I like it. The only issue i see is that there is no legend so you can tell what the colors mean just by looking at that screenshot. Howevershouldn't the colors be reversed? green = good? red = bad? or in other words "i'm showing you green because i did not find this message to be spam" and "I'

[Assp-user] Multiple ASSP Instances

Could someone be so kind and give me some insight into running multiple instances of ASSP on the same server? I want to create multiple MX records that point to separate external ip's that then point to a single server internally. This is so that we can move to separate servers later with little

[Assp-user] Advice, examples and thanks

Hello, I recently setup a ASSP server in a receive only setup to lighten the load on an exchange server. The server was getting it's queues filled faster than it could commit messages and would slowly build towards a crash if the incoming smtp was not stopped by the admin so the server could catch