On Sun, 3 May 2009, ContactTel Business wrote:
> Ah yeah , your right, out of 5 upstreams 0 have consistent formats..
> But all do have Canada/usa in NPANXX format, then another CSV fo the INT
I don't even mind the inconsistency, though it would be nice.
Of the 5 upstreams, do they provide y
I wonder how a blue screen sounds like...
From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Drew Gibson
Sent: May-03-09 10:43 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Brokerage Firms and Asteri
Call their bluff and ask for documentation on who has done the
"forbidding" and why.
I know that at least one major FX trading firm uses Asterisk globally.
Both Cisco and Nortel know something about VoIP systems.
Both started with theirs sitting on MS Windows.
Both have migrated their PBXs to *
You're making overly optimistic assumptions about the reading
comprehension, technical acumen and communicative erudition of people in
the business-focused discursive spaces. :-)
Peter Beckman wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009, ContactTel Business wrote:
>
>> My point exactly always suckers that tr
David,
There is no such industry-wide ban on Asterisk.
The FBI warning was issued in December 2008 about a vulnerability in
Asterisk SIP authentication. The vulnerability was documented by Digium in
Asterisk Security Advisory AST-2008-003, and had been resolved NINE months
earlier, in March 2008.
Ah yeah , your right, out of 5 upstreams 0 have consistent formats..
But all do have Canada/usa in NPANXX format, then another CSV fo the INT
>>-Original Message-
>>From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-
>>boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Peter Beckman
>
On Sun, 3 May 2009, ContactTel Business wrote:
My point exactly always suckers that try to get 0.1
termination.. but want TDM quality...
THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT COST OR TRYING TO GET THE LOWEST PRICE!!!
Lord have mercy on this thread.
The thread is about how termination prov
CC1 Enum was just awarded to Telecordia... And if you are familiar with
telecordia, it means that ENUM in North America will be business as usual
for the large telecoms... Do you honestly think they are going to give up
those multi-million dollar caps revenue streams?
K
> From: Justin Newman
>
Does anyone on the list know the ENUM penetration rates for the US domestic,
Canada, and international?
Has ENUM gained much traction internationally?
Justin
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-b
> On 4/30/2009 20:35, Matt Riddell wrote:
> > Looks like their DNS entries are gone?
>
> ns2.nufone.net is responding to ping, but not to DNS requests.
> ns1.nufone.net is dead to both.
>
> > Maybe they forgot to renew their domain name?
>
> Nope:
> Domain Name: NUFONE.NET
> Updated Dat
My point exactly always suckers that try to get 0.1
termination.. but want TDM quality...
Hence why not have an @ cost scenario or even worst.. just make it free like
some do.. and play ads..
And wtf we talking about this ?
From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com
[ma
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Stephen Davies wrote:
You seem to want to evaluate termination providers on nothing else except
price.
I'm guessing by "You" you mean me. No, it's not about price. It's about
a comprehensive document, usually a .csv file, that includes what routes a
termination provide
I didn't infer that he wants to evaluate based solely on price. If it
were me, I would want that same information in order to simply put the
price issue to bed such that I could evaluate other factors with less
obfuscation of the total package. Plus, I regard the easy access to
pricing data a
2009/5/1 Peter Beckman
> Alexander Harrowell wrote:
>
> What's needed is a rate deck that includes every route the provider
>
> supports, US, Canada and everything else.
>
Hi,
You seem to want to evaluate termination providers on nothing else except
price. I'm not sure why encouraging that si
you should read about the companies that are not allowed to use Microsoft...
Asterisk is not safe using default install, as well as Microsoft OS'es
arnt.. would you push a fresh xp install to a directly connected modem ?
Same with asterisk.. iptables is your friend
>>-Original Message-
What is the basic computer hardware requirements for the TE420B
Steve
**Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003)
_
Sounds like standard Microsoft FUD tactics to me.
As google seems to indicate, the warning is mostly due to idiots not being
able to configure a somewhat secure installation of Asterisk, something
that can also happens on Microsoft.
You could counter with the dozens of windows related warnings t
We have been approached by a brokerage firm to upgrade their phone
system to VoIP and presented Asterisk as a solution. Our competition
is pushing Microsoft's system and states that Asterisk is forbidden in
the industry especially following last year's FBI warning. Anybody
have clarificatio
Also, with moneris, (www.moneris.com) you have a phone IVR.. so you could
make asterisk dial the number and send the appropriate digits , and capture
the voice auth #
You pass your merchant ID, the amount, card, expiry
It results auth # ,
From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com
Dennis, they have been phenomenally responsive, I expect part of that comes
from the fact it's a smaller company and they can afford to pay a bit more
attention to their customers. When I had a serious issue, I was able to
email their CTO directly, but again the disclaimer is that I somewhat 'knew
Rob,
I don't think anyone is paying attention, to what is been said..
How have you found NMI's customer support and service levels?
regards
Dennid
--- On Sun, 3/5/09, Rob Rothberg wrote:
> From: Rob Rothberg
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Credit processing ...
> To: "Commercial and Business-O
Perhaps NOBODY IS LISTENING TO ME?? That's EXACTLY what I've been
recommending!!! www.nmi.com - Network Merchants.
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:14 AM, C. Savinovich
wrote:
> Well, I, personally, have not found one provider that allows me to do
> that… can you recommend me one?
>
>
>
> CS
>
>
>
Ok... You are all missing the point... Any provider that does authorize.net
or payflow or has a ³web based merchant gateway² API can do this... Its
simple enuff to collect the CC#, CVV, and Expiration via the IVR, then pass
this information via an HTTPS request to the merchant gateway and get an
au
>>
I don't think it is that simple. The reason is that on web environments,
the part where the user enters his credit card information in handled on the
providers servers. It would take a provider who specifically allows the
transaction outside of his servers, i.e. on an asterisk IVR. The questi
Title: Re: [asterisk-biz] Credit processing ...
We use authorize.net for this
Ken Rice wrote:
Any provider with authorize.net or payflow
... They have simple APIs (http posts usually) that allow you to
collect the info and pass it to them... Ask you current merchant
service if they can u
Any provider with authorize.net or payflow ... They have simple APIs (http
posts usually) that allow you to collect the info and pass it to them... Ask
you current merchant service if they can use this gateway service
From: "C. Savinovich"
Reply-To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Dis
Well, I, personally, have not found one provider that allows me to do that.
can you recommend me one?
CS
From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Moshe Maeir
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 2:39 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriente
27 matches
Mail list logo
