On 12/18/2007, Kevin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> I note a distinct lack of spamhaus on their list.
>>> http://www.opendns.com/support/article/33
>>>
>>> Perhaps I'll make a nice comprehensive list to send them.
>> Ummm... does Spamhaus do URIBLs? I thought they were only DNSBLs?
>> The page
Charles Marcus wrote:
> Kevin, on 12/14/2007 10:07 PM, said the following:
>> Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> Also, it appears that OpenDNS already worked around this issue for
>>> DNSBLs and URIBLs, even with 'Typo corrections' enabled:
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2gxrck
>
>> I note a distinct lack of
Kevin, on 12/14/2007 10:07 PM, said the following:
> Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Also, it appears that OpenDNS already worked around this issue for
>> DNSBLs and URIBLs, even with 'Typo corrections' enabled:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/2gxrck
> I note a distinct lack of spamhaus on their list.
> http:/
Charles Marcus wrote:
> Also, it appears that OpenDNS already worked around this issue for
> DNSBLs and URIBLs, even with 'Typo corrections' enabled:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2gxrck
>
I note a distinct lack of spamhaus on their list.
http://www.opendns.com/support/article/33
Perhaps I'll make a
Hi everyone,
This is just an fyi...
There was a thread a while back about using OpenDNS, and there were a
number of people who didn't like it because of the way it handled
non-existent domains...
Turns out this is a non-issue for anyone who has a static IP (hopefully
everyone here)...
All yo
