Steve Totaro wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>
>> Conrad Wood wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:42 -0500, Paul wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
As a general rule don't do business with klingons
>>>
>>> why? did you have a bad experience dealing with klingons? ;-)
>>>
>>
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 13:25 -0800, shadowym wrote:
> I am simply stating that Enterprise class equipment is generally
> mean't for
> people who don't really care about price.
What a ridiculous statement. For nearly two decades I have worked both
for big vendors and the Telco/Enterpise side and p
I have a client consignment of Cisco IP Phones available for immediate
sale.
You may purchase single units, or I would entertain an offer for all.
Single units purchase prices are firm, take all price is negotiable.
These units are all in Like New condition, and will be offered with a
90- day warr
Not all of us are Enterprise, some want carrier class features at small
business prices. :-p
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "shadowym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'"
Greetings,
Could you explain the nature of this fraud to me in
more detail?
We have taken several signups from US customers in
the last week which had me perplexed (as we're an Australian ITSP). Two of them
have cleared CC funds thus far, and their accounts were duly activated (and ha
I am simply stating that Enterprise class equipment is generally mean't for
people who don't really care about price. Most people involved in Asterisk
are here because they want Enterprise class features at small business
prices.
Chill out dude,
Take your own advice and think before you post.
GlobalOfficePhone wrote:
Kristian:
Astlinux is one potential solution. I remember reading about GumStix
whic you first showed at Astricon. One of the applications suggested for
Gumstix was to enable local phones behind a NAT to communicate with a
remote Asterisk server. That would enable the
Kristian:Astlinux is one potential solution. I remember reading about GumStix whic you first showed at Astricon. One of the applications suggested for Gumstix was to enable local phones behind a NAT to communicate with a remote Asterisk server. That would enable the local phones to bypass the Aster
I think it goes up to $18k. Not so sure its worth it, no matter what it
does.
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "shadowym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'"
Sent: Frida
I appreciate the thoughts posted on the this thread. If I may, I would like to rephrase the question about hosted VoIP for SMBs:Can Asterisk allow direct media (audio) between two end points that are behind a NAT (typical SMB scenario) that is different than the the NAT where Asterisk server is loc
Brett wrote:
You guys need to look into the Ranch Networks solution. With a Hosted
PBX, you can put the Asterisk box at you location. Then we take a Ranch
Networks box and put it at the customers site. the Ranch Networks box
does all the NAT traversal, qos, firewall, etc. plus it will bring
shadowym wrote:
If you need to ask the price you can't afford it. I'm sure their stuff is
nice but Enterprise class equipment and pricing is just that.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Or
If you need to ask the price you can't afford it. I'm sure their stuff is
nice but Enterprise class equipment and pricing is just that.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Disc
How redundant is it? I'm still waiting to
hear from them directly, but is it completely 1 + 1 redundant? It might
protect against Asterisk failures, but does it then become a single point of
failure?
Mike HammettIntelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com
- Origi
You might also want to check out www.exinda.com does the same thing.
Cheers,
Dean
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett
Sent: Friday, 3 November 2006
12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discuss
Brett wrote:
You guys need to look into the Ranch Networks solution. With a Hosted
PBX, you can put the Asterisk box at you location. Then we take a
Ranch Networks box and put it at the customers site. the Ranch
Networks box does all the NAT traversal, qos, firewall, etc. plus it
will bring
Please send me more information about your flat rate termination.
Thanks,
Matt Dunkin
Vijay Shan wrote:
Quote# VS-10122006-USA
USA WHOLESALE VOIP TERMINATION on SIP and H323
Protocol: SIP, H323
Codec: G729, G711u
CLI, DTMF, T38 FAX supported
Production SIP trunk includes private secured
You guys need to look into the Ranch Networks solution. With a Hosted PBX, you can put the Asterisk box at you location. Then we take a Ranch Networks box and put it at the customers site. the Ranch Networks box does all the NAT traversal, qos, firewall, etc. plus it will bring the media locally
I would try to avoid Pakistan... Beautiful people, I regard them
highly, but somehow telecom business and them have not worked out for me.
CS
Peter Bowyer wrote:
Anyone got a reliable route for Narnia?
On 03/11/06, pcman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Teletubbies are in the same ba
You looking to Call the Lion or the Witch in the Wardrobe
On 03/11/06, pcman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Teletubbies are in the same basket? ;)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/3/06, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > Paul wrote:
> > > Conrad Wood wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Thu, 2006-11
Anyone got a reliable route for Narnia?
On 03/11/06, pcman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Teletubbies are in the same basket? ;)
On 11/3/06, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> > Conrad Wood wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:42 -0500, Paul wrote:
> >>
> >
Does Teletubbies are in the same basket? ;)On 11/3/06, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Paul wrote:> Conrad Wood wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:42 -0500, Paul wrote:
> As a general rule don't do business with klingons>> why? did you have a bad experience dealing with
Quote# VS-10122006-USAUSA WHOLESALE VOIP TERMINATION on SIP and H323Protocol: SIP, H323Codec: G729, G711uCLI, DTMF, T38 FAX supportedProduction SIP trunk includes private secured access CRM tool, balance, rated CDR download, calls per source phone number and many more features.
US 48 States & Canad
Hi All,
We're currently doing a promotion to attract off-peak traffic. We're
offering wholesale UK landline termination (+44 1,2) at GBP 0.0030 between
Saturday 00:00 GMT and Sunday 23:59 GMT.
Termination direct via TDM/SS#7 straight into UK network.
Traceroutes welcome to 213.166.5.135
If
I had no technical issue with them. but when I choose to stop using there service they had continue billing me.Nice part is there where not suppose to automaticly refill my account at all.After a few tentative to get refund from them without result I've let master card deal with them.
But they did
Paul wrote:
Conrad Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:42 -0500, Paul wrote:
As a general rule don't do business with klingons
why? did you have a bad experience dealing with klingons? ;-)
Yes, they try to call me collect from outer space prisons where they
26 matches
Mail list logo
