Re: [ast-developers] [ast-users] sh_run() can't call shell builtins (was Re: xargs broken (was Re: AT&T Software Technology ast beta software download update))

2012-10-23 Thread Glenn Fowler
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:23:36 +0200 Cedric Blancher wrote: > PS: When are you going to update ast-open? The new alphas of ast-ksh > are very cool (grep, xargs, iconv et al), but a complete set of AST > utilities (pax!) would be nice to have. good point I'll include ast-open in the next alpha which

Re: [ast-developers] [ast-users] sh_run() can't call shell builtins (was Re: xargs broken (was Re: AT&T Software Technology ast beta software download update))

2012-10-23 Thread Cedric Blancher
On 20 October 2012 20:03, Cedric Blancher wrote: > On 22 September 2012 09:18, Cedric Blancher > wrote: >> On 4 July 2012 15:38, Cedric Blancher wrote: >>> On 28 June 2012 17:05, Glenn Fowler wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:48:07 +0200 Cedric Blancher wrote: > On 27 June 2012 22:15,

Re: [ast-developers] Something funky going on with mailman?

2012-10-23 Thread Glenn Fowler
I was just informed that the att research mail lists (there are others beside ast-* uwin-*) are being reorganized into att-internal vs external until that reorganization is finished mail archives will be offline I'll post when the archives are back up until then no-one will be pummeled for repe

[ast-developers] Something funky going on with mailman?

2012-10-23 Thread Jens Schweikhardt
Hello *, I can't seem to access the web page that's appended to each ast-developers mail, https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers All I ever get is Forbidden You don't have permission to access /mailman/listinfo/ast-developers/ on this server. Apache/2.2.15 (C

Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-23 Thread Lionel Cons
On 23 October 2012 15:20, Glenn Fowler wrote: > >>> Version: 93u+-1.1 > > not sure about this nomenclature > ast ksh reports a version matching "93[a-z][-+]? -MM-DD" These are Debian version numbers. Oliver Kiddle can explain how they translate into ast/ksh version numbers. Lionel _

Re: [ast-developers] ast-ksh 2012-10-12 alpha

2012-10-23 Thread Lionel Cons
On 13 October 2012 16:40, Glenn Fowler wrote: > ast-ksh 2012-10-12 alpha posted When will the next alpha be released? Lionel ___ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developer

Re: [ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-23 Thread Glenn Fowler
>> Version: 93u+-1.1 not sure about this nomenclature ast ksh reports a version matching "93[a-z][-+]? -MM-DD" On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:54:31 +0200 Cedric Blancher wrote: > Just saw this. Is this a known issue? > Ced > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Oliver Kiddle > Date: 22

Re: [ast-developers] rfe: .sh.regex.available_character_class array?

2012-10-23 Thread Cedric Blancher
On 22 October 2012 19:44, Roland Mainz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Cedric Blancher > wrote: >> Request for enhancement: .sh.regex.available_character_class >> >> What do you think about adding a .sh.regex.available_character_class >> array variable which contains the list of availa

[ast-developers] Fwd: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases

2012-10-23 Thread Cedric Blancher
Just saw this. Is this a known issue? Ced -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Kiddle Date: 22 October 2012 22:06 Subject: Bug#691200: ksh: cd .. doesn't work in many cases To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Package: ksh Version: 93u+-1.1 Justification: renders package unusable Severit