Re: [asterisk-biz] UK and Australia unlimited calling channels needed

broadvoice.com > > Hi > We need UKfixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min, we will > pay a fixed amount > per month per line. > > We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this for > Australia land lines as well. > > Regards > Adi > > > Super Techn

[asterisk-biz] UK and Australia unlimited calling channels needed

Hi We need UK fixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min, we will pay a fixed amount per month per line. We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this for Australia land lines as well. Regards Adi ___ --Bandwidth

Re: [asterisk-biz] OT:Any guy from Teliax here?

Interesting, I've been with Teliax for over 2years now and the one thing I have always been able to depend on is that my emails have always been answered and my phone calls have also always been answered with almost 0 on-hold time. They have been great for me and I would recommend them to anyone.

Re: [asterisk-biz] Vonage PEER

Dear Matt, Super Technologies has many products not Just DIDX. Email was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] not [EMAIL PROTECTED] The question I asked had nothing to do with DIDX. What DIDX does with Vonage should be available on DIDX's web site. If you get STORIES about DIDX and Others in your dreams

Re: [asterisk-biz] Verizon wholesale contact

yep, it takes a little settling, but does work and works well only thing is you get to pass rtp through you -wasim On 1/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Matt wrote: > We are talking about the ex-MCI I believe. I have a question. I > recently talked wi

Re: [asterisk-biz] LATA 888

Correct - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Vijay Shan To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] LATA 888 Canada? On 1/2

Re: [asterisk-biz] Verizon wholesale contact

On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Matt wrote: > We are talking about the ex-MCI I believe. I have a question. I > recently talked with Verizon about this.. and there was no monthly fee, > or Co-Lo required.. infact their stuff looked very tempting... however > the VPN.. What the heck?! Anyone here have any

Re: [asterisk-biz] Vonage PEER

On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Matt wrote: > Now wait a second... Rehan I thought you claimed that didx was > already inbed, so to speak, with Vonage, had numbers from Vonage, etc, > etc?! This is why I don't do business with didx the stories keep > changing. s/inbed/inbred/ -alex __

Re: [asterisk-biz] LATA 888

Canada? On 1/26/07, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can anyone here service LATA 888? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com

Re: [asterisk-biz] Verizon wholesale contact

We are talking about the ex-MCI I believe. I have a question. I recently talked with Verizon about this.. and there was no monthly fee, or Co-Lo required.. infact their stuff looked very tempting... however the VPN.. What the heck?! Anyone here have any ideas how to set that up to work with A

Re: [asterisk-biz] Vonage PEER

Now wait a second... Rehan I thought you claimed that didx was already inbed, so to speak, with Vonage, had numbers from Vonage, etc, etc?! This is why I don't do business with didx the stories keep changing. On 1/22/07, Rehan Allah Wala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Anyone here a

(Fwd) [asterisk-biz] China required

Hello We can give u for .0099 cent a min. You can test on carrierx.org Let me know your account number to make that rate for u. Rehan --- Forwarded message follows --- From: Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com Date sent:

[asterisk-biz] LATA 888

Can anyone here service LATA 888? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.dig

Re: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

I'd recommend Mikrotik for your QoS. www.visualware.com has a good VoIP test. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "James Hawks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Di

Re: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

The GXP 2000 with the firmware release you are using is pretty good so I don't think you should consider this a problem.Some early firmware (before 1.1.1.9) was not very good and unfortunately this has given the product a less than favorable reputation. I have been using this phone in production fo

Re: [asterisk-biz] reventix SIPbase ISDN-BOX (external ISDN gateway) for Asterisk

Sorry for broken Link! :-( Now the site is also available in English: http://www.sipbase.de/index.php?id=prod_isdnbox&L=en PDF data sheet is still only available on the German site. Will be translated next week. ;-) Best regards. -- reventix | SIPbase e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sip

[asterisk-biz] Philippines routes.

I am looking for some Philippines route for personal use. Something that allows us to call directly to land lines and cell phones. I am not looking for unlimited type of account. Rates via voipjet and others are not in line with what we need. -- Ariel Batista Kasi International Office: 305-574-

Re: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

I don't understand why people would use CentOS, which is basically Fedora with several enterprise components added, none of which should need to be present on a PABX system - it is all just bloat which should be un-installed at the first opportunity. In fact I would even suggest that Fedora and R

RE: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

I have to whole heartedly agree. I just don't understand why people would use Fedora when they have CentOS. It's a complete mystery to me. Btw: I'm using Asterisk 1.2.13 on CentOS 4.4 and it's rock solid. Over 3 months of uptime now. -Original Message- From: Mike Hammett [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

We implemented a 100 person call center using asterisk and Grandstream phones. We had countless problems with our implementation which included dropped calls, static, and several phone problems. Most of our problems were solved by switching to Polycom phones from Grandstream. I have seen lots of pe

[asterisk-biz] DID for Austin,

I have DID for all this place, They are in State of Texas. Adamsville, Austin,Barlett, Belton, Bertram, Briggs, Buchanan Dam, Buckholts, Burnet, Copperas Cove, Florence, Fort Hood, Georgetown, Granger, Granite Shoals, Hamilton, Heidenheimer, Holland, Hutto, Jarrell, Kempner, Killeen, King

Re: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

I would never run Asterisk on Fedora. Why when you can use CentOS, which is also free, basically Redhat Enterprise, and is more intended as a server? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Steve Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[asterisk-biz] China required

If someone could provide good China (+86) and especially chinesse mobiles with acceptable connect time please contact me offlist. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options vis

Re: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

The only time I have seen such odd behaviour was when I had (experimentally) built some applications with MMX enabled. This caused some real trouble with both the compiled application, and with other un-related applications on the box. This only caused a problem on VIA and AMD chips. A perhaps re

Re: [asterisk-biz] reventix SIPbase ISDN-BOX (external ISDN gateway) for Asterisk

That's good, but absence of English description and "The requested URL /fileadmin/pdf/de/SIPbase_ISDN_Box_C900_2007-01-02.pdf was not found on this server" is quite impressive for promoting your product... On 26 January 2007 18:55, reventix | SIPbase wrote: > Hello Asterisk friends, > > we pr

Re: [asterisk-biz] Grandstream GXP-2000, Asterisk 1.2.13 stability problems

I do not believe the phones or configuration could cause any of the problems you describe. My best guess would be the server. You don't describe the server much, but I would look at the hardware. First, remove or delete from CMOS all ports and unnecessary parts such as COM, LPT, USB ports and

[asterisk-biz] reventix SIPbase ISDN-BOX (external ISDN gateway) for Asterisk

Hello Asterisk friends, we proudly present you our SIPbase ISDN-BOX for Asterisk: * Opposite to other gateways, the ISDN-BOX is an external device independent of the server running the PBX. The connection is physically realized by an Ethernet cord and the IP address logically - that's it! * As a

RE: [asterisk-biz] PBX Manager by thirdlane

Gregory Boehnlein wrote: >>> Another advantage of PBX Manager is that all common functions >>> including Follow Me, Call Screening etc are programmed only with >>> internal asterisk dialplan commands without any AGI functions - all >>> those external processes provides much higher load on system an

RE: [asterisk-biz] PBX Manager by thirdlane

> > Another advantage of PBX Manager is that all common functions > > including Follow Me, Call Screening etc are programmed only with > > internal asterisk dialplan commands without any AGI functions - all > > those external processes provides much higher load on system and > > increase risk o

RE: [asterisk-biz] PBX Manager by thirdlane

> Another advantage of PBX Manager is that all common functions > including Follow Me, Call Screening etc are programmed only with > internal asterisk dialplan commands without any AGI functions - all > those external processes provides much higher load on system and > increase risk of system faul

RE: [asterisk-biz] PBX Manager by thirdlane

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Senad, > > Please accept my apologies if my message came across as if I was > trying to bash your product. That was not my intention. > > However, it did help me understand a bit better your product line. If > I would be in need of such solution, I know I can go to you