GrayHat wrote:
>> If i need to enable the VRFY option, all is needed is to add the list
>> of accounts (acco...@example.com) in the (LocalAddresses_Flat)
>> right ?
>
> uhm no :) you'll have to ensure that VRFY is enabled on the mailserver
> (or the mailservers) and then use a "special format"
>> sounds like a plan :) ... also ensure that the delaying is enabled
>> and that the recipient validation is correctly configured (either
>> using LDAP or VRFY) those will help rejecting a whole lot of
>> junk coming from spambots w/o affecting regular servers
> If i need to enable the VRFY opti
GrayHat wrote:
> sounds like a plan :) ... also ensure that the delaying is enabled
> and that the recipient validation is correctly configured (either
> using LDAP or VRFY) those will help rejecting a whole lot of
> junk coming from spambots w/o affecting regular servers
>
If i need to enable t
> Thanks Grayhat,
Y/W
> I disabled testmode on all HELO checks as recommended
> and also added the same blacklisted addresses list from the
> SMTP server.
sounds like a plan :) ... also ensure that the delaying is enabled
and that the recipient validation is correctly configured (either
using
> well... I'd turn the HELO checks and the delaying "on"
>too; those won't
> cause trouble but will directly reject connections from
>a lot of
> spambots
> the same goes for blocked IPs and senderbase white/black
>listing
Thanks Grayhat,
I disabled testmode on all HELO checks as recommended and
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:37:39 +0200
"Fritz Borgstedt" wrote:
> You say, it is sufficient to set a limit very high, to
>allow all
> connections happen immediately.
> Quite funny if you ask me.
>
> The comment we put into the GUI reads : The maximum
>number of
> simultaneous SMTP sessions. This
> Few days back we put 2 ASSP servers in production in (testmode)
> except for DNSBL not in testmode. And it started filtering out lots of
> SPAM. :). CPU and Memory utilization was minimal.
well... I'd turn the HELO checks and the delaying "on" too; those won't
cause trouble but will directly rej
For Users of ASSP schreibt:
>
>I setup the Maximum Sessions (maxSMTPSessions) to 200 on each server
>and
>also on the MTA server there is enough connections limit to allow all
>connections comming from the ASSP servers.
You say, it is sufficient to set a limit very high, to allow all
connecti
Good morning all,
Few days back we put 2 ASSP servers in production in (testmode) except for
DNSBL not in testmode. And it started filtering out lots of SPAM. :). CPU
and Memory utilization was minimal.
I setup the Maximum Sessions (maxSMTPSessions) to 200 on each server and
also on the MTA se
