I like OpenRisk myself! ;)
Your English is fine. :)
-- Nitzan
--- Juan Carlos Valero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about a GPL name for Asterisk ? Currently is not possible to use
> Asterisk brand name if your bussiness is not affiliated with Digium
> Ecosystem. A "OpenAsterisk" brand nam
randulo wrote:
character. But we digress. Sure, why not just call it Asterix like the
rest of the world? Oh, darn, that's a trademark too. Asteriks?
Nastyrisk?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocati
Actually in the countries I work in (we have servers in 3 countries,
including the one you mention) the norm is 8ms - 20ms. However
we do have customers farther away and they go up to 200 and sometimes
even more.
All I am saying is that latency is only one factor, and there are others
such as pa
In your country, the current norm is probably around 200 ms. But since
that is the case, I imagine ISPs are more dedicated to eliminating lost
packets, etc. so the service does not suffer except for (very) slight
delays. Last time I spoke to my father (same country) via VoIP, he
couldn't notice a d
While I totally agree with you that they shouldn't waste time on
customers they cannot provide reliable service to, unfortunately as far
as I've seen a large portion of so-called "providers" are actually
reselling service from other providers, and sometimes THEIR provider is
reselling that service
randulo ha scritto:
> character. But we digress. Sure, why not just call it Asterix like the
> rest of the world? Oh, darn, that's a trademark too. Asteriks?
I clearly remember the guys that developed a TFTP-like protocol for
mobile phones thru serial port to call their project Obelisk and they
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Juan Carlos Valero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> El mié, 13-02-2008 a las 11:21 -0500, Jared Smith escribió:
> What about a GPL name for Asterisk ? Currently is not possible to use
> Asterisk brand name if your bussiness is not affiliated with Digium
> Ecosyst
Dave,
I can comment on 100ms delay remark, that it is not always true. We
have call center customers who have 180 - 220ms and are happy.
There are other factors besides latency which can effect quality, so I
do not completely agree with your comment
Moshe
dave cantera wrote:
moshe, nitz
