I read through each of the patents Verizon alleges Vonage is infringing.
The patents are extremely broad and two seem to possibly apply to parts of
Asterisk. If Verizon is successful in its case against Vonage, could Digium
be next in its sights ?
See:
Enhanced internet domain name server
Steve Totaro wrote:
A hardware provider and a service provider are two completely
different animals.
It is legal (in Maryland anyways) to sell products such drug
paraphernalia, it only becomes a problem when it is used.
Thanks
Steve
This is not entirely true. A product manufactured with
Ok,
So wouldn't that put Level3 in violation? They use enumI'm pretty sure
other ACTUAL Telcos use it as well!!! It almost sounds like rather then
enum, Verizon has a patent on DNS servers
At any rate.
628... and 610... seem to talk about enum (or DNS). If you aren't running
enum you
If Digium were a service provider, maybe.
Alex Brecher wrote:
I read through each of the patents Verizon alleges Vonage is infringing.
The patents are extremely broad and two seem to possibly apply to parts of
Asterisk. If Verizon is successful in its case against Vonage, could Digium
be next
This is basically enum.There's nothing to say Asterisk can't provide
this functionality in their software, just like Cisco can. The problem is
in if you use it. We don't, and Vonage clearly feels they can get around
it, so I don't think it's a huge issue. Originally, people were saying
Mark C wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
A hardware provider and a service provider are two completely
different animals.
It is legal (in Maryland anyways) to sell products such drug
paraphernalia, it only becomes a problem when it is used.
Thanks
Steve
This is not entirely true. A product
JR Richardson wrote:
The 4PSA VoipNow 1.4.0 demo is available at:
http://www.4psa.com/products/voipnow/demo.php
Guys,
You are marketing geniuses. This video is going into my geek video hall of
fame!
Bravo!
Can I get her to do some tech videos for my firm as well? At least
Yes!
Verizon should have never been granted those patents in the first place
IMHO. Kind of like owning a patent to make toast!
Don't know if they could go after Asterisk but it sounds like they could go
after just about any ITSP.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Brecher [mailto:[EMAIL
or the Asterisk Biz mail-order bride forum?
Anyway, I really do think she is a star. She makes the concept look less
geeky and she does that without acting like a mindless bimbo. If I were
a reseller, I would be proud to give this video to prospective clients.
Brian Fertig wrote:
ohh good
I wish the US attorney general would go after a large company for
abusing the patent system. Antitrust and racketeering are 2 things that
come to mind.
shadowym wrote:
The difference is that Cisco could drag this out in the courts
indefinitely as they probably have more cash than Verizon.
The US Attorney and its Justice Department is so disconnected from
politics for hire that it has already destroyed the biggest US
monopolies and conspiracies, like Microsoft and Big Tobacco. The US is
an entrepreneur's paradise, where entrenched industry dominators tremble
as little guys
11 matches
Mail list logo
