Cory,
We have a relationship with a service provider on the west coast that deploys these. I may hook up a deal. How many you got?
Bob
On 9/7/06, Cory Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have some New, Sealed Cisco IAD-2431-1T1E1 units available for sale due to a project cancellation. C
I have some New, Sealed Cisco IAD-2431-1T1E1 units
available for sale due to a project cancellation. Cisco list price/msrp on
these units is $4500+
The Cisco IAD2430 series integrated access devices (IADs)
aggregate multiple channels of data and voice or fax user-side traffic for
transpo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Smith wrote:
> "I won't be drawn into a public flamefest over this."
>
> heheh that was like 45 posts ago
Yeah, but I was bored then, I have to get back to work now!
:D
- --
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
"I won't be drawn into a public flamefest over this."
heheh that was like 45 posts ago
Matt Riddell (IT) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
why do you keep stalking me on various forums and posting hostile
messages in response to mine, com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> why do you keep stalking me on various forums and posting hostile
> messages in response to mine, coming off as if you speak offically for
> digium on legal issues? I fail to see your logic in all of this, but
> hey I
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:27 +0200, Matt Riddell (IT) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> >> 3. Why do you feel the need to constantly attack Digium? You constantly
> >> accuse everyone else of hostility and yet come off sounding like a 30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
>> 3. Why do you feel the need to constantly attack Digium? You constantly
>> accuse everyone else of hostility and yet come off sounding like a 30
>> year old with remaining teen angst.
>>
> I am sorry are you accusing
Dear All,
Lima Peru DID Numbers are now available with us on stock.
Please email me if you have any queries on it.
Linda
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi Everyone,
Just noticed these on Ebay while trying to look busy at my desk. Looks like a good deal if you're in the market for something of this nature.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320025051395
Mark
___
--Bandwidth and
*BUMP*
i love drama ..
don't let this threat die.. i have so nothing else to do today ;)
ps. j/k
Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
I am following this discussion closely. Digium's GPL, patent licensing,
and (possibly) proprietary code is of central business relevance. Where
else should I watc
- trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your responses seemed a bit hostile, as they have in the past,
> whenever
> something comes up that digium wants squashed. Like last year I
> asked
> 'is there a list of what I have to do to make asteirsk gpl
> compliant'.
Then I'm sorry
I am following this discussion closely. Digium's GPL, patent licensing,
and (possibly) proprietary code is of central business relevance. Where
else should I watch the discussion? Should everyone interested also
subscribe to a separate discussion?
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 16:39 +0100, Senad
You say its not your code. But yet, why would you
actually admit to one of your own leaking it. Well
some research has been done one the code.. here's what
we found..
the g723.1 library code that was posted matches the
library code distributed by Digium and committed to
CVS by Mark in March 200
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:35 -0400, Michael Workman wrote:
> ONLY ONES WHO HAD WRITE ACCESS TO CVS WAS DIGIUM STAFF
>
>
yes and t hey rmed it and mark originally commited it (based on what
others said). However in all fairness, and I made the same mistake and
admitted it at least twice now, I di
On 9/7/06, Michael Workman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ONLY ONES WHO HAD WRITE ACCESS TO CVS WAS DIGIUM STAFF
That's completely untrue. There are a number of committers to the
public source trees that are not employees of Digium.
--
Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc.
http://www.btwtech.com/
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ONLY ONES WHO HAD WRITE ACCESS TO CVS WAS DIGIUM STAFF
Can u PLEASE stop replying to this thread. It is wasting everybody's time.
If you have a problem with Digium, take this issue directly with them.
Senad
___
--Bandwidth
ONLY ONES WHO HAD WRITE ACCESS TO CVS WAS DIGIUM STAFF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 11:07 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digi
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 10:12 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> - trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:12 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> > > - trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Since the code does appear to be very much id
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 16:44 +0200, Matt Riddell (IT) wrote:
> 1. I doubt it was Digium who got the links removed. I for one posted to
> the abuse emails on those sites and asked for them to be removed.
>
from kevin himself
- James Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why did Digium request tha
- trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:12 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> > - trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since the code does appear to be very much identical to code that
> was
> > > denied to exist in the first place
- Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you are saying Digium has never distributed G723 and/or G723.1
> codec in any form?
Did I say that? No, I did not say that.
The response to the code posting clearly stated that Digium has never
distributed a binary G.723 codec module. At one
Hey I'm not partial to any side here, but how can't you consider discussions on licensing and rights to not be related to asterisk business. If you don't like what people have to say in this thread then don't read it.
On 9/7/06, BJ Weschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/7/06, Shidan <[EMAIL PROTEC
So you are saying Digium has never distributed G723 and/or G723.1
codec in any form?
Best regards,
Andrew Joakimsen
On 9/7/06, Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about the G723 code that used to be on the Digium CVS server?
Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:12 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>> - trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Since the code does appear to be very much identical to code that was
>>> denied to exist in t
On 9/7/06, Shidan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And this is a biz topic BJ.
On 9/7/06, BJ Weschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 9/6/06, James Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does not make it right.
> Brandon Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Because their still a business that needs to make money. Serve
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:12 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> - trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since the code does appear to be very much identical to code that was
> > denied to exist in the first place, but links were posted that makes
> > it
> > appear identical in ma
- trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the code does appear to be very much identical to code that was
> denied to exist in the first place, but links were posted that makes
> it
> appear identical in many ways. Kinda makes one wonder what the real
> story is.
Nobody de
And this is a biz topic BJ.On 9/7/06, BJ Weschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/6/06, James Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Does not make it right.> Brandon Galbraith wrote:>> > Because their still a business that needs to make money. Servers,
> > salaries, etc. cost money.> >> > -brandon> > Thi
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 08:12 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> - Joe Shmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You say its not your code. But yet, why would you
> > actually admit to one of your own leaking it. Well
> > some research has been done one the code.. here's what
> > we found..
>
> Plea
We have special
offer for Poland Mobile
All Poland Mobile
0.09 Euro/minute
billing
1/1
codec g711 - g729 -
gsm
protocole SIP -
IAX
Thierry
tél: +33 (0)3 90 40 06 75
fax: +33 (0)3 90 40 06 75
web: http://www.widevoip.com
___
--Bandwidt
On 9/6/06, James Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does not make it right.
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> Because their still a business that needs to make money. Servers,
> salaries, etc. cost money.
>
> -brandon
>
This is a -biz list. This thread is way off topic. Everyone please
stop posting to
- Joe Shmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You say its not your code. But yet, why would you
> actually admit to one of your own leaking it. Well
> some research has been done one the code.. here's what
> we found..
Please demonstrate where anyone from Digium has 'admitted to one of our own
You say its not your code. But yet, why would you
actually admit to one of your own leaking it. Well
some research has been done one the code.. here's what
we found..
the g723.1 library code that was posted matches the
library code distributed by Digium and committed to
CVS by Mark in March 200
- Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about the G723 code that used to be on the Digium CVS server?
Is there a question here? What about it?
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Senior Software Engineer
Digium, Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation pr
You say its not your code. But yet, why would you
actually admit to one of your own leaking it. Well
some research has been done one the code.. here's what
we found..
the g723.1 library code that was posted matches the
library code distributed by Digium and committed to
CVS by Mark in March 200
Dear Jose,
Contact me off list.
Regards,
Priyang Patel ( Jim )
Manager ( Operations )
Broadband Telecom, Inc.
We Value your
voice
514, South Kenneth Road,
Burbank, CA, 91501, USA
( : +1-818-276-1127
4 : +1-530-730-3088
, : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN: [EMAIL PR
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 22:16 -0400, Shidan wrote:
> I honestly don't think these points would ever stand up in court. How
> can you include something
> and say you can use it and freely redistribute and in fact you can
> modify it even as long as
> you redistribute your modifications but then clai
When you need people, could you please mention where are you located and if
you need them on-site ?
Thanks,
Fred Cole writes:
need an asterisk programmer to maintain existing system. msg me off list.
Thanks,
-fred-
___
--Bandwidth and Coloca
Dear list,I work for a VoIP provider and we are studying new partnerships with termination providers. We are looking for white (high quality) routes only where the big market is supposed to be Europe. Brazilian and African market is also a must in what concerns to rates issues. Can you please send
Hello,
Anyone has references about the company PICAP / EMXI / LINTUX ?
These company manufacturing Wifi IP Phones from Malaysia, but an order
placed two months ago has no replay. Seems a fraudulent company...
--
Un saludo,
Juan Carlos Valero
40 matches
Mail list logo
