Trixter said:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 01:36 -0500, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
DIDx has an "alternate ring-to" feature. So if our Asterisk server is
down, the calls can roll-over elsewhere.
are you saying that your asterisk server is constantly down? Shouldnt
that be addressed? I mean failover fea
>> No idea, but when I tested didx' alternate ring to it worked.
>>
>> It does however take 40+ seconds before it kicks in for chanunavail /
>> congestion.
>>
>> Also by default the interface is set to configure the Not Answered case
>> which isn't great.
>>
>> When I need failover I usually set up
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:22 AM, wrote:
>>> DIDx has an "alternate ring-to" feature. So if our Asterisk server is
>>> down, the calls can roll-over elsewhere.
>>
>> are you saying that your asterisk server is constantly down? Shouldnt
>> that be addressed? I mean failover features are nice, but
>> DIDx has an "alternate ring-to" feature. So if our Asterisk server is
>> down, the calls can roll-over elsewhere.
>
> are you saying that your asterisk server is constantly down? Shouldnt
> that be addressed? I mean failover features are nice, but when the app
> requires constant failover you
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 01:36 -0500, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
> DIDx has an "alternate ring-to" feature. So if our Asterisk server is
> down, the calls can roll-over elsewhere.
>
are you saying that your asterisk server is constantly down? Shouldnt
that be addressed? I mean failover features are n
